<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Justin Dolske's blog &#187; PlanetMozilla</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/category/planetmozilla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske</link>
	<description>The odd parity bit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:29:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sneaky software installs</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/10/13/sneaky-software-installs/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/10/13/sneaky-software-installs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dolske</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlanetFirefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlanetMozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mozilla Plugin Check page was released today, so I loaded it up to see the latest changes. &#8220;Looks good,&#8221; I thought, and skimmed the list of plugins it displayed for me.  Quicktime, Silverlight, Flash, and&#8230; Woah, wait.
Silverlight?
On my OS X box? How the fuck did that get there? I sure don&#8217;t remember installing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mozilla <A href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/plugincheck/">Plugin Check</a> page was released today, so I loaded it up to see the latest changes. &#8220;Looks good,&#8221; I thought, and skimmed the list of plugins it displayed for me.  Quicktime, Silverlight, Flash, and&#8230; Woah, wait.</p>
<p>Silverlight?</p>
<p>On my OS X box? How the fuck did that get there? I sure don&#8217;t remember installing it. Grrrr!</p>
<p>A little web searching later, and I found my answer. It&#8217;s silently installed with Flip4Mac (a set of Quicktime components to allow playing Microsoft proprietary media formats on OS X), which I had installed a week or two ago to try something, and then promptly forgot about. The installer doesn&#8217;t have a word to say about it, unless you click a little &#8220;Customize&#8221; button on the 5th screen on the install:</p>
<p><img src="http://people.mozilla.com/~dolske/blogimg/flipcrap.png"></p>
<p>That really annoys me. Silent, sneaky software installs are evil, evil, evil.</p>
<p>At least Flip4Mac includes an uninstaller, so I ran that. It&#8217;s actually a package, so you&#8217;re confusingly prompted to &#8220;Select the disk where you want to install the uninstaller software.&#8221;, but it was otherwise painless. Now to just restart my browser, check about:plugins, and&#8230;</p>
<p>GAHHHH! It&#8217;s still there. Their uninstaller uninstalls the Flip4Mac bits, but not the Silverlight plug. Solution:</p>
<p><tt>rm -rf /Library/Internet\ Plug-Ins/Silverlight.plugin/</tt></p>
<p>It&#8217;s finally dead, Jim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/10/13/sneaky-software-installs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making progress</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/10/08/making-progress/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/10/08/making-progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dolske</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlanetFirefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlanetMozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re running nightly builds of trunk or Firefox 3.6, you may notice a smoother progress bar while installing the nightly updates&#8230;
The old progress bar behavior had always seemed a bit odd to me &#8212; it would do nothing for a bit, move to about 15% point, and then suddenly finish. I didn&#8217;t get around [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re running nightly builds of trunk or Firefox 3.6, you may notice a smoother progress bar while installing the nightly updates&#8230;</p>
<p>The old progress bar behavior had always seemed a bit odd to me &#8212; it would do nothing for a bit, move to about 15% point, and then suddenly finish. I didn&#8217;t get around to looking at why it did that until I used the updater on a Windows CE netbook. The device is a lot slower than a normal system, so the unusual progress bar movement could appear frozen for over a minute! That&#8217;s really poor UI feedback, so I set about fixing it.</p>
<p>You can read the gory details in <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=517102">bug 517102</a>, but the end result is that the progress bar now tracks progress more accurately, and the updater runs 3 times faster too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/10/08/making-progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the tree REALLY green?</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/10/08/is-the-tree-really-green/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/10/08/is-the-tree-really-green/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dolske</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlanetFirefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlanetMozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While sheriffing yesterday, I was a bit confused when dbaron asked if I was looking into all the orange. The tree (http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/Firefox/) looked mostly green, except for a handful of earlier Talos oranges. So, yadda yadda, it turns out that most of the test boxes report to a separate tinderbox tree now &#8212; http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/Firefox-Unittest/. There [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While sheriffing yesterday, I was a bit confused when dbaron asked if I was looking into all the orange. The tree (<a href="http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/Firefox/">http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/Firefox/</a>) looked mostly green, except for a handful of earlier Talos oranges. So, yadda yadda, it turns out that most of the test boxes report to a separate tinderbox tree now &#8212; <a href="http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/Firefox-Unittest/">http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/Firefox-Unittest/</a>. There are similar splits for the 3.6 and 3.5 trees.</p>
