<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Blog of Metrics</title>
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics</link>
	<description>When in doubt, sample it out...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another Win for Firefox Users by Frank T</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/11/another-win-for-firefox-users/#comment-19992</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/11/another-win-for-firefox-users/#comment-19992</guid>
		<description>I'm glad that Google did this.  However, I think it's pretty naive to claim they are doing this "because it's the right thing to do".  It's more likely that, in this case, the interests of shareholders and users coincide.

Why would shareholders care about fraudulent URLs?  Because it's fraud!  I'm not a lawyer, but I suspect that this move was suggested by one.  Getting taken to court for fraud is not good for the bottom line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that Google did this.  However, I think it&#8217;s pretty naive to claim they are doing this &#8220;because it&#8217;s the right thing to do&#8221;.  It&#8217;s more likely that, in this case, the interests of shareholders and users coincide.</p>
<p>Why would shareholders care about fraudulent URLs?  Because it&#8217;s fraud!  I&#8217;m not a lawyer, but I suspect that this move was suggested by one.  Getting taken to court for fraud is not good for the bottom line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox Worldwide Market Share - was there a change? by Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/05/05/firefox-worldwide-market-share-was-there-a-change/#comment-19196</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/05/05/firefox-worldwide-market-share-was-there-a-change/#comment-19196</guid>
		<description>1.) IE8 Beta 1 was released, which means developers started hitting every site they owned, and could find to test out this new browser, to find bugs etc.
This also means they were not using their normal, favorite browser (Firefox/Safari/Opera)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.) IE8 Beta 1 was released, which means developers started hitting every site they owned, and could find to test out this new browser, to find bugs etc.<br />
This also means they were not using their normal, favorite browser (Firefox/Safari/Opera)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Early Rise of Firefox 3 Adoption by pd</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/22/the-early-rise-of-firefox-3-adoption/#comment-16123</link>
		<dc:creator>pd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/22/the-early-rise-of-firefox-3-adoption/#comment-16123</guid>
		<description>one way to look at it is that Firefox 2 performance e was so crappy, those who are passionate enough to still hate the opposition will be inclined to give Fx3 a go. Luckily it seems to finally improve perf to a satisfactory level. Otherwise your beta levels for Fx3 might have seen a big downturn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one way to look at it is that Firefox 2 performance e was so crappy, those who are passionate enough to still hate the opposition will be inclined to give Fx3 a go. Luckily it seems to finally improve perf to a satisfactory level. Otherwise your beta levels for Fx3 might have seen a big downturn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Early Rise of Firefox 3 Adoption by Bob the Milkman</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/22/the-early-rise-of-firefox-3-adoption/#comment-16084</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob the Milkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/22/the-early-rise-of-firefox-3-adoption/#comment-16084</guid>
		<description>I like lots of features of firefox 3, and I use it, but it is a good thing it's still a beta - I have been getting crashes and such with b5.  Unfortunately, many extension developers have not been keeping up with the frequent updating of the program :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like lots of features of firefox 3, and I use it, but it is a good thing it&#8217;s still a beta - I have been getting crashes and such with b5.  Unfortunately, many extension developers have not been keeping up with the frequent updating of the program <img src='http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Early Rise of Firefox 3 Adoption by boemer</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/22/the-early-rise-of-firefox-3-adoption/#comment-16010</link>
		<dc:creator>boemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/22/the-early-rise-of-firefox-3-adoption/#comment-16010</guid>
		<description>I think Firefox 1.5 was okay, Firefox 2.0 was not really an improvement. (For example the setInterval/setTimeout was a complete catastroph. 

Firefox 3.0 is faster, looks great on a mac, and just rocks...

The only problem it is still a beta....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Firefox 1.5 was okay, Firefox 2.0 was not really an improvement. (For example the setInterval/setTimeout was a complete catastroph. </p>
<p>Firefox 3.0 is faster, looks great on a mac, and just rocks&#8230;</p>
<p>The only problem it is still a beta&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introducing Spectator by Donnie Berkholz</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/03/17/introducing-spectator/#comment-14145</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Berkholz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 04:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/03/17/introducing-spectator/#comment-14145</guid>
		<description>I'd love to try this, but it doesn't want to install on 3.0_beta5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to try this, but it doesn&#8217;t want to install on 3.0_beta5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another Win for Firefox Users by kkovash</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/11/another-win-for-firefox-users/#comment-13997</link>
		<dc:creator>kkovash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/11/another-win-for-firefox-users/#comment-13997</guid>
		<description>Jesse: good question.  The new policy applies to all *new* ads.  So, if another advertiser has previously been using something like mozilla.com as their display URL, they can continue to do so.  We are currently going through the trademark process with AdWords to resolve further issues such as this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse: good question.  The new policy applies to all *new* ads.  So, if another advertiser has previously been using something like mozilla.com as their display URL, they can continue to do so.  We are currently going through the trademark process with AdWords to resolve further issues such as this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another Win for Firefox Users by Amsterdammer</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/11/another-win-for-firefox-users/#comment-13440</link>
		<dc:creator>Amsterdammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/11/another-win-for-firefox-users/#comment-13440</guid>
		<description>Try different national Google searchplugins from http://mycroft.mozdev.org/, and u will get still ads (for instance Dutch Google searchplugin).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try different national Google searchplugins from <a href="http://mycroft.mozdev.org/," rel="nofollow">http://mycroft.mozdev.org/,</a> and u will get still ads (for instance Dutch Google searchplugin).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another Win for Firefox Users by Justin Wood (Callek)</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/11/another-win-for-firefox-users/#comment-13408</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Wood (Callek)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 05:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/11/another-win-for-firefox-users/#comment-13408</guid>
		<description>"It’s always enlightening to see a company put the interest of users ahead of the interest of shareholders."

I agree with the whole of your post, but assuming google is publically traded (I think it is), don't they have a *legal* obligation to put the interests of their shareholders first?

Though I would hate to see them go back on this move here, perhaps they do see it as beneficial to their shareholders (more people might use adsense on their sites if the integrity of the ads is better too).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s always enlightening to see a company put the interest of users ahead of the interest of shareholders.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with the whole of your post, but assuming google is publically traded (I think it is), don&#8217;t they have a *legal* obligation to put the interests of their shareholders first?</p>
<p>Though I would hate to see them go back on this move here, perhaps they do see it as beneficial to their shareholders (more people might use adsense on their sites if the integrity of the ads is better too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another Win for Firefox Users by Jesse Ruderman</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/11/another-win-for-firefox-users/#comment-13399</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Ruderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2008/04/11/another-win-for-firefox-users/#comment-13399</guid>
		<description>I just searched Google for "firefox" and got an ad going to www.spread-firefox3.com but labeled as going to mozilla.com.  Is this policy not yet being enforced properly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just searched Google for &#8220;firefox&#8221; and got an ad going to <a href="http://www.spread-firefox3.com" rel="nofollow">www.spread-firefox3.com</a> but labeled as going to mozilla.com.  Is this policy not yet being enforced properly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
