<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Chris Pitchin&#039; Hey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones</link>
	<description>Mozilla hacks and suchlike</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:52:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi-process Firefox, coming to an Internets near you by hank</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2009/06/21/multi-process-firefox-coming-to-an-internets-near-you/comment-page-2/#comment-1506</link>
		<dc:creator>hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/?p=20#comment-1506</guid>
		<description>i think that a separate hidden window/process for tracemonkey to do the javascript in would be good like chrome has that might ad more speed also overall this looks like a great idea i thank and praise you for your work on this so far</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that a separate hidden window/process for tracemonkey to do the javascript in would be good like chrome has that might ad more speed also overall this looks like a great idea i thank and praise you for your work on this so far</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi-process Firefox, coming to an Internets near you by On Competition - Kurifuri</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2009/06/21/multi-process-firefox-coming-to-an-internets-near-you/comment-page-2/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>On Competition - Kurifuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/?p=20#comment-390</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#8217;s coming to Firefox. (Yeah, this is old news by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#8217;s coming to Firefox. (Yeah, this is old news by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi-process Firefox, coming to an Internets near you by &#187; Mozilla lavora al Firefox multiprocesso Cala news: Le news più aggiornate del web</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2009/06/21/multi-process-firefox-coming-to-an-internets-near-you/comment-page-2/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Mozilla lavora al Firefox multiprocesso Cala news: Le news più aggiornate del web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/?p=20#comment-385</guid>
		<description>[...] Un primo esempio di questo approccio è stato illustrato in questo screencast (in formato OGG Theora), dove viene mostrato un prototipo di browser che esegue il rendering delle pagine web in processi separati e isolati da quello principale. Maggiori informazioni su questa dimostrazione vengono fornite in questo post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Un primo esempio di questo approccio è stato illustrato in questo screencast (in formato OGG Theora), dove viene mostrato un prototipo di browser che esegue il rendering delle pagine web in processi separati e isolati da quello principale. Maggiori informazioni su questa dimostrazione vengono fornite in questo post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi-process Firefox, coming to an Internets near you by cjones</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2009/06/21/multi-process-firefox-coming-to-an-internets-near-you/comment-page-2/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>cjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/?p=20#comment-380</guid>
		<description>@Adam: this has been in various stages of planning for at least 8 years.

@asdf: you might want to read &#124;man nice&#124; again.

@Ben: we at Mozilla haven&#039;t been looking at security in earnest yet, but I know that the Google Chromium team at least considered using seccomp.  I don&#039;t know what they eventually chose, though.

@anon: scheduling and prioritization of Firefox processes is pretty far down the road right now ;).  But your suggestion is definitely something I&#039;d like to implement eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adam: this has been in various stages of planning for at least 8 years.</p>
<p>@asdf: you might want to read |man nice| again.</p>
<p>@Ben: we at Mozilla haven&#8217;t been looking at security in earnest yet, but I know that the Google Chromium team at least considered using seccomp.  I don&#8217;t know what they eventually chose, though.</p>
<p>@anon: scheduling and prioritization of Firefox processes is pretty far down the road right now <img src='http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  But your suggestion is definitely something I&#8217;d like to implement eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi-process Firefox, coming to an Internets near you by Firefox将加入多进程浏览 &#171; 每日IT新闻，最新IT资讯，聚合多站点消息，保证你与世界同步</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2009/06/21/multi-process-firefox-coming-to-an-internets-near-you/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox将加入多进程浏览 &#171; 每日IT新闻，最新IT资讯，聚合多站点消息，保证你与世界同步</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/?p=20#comment-368</guid>
		<description>[...] Arstechnica.com报道，Mozilla即将在Firefox中加入多进程浏览功能，这项功能已存在于Google Chrome浏览器中，它将能帮助改进Firefox浏览器的稳定性和安全性。 该项目名叫Electrolysis，开发者已推出一个原型，每一个网页都由一个单独的进程渲染。Firefox开发者过去早就探讨过多进程浏览，但并未引起重视，直到Google和微软各自发布了支持多进程浏览的浏览器。在Firefox加入多进程浏览并不是一个简单的任务，许多底层的组件都必须进行修改。上个月开发者演示了一个原型，显示单个网页崩溃并不会影响整个浏览器。开发者希望能尽快在nightly版中加入该功能，让更多人进行测试。不过目前Mac OS X版的开发还未展开。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Arstechnica.com报道，Mozilla即将在Firefox中加入多进程浏览功能，这项功能已存在于Google Chrome浏览器中，它将能帮助改进Firefox浏览器的稳定性和安全性。 该项目名叫Electrolysis，开发者已推出一个原型，每一个网页都由一个单独的进程渲染。Firefox开发者过去早就探讨过多进程浏览，但并未引起重视，直到Google和微软各自发布了支持多进程浏览的浏览器。在Firefox加入多进程浏览并不是一个简单的任务，许多底层的组件都必须进行修改。上个月开发者演示了一个原型，显示单个网页崩溃并不会影响整个浏览器。开发者希望能尽快在nightly版中加入该功能，让更多人进行测试。不过目前Mac OS X版的开发还未展开。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi-process Firefox, coming to an Internets near you by anon</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2009/06/21/multi-process-firefox-coming-to-an-internets-near-you/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/?p=20#comment-357</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad this feature is finally on its way, thanks for the work on it to everyone involved.

