<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to build a better (SSL proxy) mouse trap (with lighttpd)?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/mrz/2007/05/25/how-to-build-a-better-ssl-proxy-mouse-trap-with-lighttpd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/mrz/2007/05/25/how-to-build-a-better-ssl-proxy-mouse-trap-with-lighttpd/</link>
	<description>noise from a mozilla IT/Operations wrangler</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:41:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: arunkamatH</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/mrz/2007/05/25/how-to-build-a-better-ssl-proxy-mouse-trap-with-lighttpd/comment-page-1/#comment-21698</link>
		<dc:creator>arunkamatH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/mrz/2007/05/25/how-to-build-a-better-ssl-proxy-mouse-trap-with-lighttpd/#comment-21698</guid>
		<description>Interesting setup.  I am interested in providing access to internal Citrix servers to external (i.e, Internet) users via a reverse proxy in the DMZ (considering Blue Coat)that will support SSL termination with hardware accelerator.  The traffic from the reverse proxy to the Citrix server will be through a network load balancer (NetScaler or other, such as F5 or Coyote Point).  I am wondering whether you have tried this config out and what I should watch out for.  The objective is to have only Port 443 open on the external firewall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting setup.  I am interested in providing access to internal Citrix servers to external (i.e, Internet) users via a reverse proxy in the DMZ (considering Blue Coat)that will support SSL termination with hardware accelerator.  The traffic from the reverse proxy to the Citrix server will be through a network load balancer (NetScaler or other, such as F5 or Coyote Point).  I am wondering whether you have tried this config out and what I should watch out for.  The objective is to have only Port 443 open on the external firewall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/mrz/2007/05/25/how-to-build-a-better-ssl-proxy-mouse-trap-with-lighttpd/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 18:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/mrz/2007/05/25/how-to-build-a-better-ssl-proxy-mouse-trap-with-lighttpd/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Nginx has started to become popular in the Ruby community lately, thanks to Ezra:

http://brainspl.at/articles/2006/08/23/nginx-my-new-favorite-front-end-for-mongrel-cluster

~L</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nginx has started to become popular in the Ruby community lately, thanks to Ezra:</p>
<p><a href="http://brainspl.at/articles/2006/08/23/nginx-my-new-favorite-front-end-for-mongrel-cluster" rel="nofollow">http://brainspl.at/articles/2006/08/23/nginx-my-new-favorite-front-end-for-mongrel-cluster</a></p>
<p>~L</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frédéric Wenzel</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/mrz/2007/05/25/how-to-build-a-better-ssl-proxy-mouse-trap-with-lighttpd/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Wenzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 11:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/mrz/2007/05/25/how-to-build-a-better-ssl-proxy-mouse-trap-with-lighttpd/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I like the idea. Interesting to see that the netscaler&#039;s SSL capability is weaker than regular HTTP servers.

I haven&#039;t heard of nginx either, but if the information on the web page is right, it&#039;s used pretty successfully further east on this continent. If you have the possibility, you might consider running a load test on lighty vs. nginx to see who does the better job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea. Interesting to see that the netscaler&#8217;s SSL capability is weaker than regular HTTP servers.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t heard of nginx either, but if the information on the web page is right, it&#8217;s used pretty successfully further east on this continent. If you have the possibility, you might consider running a load test on lighty vs. nginx to see who does the better job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrz</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/mrz/2007/05/25/how-to-build-a-better-ssl-proxy-mouse-trap-with-lighttpd/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>mrz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 17:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/mrz/2007/05/25/how-to-build-a-better-ssl-proxy-mouse-trap-with-lighttpd/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Yusuf - yeah, I&#039;ve using what&#039;s current out of svn.

Nginx, never heard of that - I&#039;ll take a look!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yusuf &#8211; yeah, I&#8217;ve using what&#8217;s current out of svn.</p>
<p>Nginx, never heard of that &#8211; I&#8217;ll take a look!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/mrz/2007/05/25/how-to-build-a-better-ssl-proxy-mouse-trap-with-lighttpd/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 16:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/mrz/2007/05/25/how-to-build-a-better-ssl-proxy-mouse-trap-with-lighttpd/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>What do you think of Nginx?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think of Nginx?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yusuf Goolamabbas</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/mrz/2007/05/25/how-to-build-a-better-ssl-proxy-mouse-trap-with-lighttpd/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Yusuf Goolamabbas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 15:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/mrz/2007/05/25/how-to-build-a-better-ssl-proxy-mouse-trap-with-lighttpd/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>lighty as a reverse proxy is only starting to be stable in 1.5-svn. if you need a reverse proxy which can do ssl + compression today, then you should look at nginx 

Let me know if you need a config (proxy+gzip+ssl) to help you get bootstrapped. Email me

Also, for software SSL, The Opteron or the Sun Niagara T2000 screams</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lighty as a reverse proxy is only starting to be stable in 1.5-svn. if you need a reverse proxy which can do ssl + compression today, then you should look at nginx </p>
<p>Let me know if you need a config (proxy+gzip+ssl) to help you get bootstrapped. Email me</p>
<p>Also, for software SSL, The Opteron or the Sun Niagara T2000 screams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

