<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Valgrind on Windows?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/2009/05/29/valgrind-on-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/2009/05/29/valgrind-on-windows/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:54:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric B.</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/2009/05/29/valgrind-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/?p=117#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Windows users also currently have the option of running Microsoft&#039;s free Application Verifier:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=c4a25ab9-649d-4a1b-b4a7-c9d8b095df18

that&#039;s just as easy to use as Valgrind and provides a lot of the basic memcheck features.  And Microsoft is actively updating App Verifier.  So while Valgrind on Windows would be cool, I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;ll ever really be worth the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows users also currently have the option of running Microsoft&#8217;s free Application Verifier:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=c4a25ab9-649d-4a1b-b4a7-c9d8b095df18" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=c4a25ab9-649d-4a1b-b4a7-c9d8b095df18</a></p>
<p>that&#8217;s just as easy to use as Valgrind and provides a lot of the basic memcheck features.  And Microsoft is actively updating App Verifier.  So while Valgrind on Windows would be cool, I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;ll ever really be worth the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mediocrebeing</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/2009/05/29/valgrind-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Mediocrebeing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 19:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/?p=117#comment-168</guid>
		<description>While Windows is much much more widely-used, only a tiny fraction of Windows users are developers and a small fraction of developers write C programs. In comparison, a good fraction of Linux users are C developers for whom valgrind is designed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Windows is much much more widely-used, only a tiny fraction of Windows users are developers and a small fraction of developers write C programs. In comparison, a good fraction of Linux users are C developers for whom valgrind is designed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne B</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/2009/05/29/valgrind-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/?p=117#comment-165</guid>
		<description>&quot;it’s worth addressing a* much, much more* widely-used platform:  Windows&quot;

- Fixed that for ya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it’s worth addressing a* much, much more* widely-used platform:  Windows&#8221;</p>
<p>- Fixed that for ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hughes</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/2009/05/29/valgrind-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 07:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/?p=117#comment-162</guid>
		<description>There are still some significant problems running things under wine with valgrind, at least on some linux distributions.

I believe Ubuntu may work better but certainly on Fedora there are still problems relating to address space issues and where things get placed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are still some significant problems running things under wine with valgrind, at least on some linux distributions.</p>
<p>I believe Ubuntu may work better but certainly on Fedora there are still problems relating to address space issues and where things get placed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