<p>This was probably announced somewhere, but 3 other developers also didn&#8217;t know this was the case. So, I figured a blog post was in order.</p>
<p><a href="http://tests.themasta.com/tinderboxpushlog/">Tinderboxpushlog</a> already includes both sets of data, and I&#8217;ve just updated <a href="http://isthetreegreen.com/">isTheTreeGreen.com</a> to use both sets as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/10/08/is-the-tree-really-green/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experimenting with build times</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/10/04/experimenting-with-build-times/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/10/04/experimenting-with-build-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dolske</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlanetMozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a new Windows desktop last week, and was curious if enabling disk compression would have any effect on build times&#8230; The theory being that source code compresses well (binaries too, to a lesser degree), so less disk IO should result. The price is more CPU usage, but this is a Core i7 box, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a new Windows desktop last week, and was curious if enabling disk compression would have any effect on build times&#8230; The theory being that source code compresses well (binaries too, to a lesser degree), so less disk IO should result. The price is more CPU usage, but this is a Core i7 box, so that&#8217;s basically free.</p>
<p>Result: Theory Busted.</p>
<p>Without disk compression, a full build took 23 minutes. With disk compression, 24 minutes. [Drive formatted between tests.] I&#8217;d guess some combination of not being IO bound plus disk seeks dominate, so compression doesn&#8217;t really help and just adds overhead. I also tried disabling &#8220;write-cache buffer flushing&#8221; to no effect, although I&#8217;m curious if splitting my build across two drives will help at all [src on one, objdir on the other; currently it's in a RAID-0 config].</p>
<p>One thing that would be nice is if parallel make worked correctly with Mozilla on Windows. If I build with anything higher than MOZ_MAKE_FLAGS=&#8221;-j1&#8243;, the build hangs at random (?) places. Seeing as this is a quad-core box (8-core, if you count HT), that makes me all sad and frowny.</p>
<p>Update: Mitch on IRC pointed out bsmedberg&#8217;s pymake work. With -j1 it&#8217;s about 30 seconds slower, but with -j10 it did a full build in 11 minutes (without hanging like a gmake build did!). Yay! I should also note that until now I&#8217;ve been doing Windows builds in a VM, which can take well over an hour to finish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/10/04/experimenting-with-build-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ahoy, mateys!</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/09/17/ahoy-mateys/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/09/17/ahoy-mateys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dolske</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PlanetMozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yarrr! Talk Like A Pirate Day be comin&#8217; up. Ye sprogs that  been usin&#8217; isthetreegreen.com for tinderbox status should join the rest of us gentlemen &#8216;o fortune at me new site, bethetreegreen.com. It even be usin&#8217; a pirate CSS @font-face! Shiver me timbers!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yarrr! <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Talk_Like_a_Pirate_Day">Talk Like A Pirate Day</a> be comin&#8217; up. Ye sprogs that  been usin&#8217; <a href="http://isthetreegreen.com/">isthetreegreen.com</a> for tinderbox status should join the rest of us gentlemen &#8216;o fortune at me new site, <a href="http://bethetreegreen.com/">bethetreegreen.com</a>. It even be usin&#8217; a pirate CSS @font-face! Shiver me timbers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/09/17/ahoy-mateys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Device orientation</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/08/24/device-orientation/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/08/24/device-orientation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dolske</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlanetMozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doug just posted about the device orientation support he recently landed. Sitting here with my MacBook Pro, I just had to play with it &#8212; resulting in this little demo. Orientation + CSS Transforms FTW!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug <a href="http://dougt.org/wordpress/2009/08/orientation/">just posted</a> about the device orientation support he recently landed. Sitting here with my MacBook Pro, I just had to play with it &#8212; resulting in <a href="https://people.mozilla.com/~dolske/tmp/awesome.html">this little demo</a>. Orientation + CSS Transforms FTW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/08/24/device-orientation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simple instructions for building Firefox from source</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/06/04/simple-instructions-for-building-firefox-from-source/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/06/04/simple-instructions-for-building-firefox-from-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dolske</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlanetMozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past, figuring out how to build Firefox from source tended to be really confusing. The documentation explained too much about how the build system worked, how multiple projects were built, presented too many choices, and generally had lots of details not relevant to most people.
