In my last post I talked about a 2mW user. Specifically I said:
5. Or, with roughly 250 million Firefox users, 50kW is 2 milliwatts/user (or 144Wh/month).
I haven’t stopped thinking about that number as a metric of measuring efficiency or how much power it takes to do work (provide services) for some number of Firefox users. I thought it’d be more interesting to trend wattage/user over time than just raw wattage (which is still too abstract for me to wrestle with).
My only problem is that my graphing tool kept spitting about numbers like:
241.24 μW
I had to stare at it bit before it clicked.
50kW/250m users = .0002 watts/user
50,000 W/250,000,000 users = .0002 watts/user
That comes out to .2mW/user (or 200μW/user). Quite frankly I’m embarrassed I didn’t catch my mistake earlier. I should have used something like this or this before posting!
_____________________
The milliwatt (symbol:mW) is equal to one thousandth (10-3) of a watt. The microwatt (symbol:μW) is equal to one millionth (10-6) of a watt.

Comments (4)
The post you link to has been corrected to 2 micro Watt rather than 200 micro Watt.
Yep, fixed that this morning too.
I’d say you had a Verizon Moment there.
I like the post’s title. Nice way making errata. I wonder if it could help to save Enron.