<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 Can Render Technology Correctly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/</link>
	<description>This Must Be the Place (Naive Melody)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:17:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: axel</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/comment-page-1/#comment-8112</link>
		<dc:creator>axel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/#comment-8112</guid>
		<description>Is there any possiblity to turn off kerning from the webpage?

I have a webpage where I defenitely not want it to be kerned (or alternatively have two letters still be kerned when I split them with a span)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any possiblity to turn off kerning from the webpage?</p>
<p>I have a webpage where I defenitely not want it to be kerned (or alternatively have two letters still be kerned when I split them with a span)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 3 looking better and better at Johan&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/comment-page-1/#comment-8037</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 3 looking better and better at Johan&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/#comment-8037</guid>
		<description>[...] The above quote is taken from: http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The above quote is taken from: <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PENIX</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/comment-page-1/#comment-4391</link>
		<dc:creator>PENIX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/#comment-4391</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve become so used to the way it looks with the gap that it looks funny without it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve become so used to the way it looks with the gap that it looks funny without it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Sayre</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/comment-page-1/#comment-4389</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Sayre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/#comment-4389</guid>
		<description>Hi Bob,

I&#039;m discussing Firefox 3, which has had several radical Mac changes vs Firefox 2. Complaints are always accepted , but please don&#039;t assume we&#039;re adding yet another thing to an otherwise unchanged program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m discussing Firefox 3, which has had several radical Mac changes vs Firefox 2. Complaints are always accepted , but please don&#8217;t assume we&#8217;re adding yet another thing to an otherwise unchanged program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Papper</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/comment-page-1/#comment-4388</link>
		<dc:creator>Papper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/#comment-4388</guid>
		<description>The kerning is no doubt worth it, anything that makes text more readable is a good thing (as long as you can turn it off on slower machines).

This is one of the few times I think we can indulge ourselves thanks to the power of modern computers :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kerning is no doubt worth it, anything that makes text more readable is a good thing (as long as you can turn it off on slower machines).</p>
<p>This is one of the few times I think we can indulge ourselves thanks to the power of modern computers <img src='http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Aman</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/comment-page-1/#comment-4381</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Aman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2007/10/27/firefox-3-can-render-technology-correctly/#comment-4381</guid>
		<description>Another performance hit for Firefox?  Great.  I recently switch to Camino and gave up my beloved extensions because I couldn&#039;t deal with the unbelievably bad performance of Firefox on my Mac.  Camino is now happily rendering pages roughly 5x faster than Firefox was.

I really don&#039;t know why Firefox is so much faster on Windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another performance hit for Firefox?  Great.  I recently switch to Camino and gave up my beloved extensions because I couldn&#8217;t deal with the unbelievably bad performance of Firefox on my Mac.  Camino is now happily rendering pages roughly 5x faster than Firefox was.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t know why Firefox is so much faster on Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
