<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Firefox Icon: Iterations 11 to 14</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/06/02/new-firefox-icon-iterations-11-to-14/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/06/02/new-firefox-icon-iterations-11-to-14/</link>
	<description>User Experience Design at Mozilla</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:10:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MidwestGuy</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/06/02/new-firefox-icon-iterations-11-to-14/comment-page-1/#comment-144373</link>
		<dc:creator>MidwestGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=177#comment-144373</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got to be kidding me. Why fuss so much over an icon? They all pretty much look the same to me. If you had spent more time fixing the slow startup problem, and less time worrying about tiny details to the stupid icon -- you&#039;d have a lot fewer ticked-off people right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got to be kidding me. Why fuss so much over an icon? They all pretty much look the same to me. If you had spent more time fixing the slow startup problem, and less time worrying about tiny details to the stupid icon &#8212; you&#8217;d have a lot fewer ticked-off people right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Sisson</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/06/02/new-firefox-icon-iterations-11-to-14/comment-page-1/#comment-141003</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Sisson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=177#comment-141003</guid>
		<description>I really like 14. The asymmetrical reflection is unique and really works, I think. The only problem with it is, as mak77 (#8) mentioned, the reflection line looks as if starting from his nose, though I hadn&#039;t noticed this until I read mak77&#039;s comment.

Additionally, I think the fur on the snout is a bit too scruffy. It could be simplified some please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like 14. The asymmetrical reflection is unique and really works, I think. The only problem with it is, as mak77 (#8) mentioned, the reflection line looks as if starting from his nose, though I hadn&#8217;t noticed this until I read mak77&#8217;s comment.</p>
<p>Additionally, I think the fur on the snout is a bit too scruffy. It could be simplified some please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/06/02/new-firefox-icon-iterations-11-to-14/comment-page-1/#comment-139440</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=177#comment-139440</guid>
		<description>My favorite is 12-2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite is 12-2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeus</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/06/02/new-firefox-icon-iterations-11-to-14/comment-page-1/#comment-139394</link>
		<dc:creator>zeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=177#comment-139394</guid>
		<description>12.1 is my favorite ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>12.1 is my favorite <img src='http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/06/02/new-firefox-icon-iterations-11-to-14/comment-page-1/#comment-139337</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=177#comment-139337</guid>
		<description>Iteration 12-2 looks best - nicely lit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iteration 12-2 looks best &#8211; nicely lit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitin</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/06/02/new-firefox-icon-iterations-11-to-14/comment-page-1/#comment-139298</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 04:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=177#comment-139298</guid>
		<description>The asymmetrical reflections in #13 and #14 could perhaps do with a slight gradient or diffusion, so that it doesn&#039;t look so sharp.  I like the idea, but its just not done well enough yet.

Icon/logo design is not about creating reality.  Its about playing with reality.  The fox is certainly not a realistic representation of an actual fox, but one can recognize it as being a foxy and fiery character.  The same goes for the globe.  If it has a reflection or shine, it doesn&#039;t matter if it has a crystal-ball look.  Its about it being delightful, playful and fun.  We shouldn&#039;t judge something as &#039;bad&#039; simply because it doesn&#039;t look like pure reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The asymmetrical reflections in #13 and #14 could perhaps do with a slight gradient or diffusion, so that it doesn&#8217;t look so sharp.  I like the idea, but its just not done well enough yet.</p>
<p>Icon/logo design is not about creating reality.  Its about playing with reality.  The fox is certainly not a realistic representation of an actual fox, but one can recognize it as being a foxy and fiery character.  The same goes for the globe.  If it has a reflection or shine, it doesn&#8217;t matter if it has a crystal-ball look.  Its about it being delightful, playful and fun.  We shouldn&#8217;t judge something as &#8216;bad&#8217; simply because it doesn&#8217;t look like pure reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/06/02/new-firefox-icon-iterations-11-to-14/comment-page-1/#comment-139269</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 23:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=177#comment-139269</guid>
		<description>Wow, I&#039;m suspired I&#039;m the only one who likes the asymmetrical highlight, even if it&#039;s a bit strong right now, I like the lines. It feels like it gives the globe a bit more energy and feels less like a cliched aqua ball.

The simplicity of 12-3 is appealing though. In 12-1 The highlight seems too harsh towards the top and the added gradients on 12-3 break it up a little.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I&#8217;m suspired I&#8217;m the only one who likes the asymmetrical highlight, even if it&#8217;s a bit strong right now, I like the lines. It feels like it gives the globe a bit more energy and feels less like a cliched aqua ball.</p>
<p>The simplicity of 12-3 is appealing though. In 12-1 The highlight seems too harsh towards the top and the added gradients on 12-3 break it up a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/06/02/new-firefox-icon-iterations-11-to-14/comment-page-1/#comment-139264</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=177#comment-139264</guid>
		<description>I agree with the previous posts that the shape of the reflection in #13 &amp; #14 looks a bit weird. The &#039;S&#039; shape almost looks like some sort of subliminal message. Other than that, AWESOME!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the previous posts that the shape of the reflection in #13 &amp; #14 looks a bit weird. The &#8216;S&#8217; shape almost looks like some sort of subliminal message. Other than that, AWESOME!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hasdrubal</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/06/02/new-firefox-icon-iterations-11-to-14/comment-page-1/#comment-139258</link>
		<dc:creator>hasdrubal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=177#comment-139258</guid>
		<description>12.1 is quite good ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>12.1 is quite good &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerv</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2009/06/02/new-firefox-icon-iterations-11-to-14/comment-page-1/#comment-139251</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/?p=177#comment-139251</guid>
		<description>11 or 12-1 (I can&#039;t spot much difference). Darker and no highlight is good; the globe is not a billiard ball.

Gerv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>11 or 12-1 (I can&#8217;t spot much difference). Darker and no highlight is good; the globe is not a billiard ball.</p>
<p>Gerv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
