Comments on: Firefox Extensions: Global Namespace Pollution http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2009/01/16/firefox-extensions-global-namespace-pollution/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:23:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Jorge Villalobos http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2009/01/16/firefox-extensions-global-namespace-pollution/comment-page-1/#comment-154996 Jorge Villalobos Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:13:54 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/?p=258#comment-154996 We also have <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en/XUL_School/JavaScript_Object_Management" rel="nofollow">this article</a> now. It explains a simpler way to do the same thing, and it's the one AMO reviewers recommend. We also have this article now. It explains a simpler way to do the same thing, and it’s the one AMO reviewers recommend.

]]> By: Alex Vincent http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2009/01/16/firefox-extensions-global-namespace-pollution/comment-page-1/#comment-1825 Alex Vincent Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:54:54 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/?p=258#comment-1825 I thought about this problem a few years ago, and came at it in a different way: http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/weirdal/archives/008101.html It still works, though I now realize I didn't provide sample code. If you're interested, we can talk about it - the code would probably benefit from standardization as a JavaScript Module file. I thought about this problem a few years ago, and came at it in a different way:

http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/weirdal/archives/008101.html

It still works, though I now realize I didn’t provide sample code. If you’re interested, we can talk about it – the code would probably benefit from standardization as a JavaScript Module file.

]]>