<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What can you do when your browser is 7 times faster?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2008/08/22/what-can-you-do-when-your-browser-is-7-times-faster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2008/08/22/what-can-you-do-when-your-browser-is-7-times-faster/</link>
	<description>Schrep&#039;s random mumblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:23:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Somnath Banerjee</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2008/08/22/what-can-you-do-when-your-browser-is-7-times-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Somnath Banerjee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/?p=100#comment-453</guid>
		<description>I could not run this demo on Chrome.
That is somewhat understandable.

But I could not even run it on IE7.
Ami i doing anything wrong?
I tried the following url:
http://people.mozilla.com/~schrep/image12.html

Best Regards, Somnath</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not run this demo on Chrome.<br />
That is somewhat understandable.</p>
<p>But I could not even run it on IE7.<br />
Ami i doing anything wrong?<br />
I tried the following url:<br />
<a href="http://people.mozilla.com/~schrep/image12.html" rel="nofollow">http://people.mozilla.com/~schrep/image12.html</a></p>
<p>Best Regards, Somnath</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2008/08/22/what-can-you-do-when-your-browser-is-7-times-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/?p=100#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Although stated that your (great, fascinating) demo works with webkit, it doesn&#039;t work with google&#039;s new chrome browser? (Yes, of course it is new ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although stated that your (great, fascinating) demo works with webkit, it doesn&#8217;t work with google&#8217;s new chrome browser? (Yes, of course it is new <img src='http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paercebal</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2008/08/22/what-can-you-do-when-your-browser-is-7-times-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Paercebal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/?p=100#comment-416</guid>
		<description>Amazing.
And congratulations to all the peoples involved.

I agree with Al: I have DSL, but still, viewing the movie was painful. I am right now downloading the full 33mb SWF file hoping it will be enough to see it on the browser.

As for Joseph, this improvement won&#039;t probably decrease nor increase the current security of your browser. It will only make it faster. So, don&#039;t get paranoid. Or next week, you&#039;ll come here claiming to touch your keyboard only with gloves (&quot;because, you know, the aliens...&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing.<br />
And congratulations to all the peoples involved.</p>
<p>I agree with Al: I have DSL, but still, viewing the movie was painful. I am right now downloading the full 33mb SWF file hoping it will be enough to see it on the browser.</p>
<p>As for Joseph, this improvement won&#8217;t probably decrease nor increase the current security of your browser. It will only make it faster. So, don&#8217;t get paranoid. Or next week, you&#8217;ll come here claiming to touch your keyboard only with gloves (&#8221;because, you know, the aliens&#8230;&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2008/08/22/what-can-you-do-when-your-browser-is-7-times-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/?p=100#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Well, this poor chap has to wait an eon anyway as my downloads rarely exceed 5k/sec being on a  dialup modem, yes there are places that still have no better than a basic copper telephone wire to connect to the internet, so I clicked on the image, after all it said it would run the demo in 1 minute, so I waited 3 minutes, but it still didn&#039;t happen?? maybe someone will put the pictures into words, or a series of screenshots to explain the improvements??? it would certainly be appreciated :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this poor chap has to wait an eon anyway as my downloads rarely exceed 5k/sec being on a  dialup modem, yes there are places that still have no better than a basic copper telephone wire to connect to the internet, so I clicked on the image, after all it said it would run the demo in 1 minute, so I waited 3 minutes, but it still didn&#8217;t happen?? maybe someone will put the pictures into words, or a series of screenshots to explain the improvements??? it would certainly be appreciated <img src='http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: my</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2008/08/22/what-can-you-do-when-your-browser-is-7-times-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>my</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/?p=100#comment-380</guid>
		<description>Just a 4 times faster here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a 4 times faster here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skierpage</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2008/08/22/what-can-you-do-when-your-browser-is-7-times-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>skierpage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 02:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/?p=100#comment-379</guid>
		<description>Fabulous.  Mozilla site should have a page for &quot;next-generation web awesomeness examples&quot; like CSS3, interactive SVG, and processing.js, with a sub-page for &quot;even more awesomeness coming with Firefox 3.1&quot;.  I try to tell people how great the HTML5 features in Safari and Firefox are and then have to search blogs to find examples.

It&#039;s funny that you made a .swf to publicize this work.  Maybe you can get Jing to create screencasts using the  tag with fallback to swf for lesser browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fabulous.  Mozilla site should have a page for &#8220;next-generation web awesomeness examples&#8221; like CSS3, interactive SVG, and processing.js, with a sub-page for &#8220;even more awesomeness coming with Firefox 3.1&#8243;.  I try to tell people how great the HTML5 features in Safari and Firefox are and then have to search blogs to find examples.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny that you made a .swf to publicize this work.  Maybe you can get Jing to create screencasts using the  tag with fallback to swf for lesser browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2008/08/22/what-can-you-do-when-your-browser-is-7-times-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/?p=100#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Another comment specially for dubed. Remember that Silverlight 1.1 basically is a JS driven canvas. ORLY? yes.. really. Tho we will all love the CLR based version of Silverlight, the majority of the currently Silverlight deployed websites running in Mozilla will benefit from these improvements.

And since Adobe&#039;s &#039;involvement&#039; we can only expect that they might at least do &#039;something&#039; with the new found JS glory in Mozilla.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another comment specially for dubed. Remember that Silverlight 1.1 basically is a JS driven canvas. ORLY? yes.. really. Tho we will all love the CLR based version of Silverlight, the majority of the currently Silverlight deployed websites running in Mozilla will benefit from these improvements.</p>
<p>And since Adobe&#8217;s &#8216;involvement&#8217; we can only expect that they might at least do &#8217;something&#8217; with the new found JS glory in Mozilla.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2008/08/22/what-can-you-do-when-your-browser-is-7-times-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/?p=100#comment-375</guid>
		<description>Joseph, maybe you should like reconfigure this amazing system of superb stacked firewalls you use to like filter out software in general. Both local and remote.

In other news, kudos to the Mozilla team for this huge improvements in this difficult domain. Without doubt this will help to feature enrich the already rich Internet applications. I can only hope that the WebKit team will learn and catch-up in regards to their JS performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph, maybe you should like reconfigure this amazing system of superb stacked firewalls you use to like filter out software in general. Both local and remote.</p>
<p>In other news, kudos to the Mozilla team for this huge improvements in this difficult domain. Without doubt this will help to feature enrich the already rich Internet applications. I can only hope that the WebKit team will learn and catch-up in regards to their JS performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klaus</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2008/08/22/what-can-you-do-when-your-browser-is-7-times-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>klaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/?p=100#comment-371</guid>
		<description>Joseph, JavaScript runs in a sandbox, very similar to the Java applet sandbox. And &quot;three levels of firewall software&quot;, now you&#039;re being ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph, JavaScript runs in a sandbox, very similar to the Java applet sandbox. And &#8220;three levels of firewall software&#8221;, now you&#8217;re being ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klaus</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/2008/08/22/what-can-you-do-when-your-browser-is-7-times-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>klaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/schrep/?p=100#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Looks like it doesn&#039;t yet work in the latest x86_64 nightly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like it doesn&#8217;t yet work in the latest x86_64 nightly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
