Comments on: The Early Rise of Firefox 3 Adoption http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/22/the-early-rise-of-firefox-3-adoption/ When in doubt, sample it out... Fri, 09 Jan 2009 08:16:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: pd http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/22/the-early-rise-of-firefox-3-adoption/#comment-16123 pd Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:17:37 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/22/the-early-rise-of-firefox-3-adoption/#comment-16123 one way to look at it is that Firefox 2 performance e was so crappy, those who are passionate enough to still hate the opposition will be inclined to give Fx3 a go. Luckily it seems to finally improve perf to a satisfactory level. Otherwise your beta levels for Fx3 might have seen a big downturn. one way to look at it is that Firefox 2 performance e was so crappy, those who are passionate enough to still hate the opposition will be inclined to give Fx3 a go. Luckily it seems to finally improve perf to a satisfactory level. Otherwise your beta levels for Fx3 might have seen a big downturn.

]]> By: Bob the Milkman http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/22/the-early-rise-of-firefox-3-adoption/#comment-16084 Bob the Milkman Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:25:26 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/22/the-early-rise-of-firefox-3-adoption/#comment-16084 I like lots of features of firefox 3, and I use it, but it is a good thing it's still a beta - I have been getting crashes and such with b5. Unfortunately, many extension developers have not been keeping up with the frequent updating of the program :( I like lots of features of firefox 3, and I use it, but it is a good thing it’s still a beta - I have been getting crashes and such with b5. Unfortunately, many extension developers have not been keeping up with the frequent updating of the program :(

]]> By: boemer http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/22/the-early-rise-of-firefox-3-adoption/#comment-16010 boemer Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:02:25 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/22/the-early-rise-of-firefox-3-adoption/#comment-16010 I think Firefox 1.5 was okay, Firefox 2.0 was not really an improvement. (For example the setInterval/setTimeout was a complete catastroph. Firefox 3.0 is faster, looks great on a mac, and just rocks... The only problem it is still a beta.... I think Firefox 1.5 was okay, Firefox 2.0 was not really an improvement. (For example the setInterval/setTimeout was a complete catastroph.

Firefox 3.0 is faster, looks great on a mac, and just rocks…

The only problem it is still a beta….

]]>