The way I read forums on line is generally to go to &quot;view new posts&quot; page, then just ctrl-click on all the threads I want to look at. This is a killer for FF, and generally the browser stops and starts responding for a period of several minutes, depending on things like posts/thread, graphics, number of new tabs....

A process per tab would be excellent for me... and might even convince me to upgrade FF from v2, as I am avoiding the new URL bar.

I should think this has been proposed, but how about the foreground tab being at higher priority than the background tabs? That&#039;d help us poor single corers too ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad this feature is finally on its way, thanks for the work on it to everyone involved.</p>
<p>The way I read forums on line is generally to go to &#8220;view new posts&#8221; page, then just ctrl-click on all the threads I want to look at. This is a killer for FF, and generally the browser stops and starts responding for a period of several minutes, depending on things like posts/thread, graphics, number of new tabs&#8230;.</p>
<p>A process per tab would be excellent for me&#8230; and might even convince me to upgrade FF from v2, as I am avoiding the new URL bar.</p>
<p>I should think this has been proposed, but how about the foreground tab being at higher priority than the background tabs? That&#8217;d help us poor single corers too <img src='http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi-process Firefox, coming to an Internets near you by Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2009/06/21/multi-process-firefox-coming-to-an-internets-near-you/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/?p=20#comment-354</guid>
		<description>Has anyone looked at using seccomp on Linux or other process isolation or privilege dropping techniques on the rendering process?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone looked at using seccomp on Linux or other process isolation or privilege dropping techniques on the rendering process?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi-process Firefox, coming to an Internets near you by asdf</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2009/06/21/multi-process-firefox-coming-to-an-internets-near-you/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>asdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/?p=20#comment-353</guid>
		<description>Woah! You mean I&#039;ll finally be able to give and run pesky bookmarks a nice -20 priority so their rendering doesn&#039;t suck all my cycles?
Hells yeah, I&#039;ll take that feature.
Thanks for multiproc firefox!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah! You mean I&#8217;ll finally be able to give and run pesky bookmarks a nice -20 priority so their rendering doesn&#8217;t suck all my cycles?<br />
Hells yeah, I&#8217;ll take that feature.<br />
Thanks for multiproc firefox!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi-process Firefox, coming to an Internets near you by Adnan Siddiqi</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2009/06/21/multi-process-firefox-coming-to-an-internets-near-you/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Adnan Siddiqi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/?p=20#comment-352</guid>
		<description>What you guys have been planning after today&#039;s Hot news,the Chrome OS.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you guys have been planning after today&#8217;s Hot news,the Chrome OS.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi-process Firefox, coming to an Internets near you by Firefox stability to get a boost with multiprocess browsing-NotFailed</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2009/06/21/multi-process-firefox-coming-to-an-internets-near-you/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox stability to get a boost with multiprocess browsing-NotFailed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/?p=20#comment-336</guid>
		<description>[...] itself keeps running as if nothing happened. This is a big step forward,&#8221; he wrote in a blog entry about the demo. &#8220;With Firefox protected from buggy pages and plugins, more fun is possible. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] itself keeps running as if nothing happened. This is a big step forward,&#8221; he wrote in a blog entry about the demo. &#8220;With Firefox protected from buggy pages and plugins, more fun is possible. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
