<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Featured Add-ons Rotation for July 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/2008/07/01/featured-add-ons-rotation-for-july-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/2008/07/01/featured-add-ons-rotation-for-july-2008/</link>
	<description>Add-ons, metrics, distribution and other Mozilla matters</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/2008/07/01/featured-add-ons-rotation-for-july-2008/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=35#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>Thanks Basil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Basil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bhashem</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/2008/07/01/featured-add-ons-rotation-for-july-2008/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>bhashem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=35#comment-993</guid>
		<description>@S: I've previously blogged about how the retention rate is calculated @ http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/2008/05/30/rotation-of-featured-add-ons-on-amo/. It's only a proxy calculation, an approximation, I use active users divided by downloads for a selected period of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@S: I&#8217;ve previously blogged about how the retention rate is calculated @ <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/2008/05/30/rotation-of-featured-add-ons-on-amo/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/2008/05/30/rotation-of-featured-add-ons-on-amo/</a>. It&#8217;s only a proxy calculation, an approximation, I use active users divided by downloads for a selected period of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/2008/07/01/featured-add-ons-rotation-for-july-2008/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=35#comment-990</guid>
		<description>Basil, how do you calculate the retention rate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basil, how do you calculate the retention rate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bhashem</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/2008/07/01/featured-add-ons-rotation-for-july-2008/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>bhashem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 02:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=35#comment-932</guid>
		<description>@Jay: Sorry for the delayed response on this, I must have missed it. The range this time around was 4.5% to 34.9%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jay: Sorry for the delayed response on this, I must have missed it. The range this time around was 4.5% to 34.9%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/2008/07/01/featured-add-ons-rotation-for-july-2008/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=35#comment-910</guid>
		<description>basil, in a previous post you posted that the retention ratio ranged from 9.5% to 48.0%.  if you can share, what was the average in this go around?  thanks in advance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>basil, in a previous post you posted that the retention ratio ranged from 9.5% to 48.0%.  if you can share, what was the average in this go around?  thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bhashem</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/2008/07/01/featured-add-ons-rotation-for-july-2008/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>bhashem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=35#comment-903</guid>
		<description>@Alfred, that bug that you point to has to do with the default ordering and display of the recommended list - not the accuracy of the stats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alfred, that bug that you point to has to do with the default ordering and display of the recommended list - not the accuracy of the stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred Kayser</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/2008/07/01/featured-add-ons-rotation-for-july-2008/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred Kayser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/?p=35#comment-901</guid>
		<description>Note that statistics on usage of themes (and other extensions) is still not right on AMO, so if these are used for this rotation, the rotation is then also flawed...
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291413</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that statistics on usage of themes (and other extensions) is still not right on AMO, so if these are used for this rotation, the rotation is then also flawed&#8230;<br />
See <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291413" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291413</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
