January, 2009


30
Jan 09

Will We Eventually See a Firefox Super Bowl Ad?

As we’re just a couple days away from the Super Bowl, David Rolnitzky (one of our brilliant marketers) and I wanted to go through the fun exercise of having a point/counterpoint discussion around the possibility of Firefox commercial debuting during a future game.  I’ll outline a few points below in favor of such a possibility, and then respond to David’s well articulated thoughts (coming soon in an update below).

  1. Before all else, any effort and decision making around a Super Bowl commercial would be community enabled and driven by the Mozilla community.  In other words, something similar in spirit to the NYTimes ad for the Firefox 1 launch.
  2. Firefox is a mainstream brand (one of the biggest in the world) and would benefit as much as any other brand from a mainstream ad channel.  In other words, we’re not Sales Genie with a niche product or service.
  3. The story of the process behind our ad and of our community decision to have an ad would generate more than $10 million in press.  Go Daddy generated this return during a couple recent years.
  4. Production costs would be zero.  We’d be able to use an already produced ad from Firefox Flicks.  My personal favorite is Daredevil (below).
  5. Retention marketing has consistently been a challenge for Mozilla.  There are limited opportunities of this size and scale for us to remind existing users that they have a choice beyond the blue e.

Update: David Rolnitzky has a comprehensive counterpoint here.  I actually agree with most of what he says, but if you’re interested in a rebuttal, Justin Scott entered the conversation taking on David’s points and supporting the idea of a Firefox Super Bowl commercial.


30
Jan 09

Firefox Retention – has it changed over time?

Thanks to recent editions of Funnelcake, along with two editions from 2007, we can now start to think about our ability to retain Firefox users over time.  In other words, if a user downloads and installs Firefox today, what are the odds of that user firing up their Firefox browser one month from today? six months from today? and has our retention ability and the experience of Firefox users changed over time?

Answering such questions can better inform our decision making – decision making across the Mozilla Project, from product decisions, to UI and UX decisions, to community specific decisions.

With this introduction aside, let’s dive into the analysis and insights.  First, let’s look at our most recent Funnelcake cohorts, i.e., those users who downloaded Firefox on Monday, December 15th and on Tuesday, January 13th.   The chart below shows that of those who successfully installed Firefox, the percentage who actively used it on a particular day since then:

The rate at which these two groups of users continued using Firefox on a day-to-day basis is fairly similar.  The group who installed Firefox on December 15th was affected by the holiday season, so we cheated a bit by ignoring about ten days around that time period to avoid having seasonality take us away from the broader story here.  You’ll notice that the peaks and valleys are slightly off, which is due to the day of week factors being off by one day.

As we’ve noted previously, Firefox is very, very sticky.  The fact that so many new users continue using it each and every day is an amazing testament to the strength and health of our communities.

Taking one other look at this data, we can make a comparison with similar groups of new users who first started using Firefox back in the fall of 2007.  As the internet population has grown and as Firefox has improved, has our ability to retain new users changed in any way?  Looking at previous analysis of those users – here and here – you’ll notice that at the 30-day mark after installation, we were seeing about 49% of original installers as active daily users.  Our new data above from the December and January cohorts suggests this rate is close to 44%.

How should we interpret this difference?

  • First, we should be careful here.  The two sets of installation numbers (from 2007 and from present day) are coming from two different web analytics solutions.  The difference could be attributable solely to the measurement methodologies or reporting abilities of such solutions.
  • Second, if we are to believe this difference could be real, it could suggest that as Firefox has reached more mainstream internet users (e.g, my parents), our ability to retain new users has changed.

Your thoughts?


29
Jan 09

What Happens When an Opera User Downloads Firefox?

Continuing our series of analysis based on the most recent edition of Funnelcake, we want to examine the experience of users when clicking the download button at mozilla.com – by browser.  In other words, what is the experience of a new Firefox user when he/she first arrives at our site while using Safari?  And is their experience any different than an IE user coming to mozilla.com and downloading Firefox?

First, let’s look at the breakdown of those clicking the Firefox download button (at the mozilla.com home page or main Firefox product page).

The picture above closely resembles the general internet population (i.e., worldwide market share).  I’m not sure if we would have expected to see something different.

Next, let’s examine the experience of each of the segments above.  Of those clicking the download button, how many receive the full data/file and how many don’t?

It doesn’t appear that there are any strong takeaways here.  The samples for Opera and “Other” are fairly small, so we should be cautious in drawing too many conclusions about the experience of those users.  Otherwise, the big three segments are relatively homogeneous.  One might expect the success of an existing Firefox user to be greater, but at the same time, there might be a higher percentage of accidental clicks by these users.


29
Jan 09

mozilla.com – one of the world’s fastest growing sites

We’re excited to be included in comScore’s latest report highlighting the fastest growing web sites.  Specifically, they looked at the top 100 properties on the web and reported on the U.S. sites with the most growth in 2008.

A few things to note:

  • Our own internal web analytics solution shows that our growth in unique visitors was about 50% in 2008 (close to being in the same ballpark as comScore’s findings).
  • As highlighted earlier this week, the vast majority of visits to mozilla.com are “product driven”.  Usage of Firefox grew by nearly 60% in 2008, hence we’d expect the traffic at mozilla.com to rise by a similar percentage.
  • More than 70% of the traffic to our U.S. site comes from outside the U.S.  I’m not sure how this compares with the other popular U.S. sites, but the degree of Firefox’s adoption internationally has certainly aided our site growth (we do also have separate Mozilla web sites in Japan, China, and Europe).

