<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Glory To The Hypno-Throbber</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/</link>
	<description>The odd parity bit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:15:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eyedunno</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/comment-page-1/#comment-43497</link>
		<dc:creator>Eyedunno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 03:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/#comment-43497</guid>
		<description>I went ahead and made an APNG version of the Windows/Linux throbber:
At rest:
http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/3535/throbbersmallut1.png
Animated:
http://img377.imageshack.us/img377/6395/throbberanimvt1.png

I just altered the opacity of the original gif (I actually did this years ago in preparation for APNG, which took a long time to actually show up), then resized it to 128X128 and back to 16X16 with bicubic resampling in the hopes of getting rid of some of the pixelation.

My own browser has 1px white and grey horizontal lines, and this new throbber matches perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went ahead and made an APNG version of the Windows/Linux throbber:<br />
At rest:<br />
<a href="http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/3535/throbbersmallut1.png" rel="nofollow">http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/3535/throbbersmallut1.png</a><br />
Animated:<br />
<a href="http://img377.imageshack.us/img377/6395/throbberanimvt1.png" rel="nofollow">http://img377.imageshack.us/img377/6395/throbberanimvt1.png</a></p>
<p>I just altered the opacity of the original gif (I actually did this years ago in preparation for APNG, which took a long time to actually show up), then resized it to 128X128 and back to 16X16 with bicubic resampling in the hopes of getting rid of some of the pixelation.</p>
<p>My own browser has 1px white and grey horizontal lines, and this new throbber matches perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hasdruabl</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/comment-page-1/#comment-38028</link>
		<dc:creator>hasdruabl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 10:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/#comment-38028</guid>
		<description>Hey ...

How did you make the vista throbber? Could you send me or post the JavaScript for APNGedit?

thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8230;</p>
<p>How did you make the vista throbber? Could you send me or post the JavaScript for APNGedit?</p>
<p>thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deed</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/comment-page-1/#comment-27903</link>
		<dc:creator>Deed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/#comment-27903</guid>
		<description>Hm...  How about something different for the design than a circle? If merging the throbber with buttons would turn out to cause interface confusion, and people like saving space, then how about a small, thin vertical progress bar of sorts? I.e. like the Vista/XP progress bar when it doesn&#039;t know how much time is left and it&#039;s just a small portion moving across constantly?

So basically, thin and vertical line that&#039;s high-contrast and has a dot/gradient or whatever moving maybe up and down on it? Also it would be right between the buttons and URL bar by default, so the user wouldn&#039;t have to look too far for it while still having obvious enough buttons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm&#8230;  How about something different for the design than a circle? If merging the throbber with buttons would turn out to cause interface confusion, and people like saving space, then how about a small, thin vertical progress bar of sorts? I.e. like the Vista/XP progress bar when it doesn&#8217;t know how much time is left and it&#8217;s just a small portion moving across constantly?</p>
<p>So basically, thin and vertical line that&#8217;s high-contrast and has a dot/gradient or whatever moving maybe up and down on it? Also it would be right between the buttons and URL bar by default, so the user wouldn&#8217;t have to look too far for it while still having obvious enough buttons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/comment-page-1/#comment-25586</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/#comment-25586</guid>
		<description>Just out of interest: in your view, what makes Reload and the throbber particularly orthogonal?

*shrug* Well, I&#039;m not insistent on it; I simply think it would be a good move, and hastened to suggest it as such. ^_^ Appreciate your considering the idea, anyhow! Maybe mull it over a little more before you drop it altogether?

Stop doesn&#039;t make as much sense to me, personally, but even that would save space and give some of the same benefit.

Even if we stick with the status quo, though, I like the direction you&#039;re gong with the throbber. Have fun playing around with prototypes. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just out of interest: in your view, what makes Reload and the throbber particularly orthogonal?</p>
<p>*shrug* Well, I&#8217;m not insistent on it; I simply think it would be a good move, and hastened to suggest it as such. ^_^ Appreciate your considering the idea, anyhow! Maybe mull it over a little more before you drop it altogether?</p>
<p>Stop doesn&#8217;t make as much sense to me, personally, but even that would save space and give some of the same benefit.</p>
<p>Even if we stick with the status quo, though, I like the direction you&#8217;re gong with the throbber. Have fun playing around with prototypes. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Dolske</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/comment-page-1/#comment-25561</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dolske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/#comment-25561</guid>
		<description>Eh, combining reload and throbber doesn&#039;t make sense to me. The throbber is an indicator, buttons are for performing user actions... I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s wise to combine the two. Reload, in particular, is rather orthogonal to what the throbber represents. Combining the throbber with the stop button would seem a better match... &quot;Look, I&#039;m busy, click me to stop.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, combining reload and throbber doesn&#8217;t make sense to me. The throbber is an indicator, buttons are for performing user actions&#8230; I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s wise to combine the two. Reload, in particular, is rather orthogonal to what the throbber represents. Combining the throbber with the stop button would seem a better match&#8230; &#8220;Look, I&#8217;m busy, click me to stop.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/comment-page-1/#comment-25548</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 06:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/#comment-25548</guid>
		<description>I elaborated further on that idea in the forums, but in case you don&#039;t read there, I thought I&#039;d repost here. Hope you don&#039;t mind! :)

