<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox is Green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/06/19/firefox-is-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/06/19/firefox-is-green/</link>
	<description>When in doubt, sample it out...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:52:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NomadDNA</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/06/19/firefox-is-green/comment-page-1/#comment-129423</link>
		<dc:creator>NomadDNA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=612#comment-129423</guid>
		<description>Did you run chi square tests to see if these findings are statistically significant?

Are there other variables that might explain this 1% increase? 

Is it possible that there was no *scientifically* significant explanation for this small increase in conversions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you run chi square tests to see if these findings are statistically significant?</p>
<p>Are there other variables that might explain this 1% increase? </p>
<p>Is it possible that there was no *scientifically* significant explanation for this small increase in conversions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/06/19/firefox-is-green/comment-page-1/#comment-128078</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=612#comment-128078</guid>
		<description>Sounds a little bit like the sort of thing invasive adverts on the web try to do. Gradually refining the design in order to make people click, irrespective of the content. Is this really the way Firefox wants to gain market share?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds a little bit like the sort of thing invasive adverts on the web try to do. Gradually refining the design in order to make people click, irrespective of the content. Is this really the way Firefox wants to gain market share?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retnuh66</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/06/19/firefox-is-green/comment-page-1/#comment-128064</link>
		<dc:creator>Retnuh66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=612#comment-128064</guid>
		<description>This might just be me being used to installing add-ons, but the green to me looks more like a button I can just press and it automatically does everything for me. Even though I know it doesn&#039;t, it just give me the impression of being much simpler and easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might just be me being used to installing add-ons, but the green to me looks more like a button I can just press and it automatically does everything for me. Even though I know it doesn&#8217;t, it just give me the impression of being much simpler and easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/06/19/firefox-is-green/comment-page-1/#comment-127637</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=612#comment-127637</guid>
		<description>Well,I believe all this tests shows that more people are looking at Firefox as an alternative browser :) The purple colour looks out of place. Yes, the green is inviting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well,I believe all this tests shows that more people are looking at Firefox as an alternative browser <img src='http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  The purple colour looks out of place. Yes, the green is inviting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/06/19/firefox-is-green/comment-page-1/#comment-126907</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=612#comment-126907</guid>
		<description>The green seemed to be the most inviting to me. Blue looked like an unstable and unreliable button. Purple was intimidating. Orange actually looked decent but it looked too much like the Firefox icon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The green seemed to be the most inviting to me. Blue looked like an unstable and unreliable button. Purple was intimidating. Orange actually looked decent but it looked too much like the Firefox icon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KatieK</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/06/19/firefox-is-green/comment-page-1/#comment-117144</link>
		<dc:creator>KatieK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=612#comment-117144</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised you tested the purple button - it looks so out of place.  I&#039;d love to see the results of a multivariate test including the button text, headline and testimonial - segmented by browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised you tested the purple button &#8211; it looks so out of place.  I&#8217;d love to see the results of a multivariate test including the button text, headline and testimonial &#8211; segmented by browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cultural Multivariat</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/06/19/firefox-is-green/comment-page-1/#comment-116804</link>
		<dc:creator>Cultural Multivariat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=612#comment-116804</guid>
		<description>Interesting finding especially that everyone seems to be advocating red buttons as all times winners. Any comments on that? Did you consider testing a red button?

Similarly to Alex, I would also be interested if there are geographical/cultural differences in colour preference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting finding especially that everyone seems to be advocating red buttons as all times winners. Any comments on that? Did you consider testing a red button?</p>
<p>Similarly to Alex, I would also be interested if there are geographical/cultural differences in colour preference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gervase Markham</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/06/19/firefox-is-green/comment-page-1/#comment-116620</link>
		<dc:creator>Gervase Markham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=612#comment-116620</guid>
		<description>I think this may be related to the fact that &quot;big and green&quot; is becoming the standard for download buttons. I don&#039;t know whether we drove this trend or rode it, but it&#039;s there. download.com uses green, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this may be related to the fact that &#8220;big and green&#8221; is becoming the standard for download buttons. I don&#8217;t know whether we drove this trend or rode it, but it&#8217;s there. download.com uses green, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndersH</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/06/19/firefox-is-green/comment-page-1/#comment-116454</link>
		<dc:creator>AndersH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=612#comment-116454</guid>
		<description>&gt; I believe that text is only served to IE6 users [...]

Using IE7 (and clearing the accept-languages header) I also get redirected to that page from getfirefox.com, but then again IE7 was released in 2006 ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IE7 ). Let&#039;s just hope the page is not served to IE8 users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; I believe that text is only served to IE6 users [...]</p>
<p>Using IE7 (and clearing the accept-languages header) I also get redirected to that page from getfirefox.com, but then again IE7 was released in 2006 ( <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IE7" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IE7</a> ). Let&#8217;s just hope the page is not served to IE8 users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/06/19/firefox-is-green/comment-page-1/#comment-116367</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=612#comment-116367</guid>
		<description>&gt;I believe that text is only served to IE6 users, although I could be wrong.
---------
I can confirm that.  Recently cleaned house, reformatting my PCs and reinstalling everything.  Firefox shows a different page to IE users (the one pictured above) and Chrome users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;I believe that text is only served to IE6 users, although I could be wrong.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
I can confirm that.  Recently cleaned house, reformatting my PCs and reinstalling everything.  Firefox shows a different page to IE users (the one pictured above) and Chrome users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
