<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Improvements Coming to Firefox Web Sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/03/04/more-improvements-coming-to-firefox-web-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/03/04/more-improvements-coming-to-firefox-web-sites/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mano</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/03/04/more-improvements-coming-to-firefox-web-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-92349</link>
		<dc:creator>Mano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=454#comment-92349</guid>
		<description>On the Linux page there should not be a comparison with IE. Doesn&#039;t make any sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Linux page there should not be a comparison with IE. Doesn&#8217;t make any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toe</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/03/04/more-improvements-coming-to-firefox-web-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-92284</link>
		<dc:creator>Toe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=454#comment-92284</guid>
		<description>As a suggestion, I&#039;d consider replacing the words &quot;Using Internet Explorer&quot; with &quot;The Blue e&quot;.

Dan: As far as users are concerned, IE*6* is perfectly compatible with modern web technologies.  Sites aren&#039;t dropping support for it yet, so they have no reason to think they&#039;re using something obsolete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a suggestion, I&#8217;d consider replacing the words &#8220;Using Internet Explorer&#8221; with &#8220;The Blue e&#8221;.</p>
<p>Dan: As far as users are concerned, IE*6* is perfectly compatible with modern web technologies.  Sites aren&#8217;t dropping support for it yet, so they have no reason to think they&#8217;re using something obsolete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/03/04/more-improvements-coming-to-firefox-web-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-92094</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=454#comment-92094</guid>
		<description>A couple of points about the tick-list:

&quot;Compatible with modern Web pages and technologies&quot; - Can you really say that about IE7?

&quot;Active security features and the industry’s fastest response times&quot; - To be fair, I&#039;d call IE7&#039;s phishing detection an active security feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of points about the tick-list:</p>
<p>&#8220;Compatible with modern Web pages and technologies&#8221; &#8211; Can you really say that about IE7?</p>
<p>&#8220;Active security features and the industry’s fastest response times&#8221; &#8211; To be fair, I&#8217;d call IE7&#8217;s phishing detection an active security feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
