<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The User Interface of Firefox 3: Features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/01/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/01/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/</link>
	<description>User Experience Design at Mozilla</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 05:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ali</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/01/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-73158</link>
		<dc:creator>ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 05:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/02/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-73158</guid>
		<description>I really need fit to width extension!!! or something that could do it for firefox 3 like opera!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really need fit to width extension!!! or something that could do it for firefox 3 like opera!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gurtan</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/01/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-70420</link>
		<dc:creator>Gurtan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/02/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-70420</guid>
		<description>I would like to agree with post #68 by Josh McConnel on June 4th. 

He mentions how all in the text in Firefox appears jagged when compared to IE7 (IE7 appears to have some sort of "text smoothing" implementation). 

As a user of IE for the past 15 years, I switched over from IE because of the crashes and instabilty, and so far Firefox is a decent browser. But one thing about Firefox is the text looks ugly in comparrison and for me this is really distracting and jarring because the display of text is important  - the world wide web  mostly concerns lots of text and reading of that text, afterall. 

I am using a widescreen Samsung LCD SyncMAster 940mw screen with settings at max resolution 1440 X 900, and the text is jaggy.  

I realise Firefox is open source, but I simply don't have the programming knowledge or skill to code this add-on myself, so i really hope we see a text smoothing feature or filter in future updates to make the words look lush and comfortable on the eyes. 

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to agree with post #68 by Josh McConnel on June 4th. </p>
<p>He mentions how all in the text in Firefox appears jagged when compared to IE7 (IE7 appears to have some sort of &#8220;text smoothing&#8221; implementation). </p>
<p>As a user of IE for the past 15 years, I switched over from IE because of the crashes and instabilty, and so far Firefox is a decent browser. But one thing about Firefox is the text looks ugly in comparrison and for me this is really distracting and jarring because the display of text is important  - the world wide web  mostly concerns lots of text and reading of that text, afterall. </p>
<p>I am using a widescreen Samsung LCD SyncMAster 940mw screen with settings at max resolution 1440 X 900, and the text is jaggy.  </p>
<p>I realise Firefox is open source, but I simply don&#8217;t have the programming knowledge or skill to code this add-on myself, so i really hope we see a text smoothing feature or filter in future updates to make the words look lush and comfortable on the eyes. </p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonno</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/01/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-70058</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/02/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-70058</guid>
		<description>I agree with Comocho: FF needs the equivalent of IE's ability to save web pages as a single file (mht). I want to be able to select &#38; copy text from saved web pages, so image capture doesn't do it. Also, on some sites FF's option to save as "Web Page Complete" assigns a non-descriptive name such as a numerical string as the name of the page. It's a bit annoying to have to exit FF &#38; go into IE every time you want to save a page.

And it would be nice to be able to put an Outlook Express button on the Navigation toolbar, to check e-mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Comocho: FF needs the equivalent of IE&#8217;s ability to save web pages as a single file (mht). I want to be able to select &amp; copy text from saved web pages, so image capture doesn&#8217;t do it. Also, on some sites FF&#8217;s option to save as &#8220;Web Page Complete&#8221; assigns a non-descriptive name such as a numerical string as the name of the page. It&#8217;s a bit annoying to have to exit FF &amp; go into IE every time you want to save a page.</p>
<p>And it would be nice to be able to put an Outlook Express button on the Navigation toolbar, to check e-mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/01/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-69631</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/02/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-69631</guid>
		<description>well done</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well done</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Murphy</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/01/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-68148</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/02/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-68148</guid>
		<description>my favicon is blue, godaddy and paypal is green, i have a rapidssl ssl, what does it take to make mine become green someone i know has a verisign ssl and they have blue too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my favicon is blue, godaddy and paypal is green, i have a rapidssl ssl, what does it take to make mine become green someone i know has a verisign ssl and they have blue too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/01/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-67032</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/02/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-67032</guid>
		<description>Does this have version of Firefox have profiled browsing? Similar to the one Netscape used to have? Each user having their own personal space for bookmarks/passwords, etc will be a nice feature to see in FF3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this have version of Firefox have profiled browsing? Similar to the one Netscape used to have? Each user having their own personal space for bookmarks/passwords, etc will be a nice feature to see in FF3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Samuel</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/01/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-62053</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/02/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-62053</guid>
		<description>The blog post doesn't provide much on two things that show up in the goals list, and are longstanding weaknesses of Firefox: stability and printing.  Is there actually significant improvement in these areas?  Does it no longer crash all the time?  Will it now print most pages properly, instead of placing different parts of a page on different pages when they should be together?  Has the bug that makes it stick on landscape mode been finally fixed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blog post doesn&#8217;t provide much on two things that show up in the goals list, and are longstanding weaknesses of Firefox: stability and printing.  Is there actually significant improvement in these areas?  Does it no longer crash all the time?  Will it now print most pages properly, instead of placing different parts of a page on different pages when they should be together?  Has the bug that makes it stick on landscape mode been finally fixed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gregory</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/01/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-58448</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/02/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-58448</guid>
		<description>Please restore Favicons.  I usually run FF with about 15 tabs for sites I frequently visit.  Without Favicons, the tabs don't fit on the page!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please restore Favicons.  I usually run FF with about 15 tabs for sites I frequently visit.  Without Favicons, the tabs don&#8217;t fit on the page!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parag Gadkari</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/01/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-58221</link>
		<dc:creator>Parag Gadkari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/02/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-58221</guid>
		<description>Although, it is a nice feature to block websites based on google's ratings but IMHO the ultimate users should have their say in deciding whether to launch the alleged web site. I didn't see any option to launch the blocked site. It is as if Mozilla and ultimately Google is trying to control your online identity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although, it is a nice feature to block websites based on google&#8217;s ratings but IMHO the ultimate users should have their say in deciding whether to launch the alleged web site. I didn&#8217;t see any option to launch the blocked site. It is as if Mozilla and ultimately Google is trying to control your online identity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/01/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-26688</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/06/02/the-user-interface-of-firefox-3-features/#comment-26688</guid>
		<description>I'd hate to see the favicon removed from the location bar. It's how I bookmark 95% of the time (drag and drop), and I just generally like it there because it always has been.

The "Security Lock" shows up on the right side of the location bar with a yellow background when the site's security is valid. You'd have to be a total n00b (excuse the slang) to fall for something like that.

At least give us the option to display a favicon if we want to. I might actually choose to stick with FX2 if this happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d hate to see the favicon removed from the location bar. It&#8217;s how I bookmark 95% of the time (drag and drop), and I just generally like it there because it always has been.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Security Lock&#8221; shows up on the right side of the location bar with a yellow background when the site&#8217;s security is valid. You&#8217;d have to be a total n00b (excuse the slang) to fall for something like that.</p>
<p>At least give us the option to display a favicon if we want to. I might actually choose to stick with FX2 if this happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
