Comments on: the cost of monoculture http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/ Gen Kanai's Mozilla weblog Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:22:07 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Pavel http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/comment-page-1/#comment-73084 Pavel Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:01:22 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/#comment-73084 The real problem they have, even if Mozilla plugin is officially supported and legislation fixed, is that all Web developers will be surprised to know that their code is not working the same in different browsers. Sometimes it doesn't work at all. They'll need to deal with that, and fixing that might be a real pain. The real problem they have, even if Mozilla plugin is officially supported and legislation fixed, is that all Web developers will be surprised to know that their code is not working the same in different browsers. Sometimes it doesn’t work at all.
They’ll need to deal with that, and fixing that might be a real pain.

]]> By: Bassexpander http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/comment-page-1/#comment-71900 Bassexpander Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:27:04 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/#comment-71900 As someone living in Korea, I'll bet you my best pair of socks that some Korean with money/influence has a family member who makes heaps of money off of keeping all control of people's computers. That's often how it works in Korea. If the current system were to change, someone with power would lose money. That cannot be allowed by those making the money. As someone living in Korea, I’ll bet you my best pair of socks that some Korean with money/influence has a family member who makes heaps of money off of keeping all control of people’s computers. That’s often how it works in Korea. If the current system were to change, someone with power would lose money. That cannot be allowed by those making the money.

]]> By: err http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/comment-page-1/#comment-23078 err Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:53:27 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/#comment-23078 Dan and Crowder this is not just a problem for Firefox, it essentially breaks every non Microsoft product on the planet. To re engineer every Browser on the planet to support one encryption system in one country would be throwing allot time and money at a problem with a relatively simple fix. just use the same superior open system as the rest of the world. Also you underestimate the legal and technical issues involved in building and maintaining your own version of a closed source product (Active X) that Microsoft owns. Dan and Crowder this is not just a problem for Firefox, it essentially breaks every non Microsoft product on the planet.
To re engineer every Browser on the planet to support one encryption system in one country would be throwing allot time and money at a problem with a relatively simple fix. just use the same superior open system as the rest of the world.
Also you underestimate the legal and technical issues involved in building and maintaining your own version of a closed source product (Active X) that Microsoft owns.

]]> By: dan http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/comment-page-1/#comment-22789 dan Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:27:50 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/#comment-22789 "adding support for Active-X in Firefox opens Mozilla up to a whole host of issues where there is little benefit" Little benefit? I think your article does well enough to explain the huge problem; would solving this partly not be even a small benefit? I'd, and your article, would say so. “adding support for Active-X in Firefox opens Mozilla up to a whole host of issues where there is little benefit”
Little benefit? I think your article does well enough to explain the huge problem; would solving this partly not be even a small benefit? I’d, and your article, would say so.

]]> By: Simon http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/comment-page-1/#comment-1172 Simon Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:11:45 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/#comment-1172 Enabling ActiveX support in Firefox, so missed the monoculture issue. ActiveX support in Firefox only works in Microsoft Windows, and presumably for these controls only in XP or earlier. My operating system of choice fixes all reported security issues, in all shipped applications, BEFORE they release a new version. MacOSX has never had a virus in the wild. Koreans presumably would like to be able to choose such an operating system for their online banking, rather than Microsoft's "we fix them after they start being exploited" approach to security. Enabling ActiveX support in Firefox, so missed the monoculture issue.

ActiveX support in Firefox only works in Microsoft Windows, and presumably for these controls only in XP or earlier.

My operating system of choice fixes all reported security issues, in all shipped applications, BEFORE they release a new version.

MacOSX has never had a virus in the wild.

Koreans presumably would like to be able to choose such an operating system for their online banking, rather than Microsoft’s “we fix them after they start being exploited” approach to security.

