<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Quick &amp; Dirty Way to Test Your Add-ons in Fx 3.1b2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2009/01/13/the-quick-dirty-way-to-test-your-add-ons-in-fx-31b2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2009/01/13/the-quick-dirty-way-to-test-your-add-ons-in-fx-31b2/</link>
	<description>Official Blog of Mozilla Add-ons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:59:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Silvestri</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2009/01/13/the-quick-dirty-way-to-test-your-add-ons-in-fx-31b2/comment-page-1/#comment-1920</link>
		<dc:creator>John Silvestri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/?p=244#comment-1920</guid>
		<description>I second Henrik&#039;s recommendation for an important reason: It&#039;s really bad advice to tell people to turn off compatibility checking if it&#039;s supposed to mean anything.  Nightly Tester Tools lets you pass individual extensions with 2 clicks, while keeping Firefox in its normal state otherwise.

(I could be wrong, but I thought Mozilla&#039;s gotten kind of bent out of shape in the past when sites (e.g. /., Lifehacker, et al.) recommend turning off compatibility checking.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second Henrik&#8217;s recommendation for an important reason: It&#8217;s really bad advice to tell people to turn off compatibility checking if it&#8217;s supposed to mean anything.  Nightly Tester Tools lets you pass individual extensions with 2 clicks, while keeping Firefox in its normal state otherwise.</p>
<p>(I could be wrong, but I thought Mozilla&#8217;s gotten kind of bent out of shape in the past when sites (e.g. /., Lifehacker, et al.) recommend turning off compatibility checking.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred Kayser</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2009/01/13/the-quick-dirty-way-to-test-your-add-ons-in-fx-31b2/comment-page-1/#comment-1806</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred Kayser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/?p=244#comment-1806</guid>
		<description>Or just open the package with a zip tool, edit the install.rdf file, change version, close the package, and install. Also just 5 steps...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or just open the package with a zip tool, edit the install.rdf file, change version, close the package, and install. Also just 5 steps&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2009/01/13/the-quick-dirty-way-to-test-your-add-ons-in-fx-31b2/comment-page-1/#comment-1792</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/?p=244#comment-1792</guid>
		<description>You should also mention the add-on &quot;Nightly Tester Tools&quot; which makes the whole process a lot easier and gives some nice additions for nightly testers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should also mention the add-on &#8220;Nightly Tester Tools&#8221; which makes the whole process a lot easier and gives some nice additions for nightly testers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
