<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Try server purdyness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/bhearsum/archives/7/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/bhearsum/archives/7</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:42:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Wilsher</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/bhearsum/archives/7/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Wilsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/bhearsum/archives/7#comment-3</guid>
		<description>My only question is why is the max size in KB?  Clearly MB would be a more useful unit considering how big the maximum patch size is.

For that matter - why is there a max patch size?  This is behind ldap, so it&#039;s not like the whole world has access (which is why I believe bugzilla has a maximum patch size).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only question is why is the max size in KB?  Clearly MB would be a more useful unit considering how big the maximum patch size is.</p>
<p>For that matter &#8211; why is there a max patch size?  This is behind ldap, so it&#8217;s not like the whole world has access (which is why I believe bugzilla has a maximum patch size).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

