<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.5 Launch &#8211; a Week in Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/07/07/firefox-35-launch-a-week-in-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/07/07/firefox-35-launch-a-week-in-review/</link>
	<description>When in doubt, sample it out...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:52:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Henrik Skupin</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/07/07/firefox-35-launch-a-week-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-123214</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Skupin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=654#comment-123214</guid>
		<description>So we have a lower number of Firefox 3.5 downloads when comparing to 3.0? I don&#039;t think so because mostly all existent Firefox users have used the automated update to get the new version. We haven&#039;t offered this way when Firefox 3.0 has been released. So I wonder how many major updates happened that week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we have a lower number of Firefox 3.5 downloads when comparing to 3.0? I don&#8217;t think so because mostly all existent Firefox users have used the automated update to get the new version. We haven&#8217;t offered this way when Firefox 3.0 has been released. So I wonder how many major updates happened that week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
