<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMO release with Theme Browser, Advanced Search and revised Developer Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2008/06/14/amo-release-with-theme-browser-advanced-search-and-revised-developer-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2008/06/14/amo-release-with-theme-browser-advanced-search-and-revised-developer-tools/</link>
	<description>Official Blog of Mozilla Add-ons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:59:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mozilla search add on</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2008/06/14/amo-release-with-theme-browser-advanced-search-and-revised-developer-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>mozilla search add on</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 10:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=23#comment-182</guid>
		<description>[...] matters ... 6 Responses to ???AMO release with Theme Browser, Advanced search and revised ...http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/2008/06/14/amo-release-with-theme-browser-advanced-search-and-revised-...Firefox Turns 3 - Washington PostIt wasn&amp;39t until I&amp;39d finished today&amp;39s review of mozilla [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] matters &#8230; 6 Responses to ???AMO release with Theme Browser, Advanced search and revised &#8230;http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/2008/06/14/amo-release-with-theme-browser-advanced-search-and-revised-&#8230;Firefox Turns 3 &#8211; Washington PostIt wasn&#38;39t until I&#38;39d finished today&#38;39s review of mozilla [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Banker</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2008/06/14/amo-release-with-theme-browser-advanced-search-and-revised-developer-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Banker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=23#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Any chance you&#039;ll be adding a category for dark themes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance you&#8217;ll be adding a category for dark themes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Zamir</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2008/06/14/amo-release-with-theme-browser-advanced-search-and-revised-developer-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Zamir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=23#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Great to see this kind of specificity in searching.

I&#039;d really like to be able to filter (or search) by the following other fields that extensions have:

* those which are or are not site-specific add-ons (this is the most important to me, as I basically never want to use a site-specific one)
* those which (do not) require external software
* those for which source files can be viewed online
* those which are pre-releases or not
* those which contain binary components

Brett</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see this kind of specificity in searching.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d really like to be able to filter (or search) by the following other fields that extensions have:</p>
<p>* those which are or are not site-specific add-ons (this is the most important to me, as I basically never want to use a site-specific one)<br />
* those which (do not) require external software<br />
* those for which source files can be viewed online<br />
* those which are pre-releases or not<br />
* those which contain binary components</p>
<p>Brett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 3 vuole governare il Web &#171; Sometime Happens&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2008/06/14/amo-release-with-theme-browser-advanced-search-and-revised-developer-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 3 vuole governare il Web &#171; Sometime Happens&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=23#comment-179</guid>
		<description>[...] occasione del lancio di Firefox 3, Mozilla ha provveduto ad aggiornare il proprio sito dedicato agli add-on, addons.mozilla.org, che ora sfoggia una grafica più [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] occasione del lancio di Firefox 3, Mozilla ha provveduto ad aggiornare il proprio sito dedicato agli add-on, addons.mozilla.org, che ora sfoggia una grafica più [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2008/06/14/amo-release-with-theme-browser-advanced-search-and-revised-developer-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=23#comment-178</guid>
		<description>About that search capability. The search engine of the addons site is just terrible lately. It frequently, if not normally, fails to find the requested addon or buries it at the end of several pages of irrelevant items. It did not used to be this way. What changed and why?

Searching via Google, an accurate &quot;hit&quot; is immediate.

The search capability very badly needs improvement and soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About that search capability. The search engine of the addons site is just terrible lately. It frequently, if not normally, fails to find the requested addon or buries it at the end of several pages of irrelevant items. It did not used to be this way. What changed and why?</p>
<p>Searching via Google, an accurate &#8220;hit&#8221; is immediate.</p>
<p>The search capability very badly needs improvement and soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bhashem</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2008/06/14/amo-release-with-theme-browser-advanced-search-and-revised-developer-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>bhashem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=23#comment-177</guid>
		<description>@wladimir: We have some ideas on changing the default order and creating a new popularity sort that we&#039;d like to explore. Will be asking for community input shortly.

@h: It&#039;s coming soon. Patience. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@wladimir: We have some ideas on changing the default order and creating a new popularity sort that we&#8217;d like to explore. Will be asking for community input shortly.</p>
<p>@h: It&#8217;s coming soon. Patience. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox Add-ons Updates with Theme Browser &#124; Firefox Facts</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2008/06/14/amo-release-with-theme-browser-advanced-search-and-revised-developer-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox Add-ons Updates with Theme Browser &#124; Firefox Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=23#comment-176</guid>
		<description>[...] the &#8220;behind the scenes&#8221; work done with this round of updates, be sure to check out Basil&#8217;s Bodacious Blog, then remind him I never did get that interview with him&#8230;&#160; :D For more help, check these [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the &#8220;behind the scenes&#8221; work done with this round of updates, be sure to check out Basil&#8217;s Bodacious Blog, then remind him I never did get that interview with him&#8230;&nbsp; <img src='http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  For more help, check these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2008/06/14/amo-release-with-theme-browser-advanced-search-and-revised-developer-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=23#comment-175</guid>
		<description>How come there is still no way to upload search plugins?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come there is still no way to upload search plugins?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wladimir Palant</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2008/06/14/amo-release-with-theme-browser-advanced-search-and-revised-developer-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Wladimir Palant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=23#comment-174</guid>
		<description>I have mixed feelings about that update. Some changes are great (theme browser, developer tools changes), others are definitely a step backwards. Default sort order for themes is theme name - I thought we noticed long ago that sorting by name (at least by default) wasn&#039;t a good idea? User reviews aren&#039;t pre-moderated any more - I guess I have to expect lots of trash reviews, and it will be my responsibility again to track them down (not to mention that, as an add-on author, you can manipulate the average rating by flagging only the trash reviews that have a bad rating). Yes, I understand that pre-moderation is dragging on AMO&#039;s resources but... Search - filed &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439227&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bug 439227&lt;/a&gt; for an issue that was solved long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have mixed feelings about that update. Some changes are great (theme browser, developer tools changes), others are definitely a step backwards. Default sort order for themes is theme name &#8211; I thought we noticed long ago that sorting by name (at least by default) wasn&#8217;t a good idea? User reviews aren&#8217;t pre-moderated any more &#8211; I guess I have to expect lots of trash reviews, and it will be my responsibility again to track them down (not to mention that, as an add-on author, you can manipulate the average rating by flagging only the trash reviews that have a bad rating). Yes, I understand that pre-moderation is dragging on AMO&#8217;s resources but&#8230; Search &#8211; filed <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439227" rel="nofollow">bug 439227</a> for an issue that was solved long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