28
Jan 09

Could Mac Users Use Some Help Installing Firefox?

We recently dug into the user’s experience when downloading Firefox, answering questions such as, “of people clicking the Firefox download button at mozilla.com, how many receive the full file and how many complete the installation process?”

With the latest Funnelcake shipment (January 13th), we wanted to take these insights a bit further, and breakdown that question above in several dimensions – by OS, by browser, and by geographical region.  In this post, we’ll focus on the first dimension, i.e., how does the experience of users differ based on operating system?

To start, let’s look at the distribution of users who clicked the download button (on the mozilla.com homepage or main Firefox product page).

There’s nothing too surprising to note here.  This distribution should come close to mirroring the overall population of Firefox users and the population of internet users more generally.

Next, let’s see exactly what happened at the moment of clicking the download button.  You’ll recall from our previous post that we asked, “for every 100 people who initiate the download process, where exactly do they end up just a few moments later?”, and the answer was visualized through the diagram below:

(Note: while the percentages above highlight November’s Funnelcake edition, they remained almost identical in January).

Moving onto the punchline, below is the breakdown of these numbers by OS:

A couple key things to note:

  • There seems to be a substantial difference between Mac and Windows users.  While both groups are able to successfully receive the file at roughly similar rates, the experience of users diverges once they move from downloading to completing the installation.
  • We’re not entirely sure what’s going on with the Linux numbers.  Much more digging needs to be done.

Update: First, we should explain how we measure whether or not a user installs Firefox.  We count an installation as successful when a user visits the Firefox firstrun page.  Given this fact and considering Alix’s point below, it’s clear that Mac installations will be undercounted in this analysis, as Mac users have to manually launch Firefox for the first time in order to be counted as an install, while Windows users automatically hit the firstrun page.


27
Jan 09

How Do Users Interact with mozilla.com?

As we’ve found before, sometimes the simplest analysis can deliver the most startling visualization or impact.  Our latest example revolves around traffic to www.mozilla.com.  Looking at nearly 1.5 Billion page views over the past six months, here is the portfolio of pages visited:

The chart above shows us two different flavors of pages – what I would describe as “product driven” and “user driven”.  Visits to product driven pages are directly associated with the Firefox product itself.  For example, when a user downloads Firefox, he/she automatically hits our download confirmation page (download.html).  When a user successfully installs Firefox, he/she sees our firstrun page.  And when there’s a Firefox update or release, the user hits our whatsnew, or update, page.  These “product driven” page views — the three biggest slices that you see above — account for 70% of the total traffic at www.mozilla.com.

(Please note that the numbers for some pages include both en-US and localized traffic, whereas other pages only apply to en-US.)

Conversely, I would describe “user driven” traffic as a user making a conscious decision to view a particular page.  This includes visits to our homepage, the main Firefox product page, and other typical pages found within the www.mozilla.com site.  This category of pages accounts for 30% of our traffic.

What stands out above?

The Getting Started page. That 40% slice of the pie is driven by users clicking in one of two areas: the bookmark toolbar or a featured link on the firstrun/install page, both instances where users are consciously clicking on something in order to find out more about using Firefox.  More analysis of this page coming soon…


7
Jan 09

A User’s Experience when Downloading Firefox

We recently reinitiated Funnelcake, an effort begun in 2007 to better understand the full cycle of a user’s experience — from visiting www.mozilla.com all the way through to becoming a long-term Firefox user.  We are currently shipping Funnelcake roughly once per month, and we have some new insights to share based on some numbers from November’s edition.

You may recall that, last year, much of our analysis focused on the attrition or churn rate over time, i.e., what are the odds that a new user today continues using Firefox a month from today or six months from today?

For this discussion, we want to focus on another area – what is the experience of a new user at the precise moment he/she clicks on the download button?

At first glance, this may seem like an ultra simple thing to examine.  However, there are indeed different hoops a user has to navigate through at this moment in their experience.  Once a user clicks the download button, he/she is shown a dialog screen related to running or saving the .exe file.  At this moment, two things can happen:

  1. A user succeeds in getting that download file
  2. The user does not receive the full and complete file

Looking at our download mirror data, it appears that roughly 79% of people enjoy success (#1) and about 21% of users experience the latter (#2).

The next step in a user’s experience applies to group #1.  Moving forward, two things can happen to this user:

  1. The user can launch/run the installation file, successfully go through all the steps during installation, and complete the installation process
  2. The user does not complete installation

Looking at the data again, we see that of the users at this stage in the process, 79% of people enjoy success through the installation steps, whereas 21% do not (the 79-21 numbers repeating here is just a coincidence).

An alternate view of this user experience would be to ask, “for every 100 people who initiate the download process, where exactly do they end up just a few moments later?”  Looking at the diagram below, you can see that roughly 21 abandon the process when they don’t receive the full download file, 63 receive the download file and complete the installation process, and 17 receive the download file but don’t complete installation.

So, what are the business insights here?

There are likely some actions we can take to improve the user’s experience during the download and installation process.  I was surprised by the 21% number above… much more digging needs to be done to ensure this is fully accurate and to break this down further (e.g., by OS, by browser, etc.), so that we can start to consider product or UI related changes.  With respect to the 17% number above, we are already taking action.  With the help of Kampyle (a tool for these users to provide feedback), we’re eager to soon have some insights into the potential pain points or thoughts of users at this precise moment in their experience.