<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Firefox Users Still on Fx2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/02/06/some-firefox-users-still-on-fx2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/02/06/some-firefox-users-still-on-fx2/</link>
	<description>When in doubt, sample it out...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:27:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cuz84d</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/02/06/some-firefox-users-still-on-fx2/comment-page-1/#comment-139783</link>
		<dc:creator>cuz84d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=367#comment-139783</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t take a rocket scientist or study to realize what you can test everyday to know FF doesn&#039;t work like IE or any other windows app using standard .net libraries.  FF is written by so many contributors it takes forever to get real bugs fixed, we&#039;re always re-writing and taking out, busting, regressions, and just not attending to real world issues (basic problems like mentioned above)
The API&#039;s are not we&#039;ll documented and not modular enough to solve a lot of issues at once like .NET does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t take a rocket scientist or study to realize what you can test everyday to know FF doesn&#8217;t work like IE or any other windows app using standard .net libraries.  FF is written by so many contributors it takes forever to get real bugs fixed, we&#8217;re always re-writing and taking out, busting, regressions, and just not attending to real world issues (basic problems like mentioned above)<br />
The API&#8217;s are not we&#8217;ll documented and not modular enough to solve a lot of issues at once like .NET does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cuz84d</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/02/06/some-firefox-users-still-on-fx2/comment-page-1/#comment-139781</link>
		<dc:creator>cuz84d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=367#comment-139781</guid>
		<description>Simple.   Start by fixing all the old bugs in FF 3 and up, like performance of FF 3, and FF 3.5, printing for one, installer problems, UI problems .. and plugins and whatever other reason people don&#039;t want to use the new version.

People should be able to skip over performance related versions like 3 and 3.5 and go directly to 3.0.1 or 3.1 or 3.5.4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple.   Start by fixing all the old bugs in FF 3 and up, like performance of FF 3, and FF 3.5, printing for one, installer problems, UI problems .. and plugins and whatever other reason people don&#8217;t want to use the new version.</p>
<p>People should be able to skip over performance related versions like 3 and 3.5 and go directly to 3.0.1 or 3.1 or 3.5.4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Russ</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/02/06/some-firefox-users-still-on-fx2/comment-page-1/#comment-124445</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=367#comment-124445</guid>
		<description>For me, it&#039;s just a case of an old OS.  I&#039;m not paying to upgrade, so I&#039;m stuck with winME.

I&#039;m told that there&#039;s a utility called KernelEx that will let Firefox 3.0 run on older versions of Windows, but it makes my system not boot. :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, it&#8217;s just a case of an old OS.  I&#8217;m not paying to upgrade, so I&#8217;m stuck with winME.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m told that there&#8217;s a utility called KernelEx that will let Firefox 3.0 run on older versions of Windows, but it makes my system not boot. <img src='http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Jensen</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/02/06/some-firefox-users-still-on-fx2/comment-page-1/#comment-121064</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=367#comment-121064</guid>
		<description>Simple.  I give FF3 an honest try every few months.  Give up and return to FF2

Annoyances:
-- Bookmark management
-- Frightening history
-- Bookmark management
-- Bookmark management</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple.  I give FF3 an honest try every few months.  Give up and return to FF2</p>
<p>Annoyances:<br />
&#8211; Bookmark management<br />
&#8211; Frightening history<br />
&#8211; Bookmark management<br />
&#8211; Bookmark management</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qtchic86</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/02/06/some-firefox-users-still-on-fx2/comment-page-1/#comment-111063</link>
		<dc:creator>qtchic86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 22:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=367#comment-111063</guid>
		<description>Well, let&#039;s not forget that many of these FF2 users are could be web designers, simply using the browser to test the site for other FF2 users. Many of the countries listed here happen to have a large population of IT professionals. Check it: http://www.chillibreeze.com/articles/top-countries-outsourcing.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, let&#8217;s not forget that many of these FF2 users are could be web designers, simply using the browser to test the site for other FF2 users. Many of the countries listed here happen to have a large population of IT professionals. Check it: <a href="http://www.chillibreeze.com/articles/top-countries-outsourcing.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.chillibreeze.com/articles/top-countries-outsourcing.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/02/06/some-firefox-users-still-on-fx2/comment-page-1/#comment-97679</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=367#comment-97679</guid>
		<description>It would be nice if Fx 3 worked faster in GNU/Linux environment.
http://www.tuxradar.com/content/benchmarked-firefox-javascript-linux-and-windows-and-its-not-pretty — situation with performance does not dispose to upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if Fx 3 worked faster in GNU/Linux environment.<br />
<a href="http://www.tuxradar.com/content/benchmarked-firefox-javascript-linux-and-windows-and-its-not-pretty" rel="nofollow">http://www.tuxradar.com/content/benchmarked-firefox-javascript-linux-and-windows-and-its-not-pretty</a> — situation with performance does not dispose to upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finite</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/02/06/some-firefox-users-still-on-fx2/comment-page-1/#comment-97601</link>
		<dc:creator>Finite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=367#comment-97601</guid>
		<description>I also noticed the lack of FF3 builds for SLED10, after I bought a computer with it preinstalled (I soon abandoned it for Ubuntu).

How many other OSes are able to run FF2 but not 3?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also noticed the lack of FF3 builds for SLED10, after I bought a computer with it preinstalled (I soon abandoned it for Ubuntu).</p>
<p>How many other OSes are able to run FF2 but not 3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FACORAT Fabrice</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/02/06/some-firefox-users-still-on-fx2/comment-page-1/#comment-88336</link>
		<dc:creator>FACORAT Fabrice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=367#comment-88336</guid>
		<description>I guess also that is theses countries, most people have access to Internet from cyber-coffee. If the manager of the internet coffee don&#039;t update Firefox, then the user end up using FF2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess also that is theses countries, most people have access to Internet from cyber-coffee. If the manager of the internet coffee don&#8217;t update Firefox, then the user end up using FF2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/02/06/some-firefox-users-still-on-fx2/comment-page-1/#comment-85734</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=367#comment-85734</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used some other people&#039;s computers that have Fx2 on them and started to upgrade to Fx3 but by the time I&#039;d finished using the machine the update hadn&#039;t finished downloading by a long way. Somehow working towards quicker downloads would help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used some other people&#8217;s computers that have Fx2 on them and started to upgrade to Fx3 but by the time I&#8217;d finished using the machine the update hadn&#8217;t finished downloading by a long way. Somehow working towards quicker downloads would help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/02/06/some-firefox-users-still-on-fx2/comment-page-1/#comment-85665</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=367#comment-85665</guid>
		<description>In the case of my Vista 64bit, as a normal user I never get a prompt and the Check for Updates is grayed out.  This is using FF3.  I have to run Firefox as an admin user, then I can update it.  Many wouldn&#039;t notice such a thing was happening.  So maybe user permissions is the big culprit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the case of my Vista 64bit, as a normal user I never get a prompt and the Check for Updates is grayed out.  This is using FF3.  I have to run Firefox as an admin user, then I can update it.  Many wouldn&#8217;t notice such a thing was happening.  So maybe user permissions is the big culprit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