[quote=&quot;Cusser&quot;]...how is this a good idea? What problem does this solve? Isn&#039;t any gain offset by the fact that no other GUI I can think of has buttons that indicate status?[/quote]

Clicking the Reload button causes the page to load; the throbber shows that the page is loading. The two are fundamentally, functionally related. From that standpoint alone, it makes perfect sense to combine them.

But there are other reasons as well. For one, it would eliminate the need for a separate throbber on the navbar, thus saving space.

For another, it would provide instant, obvious feedback when you click Reload, which is always helpful, especially for amateur users like, say, our parents. On OS X, I think the toolbar throbber isn&#039;t even shown by default. Unless you have multiple tabs open -- and believe me, many users like the aforementioned parents don&#039;t have a clue about tabs -- the only feedback when a page is loading is the small progress bar at the complete opposite corner of the browser window. Considering it logically and intuitively, who would think to look so far from where you&#039;ve just clicked to see whether it had any effect? My mother in law is always asking whether the browser&#039;s doing anything after she&#039;s told it to (re)load a page. If the Reload button, right by the location bar, would indicate that something is indeed happening, she&#039;d never have to ask that again.

In other words, we want Firefox to be friendly, intuitive, and logical, so that it will be immediately apparent to even the most novice of users what&#039;s going on. And we want to reduce clutter, thereby increasing usability further. Don&#039;t we? 

As for &quot;no other GUI&quot; indicating status in such a way, that&#039;s not actually true. Although it&#039;s not the same kind of program, World of Warcraft, for instance, shows a refresh gauge on a skill button after you click it, so you can immediately see pertinent feedback. Closer to home, in the browser space, Safari indicates status by changing the Reload button to Stop when loading, and changing it back to Reload when finished. Now, Firefox developers have made a good case (I think) for why those two buttons are better left separate, but my point is that this sort of feedback does have precedent. Besides, that particular conflict is caused by trying to merge the GUI for two opposing functions. The throbber is a very different matter. Adding it to the Reload button wouldn&#039;t blur functionality or cause anybody to accidentally reload a page when they intend it to *stop* loading. Instead it would elegantly merge two elements which represent related aspects of the same function.

This could be the sort of nice little touch that would give the average user a &quot;Hey, cool!&quot; moment and warm fuzzies about their browser. I&#039;d say that&#039;s a big win on the GUI front. And not only a big win for users, but also a minor coup of sorts for Mozilla. Interfaces are headed in this more streamlined, more interactive direction anyhow. It&#039;s a small thing, but being the first to bat with this idea would put Firefox ahead of competing browsers in usability and innovation both. So yeah, all told, I think I have pretty good reason to be stoked about the idea. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I elaborated further on that idea in the forums, but in case you don&#8217;t read there, I thought I&#8217;d repost here. Hope you don&#8217;t mind! :)</p>
<p>[quote="Cusser"]&#8230;how is this a good idea? What problem does this solve? Isn&#8217;t any gain offset by the fact that no other GUI I can think of has buttons that indicate status?[/quote]</p>
<p>Clicking the Reload button causes the page to load; the throbber shows that the page is loading. The two are fundamentally, functionally related. From that standpoint alone, it makes perfect sense to combine them.</p>
<p>But there are other reasons as well. For one, it would eliminate the need for a separate throbber on the navbar, thus saving space.</p>
<p>For another, it would provide instant, obvious feedback when you click Reload, which is always helpful, especially for amateur users like, say, our parents. On OS X, I think the toolbar throbber isn&#8217;t even shown by default. Unless you have multiple tabs open &#8212; and believe me, many users like the aforementioned parents don&#8217;t have a clue about tabs &#8212; the only feedback when a page is loading is the small progress bar at the complete opposite corner of the browser window. Considering it logically and intuitively, who would think to look so far from where you&#8217;ve just clicked to see whether it had any effect? My mother in law is always asking whether the browser&#8217;s doing anything after she&#8217;s told it to (re)load a page. If the Reload button, right by the location bar, would indicate that something is indeed happening, she&#8217;d never have to ask that again.</p>
<p>In other words, we want Firefox to be friendly, intuitive, and logical, so that it will be immediately apparent to even the most novice of users what&#8217;s going on. And we want to reduce clutter, thereby increasing usability further. Don&#8217;t we? </p>
<p>As for &#8220;no other GUI&#8221; indicating status in such a way, that&#8217;s not actually true. Although it&#8217;s not the same kind of program, World of Warcraft, for instance, shows a refresh gauge on a skill button after you click it, so you can immediately see pertinent feedback. Closer to home, in the browser space, Safari indicates status by changing the Reload button to Stop when loading, and changing it back to Reload when finished. Now, Firefox developers have made a good case (I think) for why those two buttons are better left separate, but my point is that this sort of feedback does have precedent. Besides, that particular conflict is caused by trying to merge the GUI for two opposing functions. The throbber is a very different matter. Adding it to the Reload button wouldn&#8217;t blur functionality or cause anybody to accidentally reload a page when they intend it to *stop* loading. Instead it would elegantly merge two elements which represent related aspects of the same function.</p>
<p>This could be the sort of nice little touch that would give the average user a &#8220;Hey, cool!&#8221; moment and warm fuzzies about their browser. I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s a big win on the GUI front. And not only a big win for users, but also a minor coup of sorts for Mozilla. Interfaces are headed in this more streamlined, more interactive direction anyhow. It&#8217;s a small thing, but being the first to bat with this idea would put Firefox ahead of competing browsers in usability and innovation both. So yeah, all told, I think I have pretty good reason to be stoked about the idea. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/comment-page-1/#comment-25496</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/#comment-25496</guid>
		<description>The APNG&#039;s look good, especially OS X and Draft 2. However, I just read a suggestion on mozillaZine forums that sounds even better to me, the more I think about it:

