<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camellia cipher added to Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/07/30/camellia-cipher-added-to-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/07/30/camellia-cipher-added-to-firefox/</link>
	<description>Gen Kanai's Mozilla weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: galen</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/07/30/camellia-cipher-added-to-firefox/#comment-11351</link>
		<dc:creator>galen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/07/30/camellia-cipher-added-to-firefox/#comment-11351</guid>
		<description>what is so great about camellia that it must be added to the list of supported ciphers? while bob lord says this should not be done and this is a huge exception, he fails to point out the benefits...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is so great about camellia that it must be added to the list of supported ciphers? while bob lord says this should not be done and this is a huge exception, he fails to point out the benefits&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
