<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Valgrind + Mac OS X update (June 17, 2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/2009/06/17/valgrind-mac-os-x-update-june-17-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/2009/06/17/valgrind-mac-os-x-update-june-17-2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:54:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/2009/06/17/valgrind-mac-os-x-update-june-17-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/?p=124#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Sean:

- PowerPC doesn&#039;t work, and never will.
- Signals mostly work;  should be ok as long as you aren&#039;t doing anything too strange.
- System call coverage is gradually improving.
- Obj-C GC is unchanged.
- --db-attach=yes won&#039;t work.
- Tools other than Memcheck: they all work except for Helgrind and DRD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean:</p>
<p>- PowerPC doesn&#8217;t work, and never will.<br />
- Signals mostly work;  should be ok as long as you aren&#8217;t doing anything too strange.<br />
- System call coverage is gradually improving.<br />
- Obj-C GC is unchanged.<br />
- &#8211;db-attach=yes won&#8217;t work.<br />
- Tools other than Memcheck: they all work except for Helgrind and DRD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/2009/06/17/valgrind-mac-os-x-update-june-17-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/?p=124#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Nicholas, thanks for the quick reply.  I&#039;ll give it a try.  Is Greg&#039;s list of stuff that does not work still current?  He lists:

- PowerPC code
- Signals
- Many system calls
- Objective-C garbage collection
- --db-attach=yes
- Tools other than memcheck

And what about 64 bit apps?  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas, thanks for the quick reply.  I&#8217;ll give it a try.  Is Greg&#8217;s list of stuff that does not work still current?  He lists:</p>
<p>- PowerPC code<br />
- Signals<br />
- Many system calls<br />
- Objective-C garbage collection<br />
- &#8211;db-attach=yes<br />
- Tools other than memcheck</p>
<p>And what about 64 bit apps?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Nethercote</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/2009/06/17/valgrind-mac-os-x-update-june-17-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Nethercote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/?p=124#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Sean, probably not, although I haven&#039;t tried.  Greg Parker listed that as a limitation of the original patch and I&#039;m not aware of any changes that would have affected that.  You could try it yourself and see how it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, probably not, although I haven&#8217;t tried.  Greg Parker listed that as a limitation of the original patch and I&#8217;m not aware of any changes that would have affected that.  You could try it yourself and see how it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/2009/06/17/valgrind-mac-os-x-update-june-17-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/?p=124#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Does valgrind work with the Objective-C Garbage Collected apps yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does valgrind work with the Objective-C Garbage Collected apps yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: astrange</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/2009/06/17/valgrind-mac-os-x-update-june-17-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>astrange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/?p=124#comment-190</guid>
		<description>APE (which not many people are running on Leopard) will also break valgrind if you run it - the injection into the process actually seems to work (at least for a little while), but it tries to read thread-local data which doesn&#039;t work. I don&#039;t really think that&#039;s a valgrind bug, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>APE (which not many people are running on Leopard) will also break valgrind if you run it &#8211; the injection into the process actually seems to work (at least for a little while), but it tries to read thread-local data which doesn&#8217;t work. I don&#8217;t really think that&#8217;s a valgrind bug, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

