<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The story behind Firefox 3: Places</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2007/11/01/the-story-behind-firefox-3-places/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2007/11/01/the-story-behind-firefox-3-places/</link>
	<description>Schrep&#039;s random mumblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:23:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2007/11/01/the-story-behind-firefox-3-places/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2007/11/01/the-story-behind-firefox-3-places/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Having not tried any FF3 builds, does it still support the current way of doing bookmarks - in particular, being able to group them and open an entire group in one operation? Not having that (or equivalent functionality) would be a major regression for me...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having not tried any FF3 builds, does it still support the current way of doing bookmarks &#8211; in particular, being able to group them and open an entire group in one operation? Not having that (or equivalent functionality) would be a major regression for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Accettura</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2007/11/01/the-story-behind-firefox-3-places/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Accettura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 01:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2007/11/01/the-story-behind-firefox-3-places/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been begging for a bookmark overhaul for a long time (a few years).  Every person I&#039;ve shown places to seems to love the concept.  I think it&#039;s got great potential to bring bookmarking back to the web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been begging for a bookmark overhaul for a long time (a few years).  Every person I&#8217;ve shown places to seems to love the concept.  I think it&#8217;s got great potential to bring bookmarking back to the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skierpage</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2007/11/01/the-story-behind-firefox-3-places/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>skierpage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 03:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2007/11/01/the-story-behind-firefox-3-places/#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Sqlite passes ACID and Gecko 1.9 passes Acid2, that&#039;s like acid on acid, man!  Far-out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sqlite passes ACID and Gecko 1.9 passes Acid2, that&#8217;s like acid on acid, man!  Far-out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2007/11/01/the-story-behind-firefox-3-places/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2007/11/01/the-story-behind-firefox-3-places/#comment-183</guid>
		<description>I am getting more and more excited about 3.0. FF is definitely headed in the right direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am getting more and more excited about 3.0. FF is definitely headed in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