Why not combine the throbber and the Reload button?

While a page is loading, the Reload arrow can spin. We should probably still have a throbber on each tab, but I think this idea would provide a simple, elegant, space-saving, and distinctive solution for the navbar. And it has the extra benefit of giving instant feedback when you click on Reload.

Credit for the idea goes to omgy. See http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=3258462#3258462</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The APNG&#8217;s look good, especially OS X and Draft 2. However, I just read a suggestion on mozillaZine forums that sounds even better to me, the more I think about it:</p>
<p>Why not combine the throbber and the Reload button?</p>
<p>While a page is loading, the Reload arrow can spin. We should probably still have a throbber on each tab, but I think this idea would provide a simple, elegant, space-saving, and distinctive solution for the navbar. And it has the extra benefit of giving instant feedback when you click on Reload.</p>
<p>Credit for the idea goes to omgy. See <a href="http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=3258462#3258462" rel="nofollow">http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=3258462#3258462</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hyperion2010</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/comment-page-1/#comment-25186</link>
		<dc:creator>Hyperion2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/#comment-25186</guid>
		<description>I will be happy to take the rumored linux throbber so long as it maintains the authentic speed variations with the rate of page loading/browser work.

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be happy to take the rumored linux throbber so long as it maintains the authentic speed variations with the rate of page loading/browser work.</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xenobiologista</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/comment-page-1/#comment-25184</link>
		<dc:creator>Xenobiologista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/#comment-25184</guid>
		<description>The blue and red arcs are cute but FAR too distracting. They remind me of playing two-player Nibbles/Snake as a child and I want to keep watching them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blue and red arcs are cute but FAR too distracting. They remind me of playing two-player Nibbles/Snake as a child and I want to keep watching them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark S</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/comment-page-1/#comment-25062</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2008/02/10/all-glory-to-the-hypno-throbber/#comment-25062</guid>
		<description>I moved to a mac a year ago and do like the mac&#039;s throbber a lot better than the PC&#039;s.  It&#039;s sharp and cool.
So I&#039;m all for using the mac throbber.

One thought with using the layered image was to having an outer rim (perhaps something like the mac&#039;s dots) and an inner rim, but have them going in the same direction at different speeds.  The idea would be kind of like a clock.  The outer track makes two revolutions for every one revolution the inner track makes.
Something along those lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I moved to a mac a year ago and do like the mac&#8217;s throbber a lot better than the PC&#8217;s.  It&#8217;s sharp and cool.<br />
So I&#8217;m all for using the mac throbber.</p>
<p>One thought with using the layered image was to having an outer rim (perhaps something like the mac&#8217;s dots) and an inner rim, but have them going in the same direction at different speeds.  The idea would be kind of like a clock.  The outer track makes two revolutions for every one revolution the inner track makes.<br />
Something along those lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

