<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keyhole Coming to OS X and Windows Themes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/</link>
	<description>User Experience Design at Mozilla</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: inaneframe</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-31649</link>
		<dc:creator>inaneframe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-31649</guid>
		<description>I don't know about anyone else but I think that the history drop icon idea is a curse.

I always remove them and simply right click the back or forward button if I need the history.

Allow us to remove the arrow drop down easily and keep the right click ability and I will love this even if you bring it to Linux. I still want to be able to switch back like Bielawski said though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about anyone else but I think that the history drop icon idea is a curse.</p>
<p>I always remove them and simply right click the back or forward button if I need the history.</p>
<p>Allow us to remove the arrow drop down easily and keep the right click ability and I will love this even if you bring it to Linux. I still want to be able to switch back like Bielawski said though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pd</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-31478</link>
		<dc:creator>pd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-31478</guid>
		<description>An easy option for the back history would be to mirror *just* part of the right hand "background etch containing the drop marker". I think this would also be a lot clearer for the end user.

My amateur example can be seen here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/24034413@N00/2227742337/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An easy option for the back history would be to mirror *just* part of the right hand &#8220;background etch containing the drop marker&#8221;. I think this would also be a lot clearer for the end user.</p>
<p>My amateur example can be seen here:<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/24034413@N00/2227742337/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/24034413@N00/2227742337/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pd</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-31470</link>
		<dc:creator>pd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-31470</guid>
		<description>I quite like this, even though I like to split my forward a back buttons on to opposite ends of the menu bar.

I think it's looks very nice, clean and the functionality seems that is will be clear and obvious.

It's better than the version with the history in the middle, which I think was too cramped and cluttered (something that might have been fixable with more margin/padding).

One problem could be that people think a drop menu is only available for forward navigation. However eventually they should be able to understand since the forward button is clearly inside what is attached to the back button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite like this, even though I like to split my forward a back buttons on to opposite ends of the menu bar.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s looks very nice, clean and the functionality seems that is will be clear and obvious.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s better than the version with the history in the middle, which I think was too cramped and cluttered (something that might have been fixable with more margin/padding).</p>
<p>One problem could be that people think a drop menu is only available for forward navigation. However eventually they should be able to understand since the forward button is clearly inside what is attached to the back button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olaf</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-30167</link>
		<dc:creator>Olaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 02:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-30167</guid>
		<description>That looks a lot like the Flock star button design.

Greetings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looks a lot like the Flock star button design.</p>
<p>Greetings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ibrahim</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-30154</link>
		<dc:creator>Ibrahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-30154</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think the history in the middle makes more sense but I don't know. Funnily, this looks more like IE7 except for the asymmetrical back/forward button sizes. But either way, combining the back/forward histories just makes sense since it's a separation of information that really should just be together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think the history in the middle makes more sense but I don&#8217;t know. Funnily, this looks more like IE7 except for the asymmetrical back/forward button sizes. But either way, combining the back/forward histories just makes sense since it&#8217;s a separation of information that really should just be together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mephiles</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-30083</link>
		<dc:creator>Mephiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-30083</guid>
		<description>I prefered the original idea where the arrows would come appart from eachother, revealing the history button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefered the original idea where the arrows would come appart from eachother, revealing the history button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBrahim</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-29965</link>
		<dc:creator>IBrahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-29965</guid>
		<description>Looks cool, can't wait to see it in action. I think the combined back/forward history is one of the things IE7 gets right, and it would be great in Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks cool, can&#8217;t wait to see it in action. I think the combined back/forward history is one of the things IE7 gets right, and it would be great in Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bielawski</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-29737</link>
		<dc:creator>Bielawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-29737</guid>
		<description>All that's OK if there's an easy way to revert them to normal, sequential, rectangular buttons (like Fx3/GTK). I don't want a different look every time I reboot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All that&#8217;s OK if there&#8217;s an easy way to revert them to normal, sequential, rectangular buttons (like Fx3/GTK). I don&#8217;t want a different look every time I reboot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJR</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-29380</link>
		<dc:creator>IJR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-29380</guid>
		<description>Why is Linux keeping those GTK old fashion navigation buttons? Doesn't make sense because they are also ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Linux keeping those GTK old fashion navigation buttons? Doesn&#8217;t make sense because they are also ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SkylarP</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-29263</link>
		<dc:creator>SkylarP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/01/17/keyhole-coming-to-os-x-and-windows-themes/#comment-29263</guid>
		<description>It looks great to me, and the fact that you guys have tapped the Iconfactory gives me great hope for the final product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks great to me, and the fact that you guys have tapped the Iconfactory gives me great hope for the final product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