A couple weeks ago, someone on IRC pointed out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past, figuring out how to build Firefox from source tended to be really confusing. The documentation explained too much about how the build system worked, how multiple projects were built, presented too many choices, and generally had lots of details not relevant to most people.</p>
<p>A couple weeks ago, someone on IRC pointed out that jorendorff had created a simplified set of instructions: <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Simple_build">https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Simple_build</a> I think this is great!</p>
<p>There are still multiple steps (especially if you&#8217;re on Windows), but it&#8217;s a lot more streamlined than other documentation and is geared towards doing cut&#8217;n'paste. In a nutshell, it&#8217;s a lot less intimidating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/06/04/simple-instructions-for-building-firefox-from-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Form History Expiration Day!</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/05/13/happy-form-history-expiration-day/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/05/13/happy-form-history-expiration-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 04:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dolske</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PlanetMozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last year, I&#8217;ve slowly been poking at Firefox&#8217;s form history implementation (aka &#8220;satchel&#8221;). Triaging the backlog of bugs, fixing some issues, and generally laying the groundwork for other exciting changes to come in Firefox.next. One notable change will start taking effect today or tomorrow (for Firefox 3.5 users) &#8212; the expiration of old, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last year, I&#8217;ve slowly been poking at Firefox&#8217;s form history implementation (aka &#8220;satchel&#8221;). Triaging the backlog of bugs, fixing some issues, and generally laying the groundwork for other exciting changes to come in <a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Namoroka">Firefox.next</a>. One notable change will start taking effect today or tomorrow (for Firefox 3.5 users) &#8212; the expiration of old, unused form history. A little background&#8230;</p>
<p>Back in November I implemented <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463154">bug 463154</a>, which added some additional data to the form history database. It now stores timestamps for when data was first added, when it was last used, and how many times it has been used. The first consumer of this data was the Clear Recent History dialog &#8212; we needed the timestamp to allow clearing the last hour (or whatever) of form history.</p>
<p>The first time you run a build with this change, all existing form history entries are assigned timestamps with the current time. So, if you were using Firefox trunk nightlies back in November 2008, you&#8217;ll have a bunch of entries with a first-used date set to around November 14th (the first nightly with this fix). Beta users got this in Firefox 3.1 Beta 2 (released December 8th), and it was also backported to Firefox 3.0.9 (released April 21st).</p>
<p>The second piece of background is that I recently fixed <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=243136">bug 243136</a>, which adds support for expiring old form history entries. You might be surprised to learn that until this bugfix, we basically only removed form history entries when explicitly requested from the Clear Private Data dialog, or when a specific value was manually removed from the autocomplete dropdown by the user (hilight one and press delete or shift-delete!). Now, once a day or so, form history entries that haven&#8217;t been used for a long time will be deleted. The maximum age is determined by the browser.history_expire_days preference, which defaults to 180 days.</p>
<p>Now, if you&#8217;re clever, you might notice that November 14th 2008 + 180 days = today. If you&#8217;re not clever, well, reread the last sentence. So, Happy Form History Expiration Day! Note that expiration can only happen with Firefox 3.5 Beta 4 (or newer). And the exact date expiration starts depends on when you first ran a Firefox build that included timestamp support&#8230; Other common Form History Expiration Days may begin on June 6th (Dec. 8th + 180 days), and October 18th (Apr. 21st + 180 days). The latter will be extra special, since that&#8217;s the case that will apply to the bulk of our 1/4 billion Firefox users (most of whom will hopefully have upgraded to Firefox 3.5 by then).</p>
<p>Why do form history expiration at all? Three main reasons: privacy, relevance, and performance. Privacy and relevance are fairly obvious &#8212; retaining data forever isn&#8217;t good practice, and data unused for 6 months is highly unlikely to be relevant in the future. Performance is interesting&#8230; In my personal profile, I currently have 27,600 form history entries, with 12,700 of those from Google searches alone! Trudging through all that data takes time; in some cases an autocomplete dropdown can take hundreds of milliseconds to appear on my laptop. If I expire the data older than 180 days, those numbers drop dramatically &#8212; 4,600 entries / 1,800 from Google. This will immediately help improve form autocomplete performance, and help allow us to do more complex queries in the future (to improve the relevancy of the autocomplete results that we offer &#8212; stay tuned!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/05/13/happy-form-history-expiration-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World&#8217;s Cutest Animal</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/03/28/worlds-cutest-animal/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/03/28/worlds-cutest-animal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dolske</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuzzy Friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlanetMozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the Houston Zoo is debuting the &#8220;World&#8217;s Cutest Animal&#8220;. It&#8217;s a red panda, also known as a Firefox.
Everybody say &#8220;awwwwww!&#8221;


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today the Houston Zoo is debuting the &#8220;<a href="http://www.houstonzoo.org/en/photos/albums/v/43">World&#8217;s Cutest Animal</a>&#8220;. It&#8217;s a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Panda">red panda</a>, also known as a Firefox.</p>
<p>Everybody say &#8220;awwwwww!&#8221;</p>
<p><img src="http://people.mozilla.com/~dolske/blogimg/redpanda-1.jpg"></p>
<p><img src="http://people.mozilla.com/~dolske/blogimg/redpanda-2.jpg"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/03/28/worlds-cutest-animal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the tree green, mobile edition.</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/02/13/is-the-tree-green-mobile-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/02/13/is-the-tree-green-mobile-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dolske</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlanetMozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I finally found a use for my N800 (which has been been sitting unused for some time). It&#8217;s now perched on my desk, under my monitor, giving me instant, up-to-the-minute status of the tree&#8230; Yep, that&#8217;s Fennec and http://isthetreegreen.com.
Sadly, the main observation from this is that the tree is almost never green these days. :-(
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/dolske/3277523748/"><img src="http://people.mozilla.com/~dolske/blogimg/n800ittg.jpg"></a></p>
<p>I finally found a use for my N800 (which has been been sitting unused for some time). It&#8217;s now perched on my desk, under my monitor, giving me instant, up-to-the-minute status of the <a href="http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/Firefox/">tree</a>&#8230; Yep, that&#8217;s Fennec and <a href="http://isthetreegreen.com/">http://isthetreegreen.com</a>.</p>
<p>Sadly, the main observation from this is that the tree is almost never green these days. :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2009/02/13/is-the-tree-green-mobile-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