]]> By: sententia fredericiana » Von den Kosten einer Monokultur http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/comment-page-1/#comment-13 sententia fredericiana » Von den Kosten einer Monokultur Fri, 09 Mar 2007 08:34:09 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/#comment-13 [...] Gen Kanai, von Mozilla Japan, hat jüngst einen Artikel gebloggt von seinen Erfahrungen bei einem Besuch in Südkorea. “The cost of monoculture” hat er ihn getauft, und er handelt von der einzigartigen Internetlandschaft dort und von den Problemen, denen das “technologische Wunderland” gerade entgegensieht. Auszüge (Übersetzung von mir): Was würden Sie sagen wenn ich Ihnen erzähle, dass es ein Land gibt, das ein technologischer Vorreiter ist, als einer der Ersten E-Commerce eingeführt hat, Weltführer bei der Einführung von Mobiltelefonen der dritten Generation, beim kabellosen Breitband-Internet und bei Breitbandanschlüssen ist, und außerdem bei Blogs etc ganz vorne mitspielt. Klingt nach einem tollen Ort, oder? Ein technologisches Wunderland, reine Utopie? [...] [...] Gen Kanai, von Mozilla Japan, hat jüngst einen Artikel gebloggt von seinen Erfahrungen bei einem Besuch in Südkorea. “The cost of monoculture” hat er ihn getauft, und er handelt von der einzigartigen Internetlandschaft dort und von den Problemen, denen das “technologische Wunderland” gerade entgegensieht. Auszüge (Übersetzung von mir): Was würden Sie sagen wenn ich Ihnen erzähle, dass es ein Land gibt, das ein technologischer Vorreiter ist, als einer der Ersten E-Commerce eingeführt hat, Weltführer bei der Einführung von Mobiltelefonen der dritten Generation, beim kabellosen Breitband-Internet und bei Breitbandanschlüssen ist, und außerdem bei Blogs etc ganz vorne mitspielt. Klingt nach einem tollen Ort, oder? Ein technologisches Wunderland, reine Utopie? [...]

]]> By: OpenID http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/comment-page-1/#comment-12 OpenID Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:05:03 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/#comment-12 Whatever happened with <a href="http://www.mozilla.or.kr/zine/?p=542" rel="nofollow">this</a>? Whatever happened with this?

]]> By: Brian’s Blog » Blog Archive » Kozilla http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Brian’s Blog » Blog Archive » Kozilla Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:32:40 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/#comment-9 [...] Reading Gen Kanai’s blog-post here makes me think we have a real opportunity in a market we haven’t cracked yet.  What do we need to do to make the Korean SEED Active-X control work in our browser without introducing all the other mayhem which comes with Active-X?  I looked at the source for the Active-X control in our tree and it looks as though some thought has been made for restricting (whitelisting/blacklisting) controls, but in my cursory examination I didn’t find the actual code that uses the preferences documented for this.  I’m not very familiar with this code.  Who is?  How good is our Korean localization, in general?  Am I wrong in thinking this is a very big, very obvious opportunity? [...] [...] Reading Gen Kanai’s blog-post here makes me think we have a real opportunity in a market we haven’t cracked yet.  What do we need to do to make the Korean SEED Active-X control work in our browser without introducing all the other mayhem which comes with Active-X?  I looked at the source for the Active-X control in our tree and it looks as though some thought has been made for restricting (whitelisting/blacklisting) controls, but in my cursory examination I didn’t find the actual code that uses the preferences documented for this.  I’m not very familiar with this code.  Who is?  How good is our Korean localization, in general?  Am I wrong in thinking this is a very big, very obvious opportunity? [...]

]]> By: crowder http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/comment-page-1/#comment-7 crowder Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:53:14 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/#comment-7 Well, as I said, it wouldn't be full ActiveX support. Instead it would be just enough support to handle this one plugin and nothing else... that seems a surmountable problem to me. Well, as I said, it wouldn’t be full ActiveX support. Instead it would be just enough support to handle this one plugin and nothing else… that seems a surmountable problem to me.

]]> By: Gen Kanai http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Gen Kanai Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:54:02 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/#comment-6 crowder, adding support for Active-X in Firefox opens Mozilla up to a whole host of issues where there is little benefit and a lot of risk. It's something we've certainly thought about but cannot recommend. crowder, adding support for Active-X in Firefox opens Mozilla up to a whole host of issues where there is little benefit and a lot of risk. It’s something we’ve certainly thought about but cannot recommend.

]]>