Comments on: Animated PNG http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2007/04/03/animated-png/ The odd parity bit Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:26:38 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Justin Dolske http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2007/04/03/animated-png/comment-page-1/#comment-11836 Justin Dolske Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:40:15 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2007/04/03/animated-png/#comment-11836 Sam: MNG has been argued to death in the bug, so I'll leave it at that. APNG's goal was allow the PNG format to be a viable replacement for animated GIFs. It's a small, simple modification to libpng -- which makes it more likely to be implemented/adopted by others. Sam: MNG has been argued to death in the bug, so I’ll leave it at that. APNG’s goal was allow the PNG format to be a viable replacement for animated GIFs. It’s a small, simple modification to libpng — which makes it more likely to be implemented/adopted by others.

]]> By: Serious Sam http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2007/04/03/animated-png/comment-page-1/#comment-11426 Serious Sam Fri, 06 Apr 2007 17:49:42 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2007/04/03/animated-png/#comment-11426 That is like a few years late: http://gjuyn.xs4all.nl/libmng/download.html?cat=3 Removing a fully functional standard and replacing it with a non-standard bastard child: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18574 A practice usually associated with Microsoft, good job! That is like a few years late: http://gjuyn.xs4all.nl/libmng/download.html?cat=3
Removing a fully functional standard and replacing it with a non-standard bastard child: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18574
A practice usually associated with Microsoft, good job!

]]> By: Goo http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2007/04/03/animated-png/comment-page-1/#comment-11169 Goo Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:17:05 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2007/04/03/animated-png/#comment-11169 It works with alpha3 ... it's beautifull... I can't remember seeing a .gif this clear, with such a good colour etc .. Firefox rules, do you have a date to finalize the apng spec ???? Se we can make the web better ? :) It works with alpha3 … it’s beautifull… I can’t remember seeing a .gif this clear, with such a good colour etc ..

Firefox rules, do you have a date to finalize the apng spec ???? Se we can make the web better ? :)

]]> By: Goolic http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2007/04/03/animated-png/comment-page-1/#comment-11166 Goolic Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:00:13 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2007/04/03/animated-png/#comment-11166 I have a nightly a little more recent than a2 and it doesn't work ... it's too old ??? I have a nightly a little more recent than a2 and it doesn’t work … it’s too old ???

]]> By: Hanspeter http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2007/04/03/animated-png/comment-page-1/#comment-11135 Hanspeter Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:32:10 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2007/04/03/animated-png/#comment-11135 hmm... pngcrush doesn't like the extra frames and rips them out :( hmm… pngcrush doesn’t like the extra frames and rips them out :(

]]> By: andrew http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2007/04/03/animated-png/comment-page-1/#comment-11117 andrew Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:47:35 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2007/04/03/animated-png/#comment-11117 cool! cool!

]]> By: Peter Lairo http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2007/04/03/animated-png/comment-page-1/#comment-11103 Peter Lairo Wed, 04 Apr 2007 07:50:24 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2007/04/03/animated-png/#comment-11103 Very nice! (although the spin-rate makes me dizzy). Why is that file 600 kibi? That seems pretty large. Very nice! (although the spin-rate makes me dizzy).

Why is that file 600 kibi? That seems pretty large.

]]>