Comments on: browser and web content compatibility in Asia http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/11/08/browser-and-web-content-compatibility-in-asia/ Gen Kanai's Mozilla weblog Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:25:52 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Gen Kanai http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/11/08/browser-and-web-content-compatibility-in-asia/comment-page-1/#comment-14206 Gen Kanai Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:48:07 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/11/08/browser-and-web-content-compatibility-in-asia/#comment-14206 Boris- these are all great comments. I'll ask the editors of the document to reply here if possible. Boris- these are all great comments. I’ll ask the editors of the document to reply here if possible.

]]> By: Boris http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/11/08/browser-and-web-content-compatibility-in-asia/comment-page-1/#comment-14155 Boris Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:50:42 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/11/08/browser-and-web-content-compatibility-in-asia/#comment-14155 It's interesting to me that there are a number of errors in this document. Things like claiming that Firefox supports "lowsrc" or "suppress" on . Or that Firefox doesn't support . Or that Firefox doesn't support ! I stopped reading around page 17, and saw those problems right off the top of my head. That's not including things like our upcoming support of contentEditable, etc. I really wonder how these people managed to decide that Firefox doesn't support marquee. It’s interesting to me that there are a number of errors in this document. Things like claiming that Firefox supports “lowsrc” or “suppress” on . Or that Firefox doesn’t support . Or that Firefox doesn’t support ! I stopped reading around page 17, and saw those problems right off the top of my head.

That’s not including things like our upcoming support of contentEditable, etc.

I really wonder how these people managed to decide that Firefox doesn’t support marquee.

]]>