<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Changes Coming to the Firefox Installer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/08/03/more-changes-coming-to-the-firefox-installer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/08/03/more-changes-coming-to-the-firefox-installer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:12:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snow White</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/08/03/more-changes-coming-to-the-firefox-installer/comment-page-1/#comment-137019</link>
		<dc:creator>Snow White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=880#comment-137019</guid>
		<description>what is the difference between using the tickbox when installing and when it asks you?? does the installer make it the default for everyone??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the difference between using the tickbox when installing and when it asks you?? does the installer make it the default for everyone??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/08/03/more-changes-coming-to-the-firefox-installer/comment-page-1/#comment-137018</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=880#comment-137018</guid>
		<description>I agree with Dan (18). Seeing as Firefox asks you on the first launch whether to make it the default browser or not isn&#039;t this checkbox redundant anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Dan (18). Seeing as Firefox asks you on the first launch whether to make it the default browser or not isn&#8217;t this checkbox redundant anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornelius</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/08/03/more-changes-coming-to-the-firefox-installer/comment-page-1/#comment-131208</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=880#comment-131208</guid>
		<description>Why not review the whole reasoning w/ Beltzner for hiding the &quot;make default&quot; checkbox as far out of the user&#039;s perception as possible?  The checkbox was only added to FF3&#039;s setup in the RC1 build, indicating that it was specifically moved so that people trying Firefox wouldn&#039;t notice FF3 was about to become the default browser.  The fact that Firefox was the 1st browser to put this &quot;default browser&quot; option in Setup amongst all major browsers (including IE, Chrome, Opera, and Safari) clearly suggests deception is not beneath Mozilla to gain browser share &quot;by hook or by crook&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not review the whole reasoning w/ Beltzner for hiding the &#8220;make default&#8221; checkbox as far out of the user&#8217;s perception as possible?  The checkbox was only added to FF3&#8242;s setup in the RC1 build, indicating that it was specifically moved so that people trying Firefox wouldn&#8217;t notice FF3 was about to become the default browser.  The fact that Firefox was the 1st browser to put this &#8220;default browser&#8221; option in Setup amongst all major browsers (including IE, Chrome, Opera, and Safari) clearly suggests deception is not beneath Mozilla to gain browser share &#8220;by hook or by crook&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/08/03/more-changes-coming-to-the-firefox-installer/comment-page-1/#comment-131004</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=880#comment-131004</guid>
		<description>Get rid of the checkbox. Firefox asks on startup anyway, ignoring your choice in the installer if your choice was &quot;no&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get rid of the checkbox. Firefox asks on startup anyway, ignoring your choice in the installer if your choice was &#8220;no&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/08/03/more-changes-coming-to-the-firefox-installer/comment-page-1/#comment-129816</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=880#comment-129816</guid>
		<description>Instead of a checkbox, which is modal, the ‘Install’ button could be split into two: ‘Install and set default browser’ and ‘Install’, with the former selected by default. When Firefox is already the default, the former would not appear. Also, the “wizard” installer should have the number of steps severely reduced already to two—or even one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of a checkbox, which is modal, the ‘Install’ button could be split into two: ‘Install and set default browser’ and ‘Install’, with the former selected by default. When Firefox is already the default, the former would not appear. Also, the “wizard” installer should have the number of steps severely reduced already to two—or even one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/08/03/more-changes-coming-to-the-firefox-installer/comment-page-1/#comment-129757</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=880#comment-129757</guid>
		<description>Move it to the summary page, unchecked by default. Users can eventually set it as a default when they see the dialog.

Good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Move it to the summary page, unchecked by default. Users can eventually set it as a default when they see the dialog.</p>
<p>Good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/08/03/more-changes-coming-to-the-firefox-installer/comment-page-1/#comment-129579</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 03:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=880#comment-129579</guid>
		<description>&quot;Click the Back button to change this.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Click the Back button to change this.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomy paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/08/03/more-changes-coming-to-the-firefox-installer/comment-page-1/#comment-129450</link>
		<dc:creator>tomy paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=880#comment-129450</guid>
		<description>such a minor problem cant believe they could notice this, cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>such a minor problem cant believe they could notice this, cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NTP</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/08/03/more-changes-coming-to-the-firefox-installer/comment-page-1/#comment-129447</link>
		<dc:creator>NTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=880#comment-129447</guid>
		<description>Are no one even noticing that there&#039;s an abundance of empty space wasted on the &quot;summary&quot; page?

&quot;Firefox should ask the first time it is run if it isn’t already the default&quot;

This is already happening, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are no one even noticing that there&#8217;s an abundance of empty space wasted on the &#8220;summary&#8221; page?</p>
<p>&#8220;Firefox should ask the first time it is run if it isn’t already the default&#8221;</p>
<p>This is already happening, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachel</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2009/08/03/more-changes-coming-to-the-firefox-installer/comment-page-1/#comment-129412</link>
		<dc:creator>rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/?p=880#comment-129412</guid>
		<description>i had this problem i missed the checkbox once, quite frustrating to find it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i had this problem i missed the checkbox once, quite frustrating to find it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

