<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reviews no longer needed for public nomination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2009/07/13/reviews-no-longer-needed-for-public-nomination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2009/07/13/reviews-no-longer-needed-for-public-nomination/</link>
	<description>Official Blog of Mozilla Add-ons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:10:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DietrichKaiser</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2009/07/13/reviews-no-longer-needed-for-public-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-6767</link>
		<dc:creator>DietrichKaiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/?p=734#comment-6767</guid>
		<description>Counterproductive. The hampering factors remain. Either actually improve the process or leave it where it is - no one expects any better anymore. One step forward, two backward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Counterproductive. The hampering factors remain. Either actually improve the process or leave it where it is &#8211; no one expects any better anymore. One step forward, two backward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KBH</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2009/07/13/reviews-no-longer-needed-for-public-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-6699</link>
		<dc:creator>KBH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/?p=734#comment-6699</guid>
		<description>Good idea, but without other changes it will just increase the queue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea, but without other changes it will just increase the queue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Means</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2009/07/13/reviews-no-longer-needed-for-public-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-6588</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Means</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/?p=734#comment-6588</guid>
		<description>Is there any way to tell where an Addon is in the queue for reviewers?

Does an Addon&#039;s position in the queue change if a new version is uploaded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any way to tell where an Addon is in the queue for reviewers?</p>
<p>Does an Addon&#8217;s position in the queue change if a new version is uploaded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrs</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2009/07/13/reviews-no-longer-needed-for-public-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-5626</link>
		<dc:creator>jrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/?p=734#comment-5626</guid>
		<description>Is there any way to report addons that have slipped through the net and don&#039;t comply with the reviewers guide? In this case I noticed that there&#039;s 3 identically named &quot;Bing&quot; search engine addons (from the review guide it looks like the Microsoft offical one should be the only one there).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any way to report addons that have slipped through the net and don&#8217;t comply with the reviewers guide? In this case I noticed that there&#8217;s 3 identically named &#8220;Bing&#8221; search engine addons (from the review guide it looks like the Microsoft offical one should be the only one there).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
