<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Firefox Icon: Concept Rendering by Stephen Horlander</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/05/17/new-firefox-icon-concept-rendering-by-stephen-horlander/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/05/17/new-firefox-icon-concept-rendering-by-stephen-horlander/</link>
	<description>User Experience Design at Mozilla</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:10:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matson</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/05/17/new-firefox-icon-concept-rendering-by-stephen-horlander/comment-page-2/#comment-137763</link>
		<dc:creator>Matson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 09:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=119#comment-137763</guid>
		<description>I like this one too:D
especially the light spotting on blue earth and the effects</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this one too:D<br />
especially the light spotting on blue earth and the effects</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/05/17/new-firefox-icon-concept-rendering-by-stephen-horlander/comment-page-2/#comment-137750</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=119#comment-137750</guid>
		<description>This is by far the best, an actual improvement over the current logo. Everything else through iteration 5 sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is by far the best, an actual improvement over the current logo. Everything else through iteration 5 sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Shirshin</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/05/17/new-firefox-icon-concept-rendering-by-stephen-horlander/comment-page-2/#comment-137642</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shirshin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=119#comment-137642</guid>
		<description>This is too unbalanced, in my opinion (mostly in terms of color temperature which is too &quot;hot&quot; on Firefox itself and too &quot;cold&quot; on the globe).

In any case, the high-res icons aren&#039;t the most important ones. The rendering of 16x16 and 32x32 icons is the new cool design everybody will notice. In terms of professional icon design, it is strange that each of the bigger images is not accopmanied with smaller variants. It is well known that many people can design a 128x128 icons, but fewer can successfully scale it back to 16x16.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is too unbalanced, in my opinion (mostly in terms of color temperature which is too &#8220;hot&#8221; on Firefox itself and too &#8220;cold&#8221; on the globe).</p>
<p>In any case, the high-res icons aren&#8217;t the most important ones. The rendering of 16&#215;16 and 32&#215;32 icons is the new cool design everybody will notice. In terms of professional icon design, it is strange that each of the bigger images is not accopmanied with smaller variants. It is well known that many people can design a 128&#215;128 icons, but fewer can successfully scale it back to 16&#215;16.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/05/17/new-firefox-icon-concept-rendering-by-stephen-horlander/comment-page-2/#comment-137595</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 10:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=119#comment-137595</guid>
		<description>Hi,

looks quite nice. The problem I have with the current (FF &lt;= 3.0) icon is that it it is to detailed too look nice in, say, the quick launch area. An overall reduction of detail and making it &quot;sharper&quot; would surely be a great improvement. I think you are going into the right direction with this. Maybe if you can manage to make the fox a bit slimmer - that would surely improve it&#039;s appeal when scaled to, say, 16x16 pixels. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>looks quite nice. The problem I have with the current (FF &lt;= 3.0) icon is that it it is to detailed too look nice in, say, the quick launch area. An overall reduction of detail and making it &#8220;sharper&#8221; would surely be a great improvement. I think you are going into the right direction with this. Maybe if you can manage to make the fox a bit slimmer &#8211; that would surely improve it&#8217;s appeal when scaled to, say, 16&#215;16 pixels. <img src='http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/05/17/new-firefox-icon-concept-rendering-by-stephen-horlander/comment-page-2/#comment-137594</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 10:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=119#comment-137594</guid>
		<description>Very nice! Best one yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice! Best one yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/05/17/new-firefox-icon-concept-rendering-by-stephen-horlander/comment-page-2/#comment-137569</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=119#comment-137569</guid>
		<description>It just feels less distinct overall.

First, the globe is really shiny. That white continent isn&#039;t helping. http://tango.freedesktop.org/Tango_Icon_Theme_Guidelines#Frequent_Mistakes

Second, the icon has lost a lot of contrast. I still really like the colors from the 2004/Firefox 0.8 icon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just feels less distinct overall.</p>
<p>First, the globe is really shiny. That white continent isn&#8217;t helping. <a href="http://tango.freedesktop.org/Tango_Icon_Theme_Guidelines#Frequent_Mistakes" rel="nofollow">http://tango.freedesktop.org/Tango_Icon_Theme_Guidelines#Frequent_Mistakes</a></p>
<p>Second, the icon has lost a lot of contrast. I still really like the colors from the 2004/Firefox 0.8 icon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuss</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/05/17/new-firefox-icon-concept-rendering-by-stephen-horlander/comment-page-2/#comment-137527</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=119#comment-137527</guid>
		<description>I really think this is the best one yet. Perhaps the changes in this one compared to the current logo are too subtle, which could make the &quot;visual indication of progress&quot; less efficient.

But aesthetically, I think this one takes the prize by a long shot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think this is the best one yet. Perhaps the changes in this one compared to the current logo are too subtle, which could make the &#8220;visual indication of progress&#8221; less efficient.</p>
<p>But aesthetically, I think this one takes the prize by a long shot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bent Rendal</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/05/17/new-firefox-icon-concept-rendering-by-stephen-horlander/comment-page-2/#comment-137516</link>
		<dc:creator>Bent Rendal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=119#comment-137516</guid>
		<description>Hi!
I think there&#039;s something with the balance in the logo, between the fox and the globe. Could the fox be transparent to some degree?
Bent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!<br />
I think there&#8217;s something with the balance in the logo, between the fox and the globe. Could the fox be transparent to some degree?<br />
Bent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Lizard</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/05/17/new-firefox-icon-concept-rendering-by-stephen-horlander/comment-page-2/#comment-137515</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Lizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=119#comment-137515</guid>
		<description>Fox is looking good, but the globe is now blurred and waaaayy to reflective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox is looking good, but the globe is now blurred and waaaayy to reflective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/05/17/new-firefox-icon-concept-rendering-by-stephen-horlander/comment-page-2/#comment-137511</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=119#comment-137511</guid>
		<description>Type your comment here.

Good Work!!

And I think exactly like #2 said:
The globe is too bright and blurry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Type your comment here.</p>
<p>Good Work!!</p>
<p>And I think exactly like #2 said:<br />
The globe is too bright and blurry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
