<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Related Security Issue in URL Protocol Handling on Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:36:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Day Spring Center</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-102252</link>
		<dc:creator>Day Spring Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/#comment-102252</guid>
		<description>I think this is a good blog &amp; this information is very helpful &amp; My site Christian counseling is about counseling in Dallas, Palno, Richardson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a good blog &amp; this information is very helpful &amp; My site Christian counseling is about counseling in Dallas, Palno, Richardson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-75612</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/#comment-75612</guid>
		<description>I use IE on my personal computer but Firefox is common on the PCs at the internet cafes here in Prague. Many hotels also use Firefox as the browser of choice on their computers reserved for guests. 

It&#039;s my estimation that a problem occurring on both browsers on Microsoft should be fixed before we all chuck it and switch to those cool Apples that have just come out. Yeah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use IE on my personal computer but Firefox is common on the PCs at the internet cafes here in Prague. Many hotels also use Firefox as the browser of choice on their computers reserved for guests. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s my estimation that a problem occurring on both browsers on Microsoft should be fixed before we all chuck it and switch to those cool Apples that have just come out. Yeah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleocin</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-15366</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleocin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/#comment-15366</guid>
		<description>been hypocritical not to fix the similar issue in Firefox. The Mozilla Security Blog post about the URL protocol handling flaw states that “defense in depth is the best way to protect people” (although that weblog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>been hypocritical not to fix the similar issue in Firefox. The Mozilla Security Blog post about the URL protocol handling flaw states that “defense in depth is the best way to protect people” (although that weblog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zend</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-9381</link>
		<dc:creator>zend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/#comment-9381</guid>
		<description>A hacker could use Firefox to launch another application, and possibly run malicious instructions. Now there is even some speculation that the bug is not even the fault of the browser, but is actually a flaw in Windows. Man, I can’t remember the last time that no one would take responsibility for a security-related bug like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A hacker could use Firefox to launch another application, and possibly run malicious instructions. Now there is even some speculation that the bug is not even the fault of the browser, but is actually a flaw in Windows. Man, I can’t remember the last time that no one would take responsibility for a security-related bug like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Official Blog for Goviphosting.com &#187; Mozilla rushes out second Firefox patch this month</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Official Blog for Goviphosting.com &#187; Mozilla rushes out second Firefox patch this month</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/#comment-436</guid>
		<description>[...] just a problem with IE. It turns out, it is a problem with Firefox as well,&#8221; she said in a blog posting. &#8220;We should have caught this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just a problem with IE. It turns out, it is a problem with Firefox as well,&#8221; she said in a blog posting. &#8220;We should have caught this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.6 Released</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.6 Released</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/#comment-434</guid>
		<description>[...] been hypocritical not to fix the similar issue in Firefox. The Mozilla Security Blog post about the URL protocol handling flaw states that &#8220;defense in depth is the best way to protect people&#8221; (although that weblog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been hypocritical not to fix the similar issue in Firefox. The Mozilla Security Blog post about the URL protocol handling flaw states that &#8220;defense in depth is the best way to protect people&#8221; (although that weblog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla Firefox v2.0.0.6 is available</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla Firefox v2.0.0.6 is available</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/#comment-430</guid>
		<description>[...] just released Firefox 2.0.0.6 which contains a security patch to mitigate the issue described here. The patch enables percent-encoding for spaces and double-quotes in URIs handed off to external [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just released Firefox 2.0.0.6 which contains a security patch to mitigate the issue described here. The patch enables percent-encoding for spaces and double-quotes in URIs handed off to external [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla Firefox v2.0.0.6 is available</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla Firefox v2.0.0.6 is available</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/#comment-429</guid>
		<description>[...] have just released Firefox 2.0.0.6 which contains a security patch to mitigate the issue described here. The patch enables percent-encoding for spaces and double-quotes in URIs handed off to external [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have just released Firefox 2.0.0.6 which contains a security patch to mitigate the issue described here. The patch enables percent-encoding for spaces and double-quotes in URIs handed off to external [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.6 Released &#183; Get Latest Mozilla Firefox Browsers</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.6 Released &#183; Get Latest Mozilla Firefox Browsers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/#comment-421</guid>
		<description>[...] been hypocritical not to fix the similar issue in Firefox. The Mozilla Security Blog post about the URL protocol handling flaw states that &#8220;defense in depth is the best way to protect people&#8221; (although that weblog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been hypocritical not to fix the similar issue in Firefox. The Mozilla Security Blog post about the URL protocol handling flaw states that &#8220;defense in depth is the best way to protect people&#8221; (although that weblog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 2.0.0.6 - Yes, it&#8217;s Another Update - CyberNet News</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 2.0.0.6 - Yes, it&#8217;s Another Update - CyberNet News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/07/23/related-security-issue-in-url-protocol-handling-on-windows/#comment-415</guid>
		<description>[...] To the surprise of the Mozilla team, Firefox (prior to 2.0.0.6) was capable of doing the exact same thing that Internet Explorer was criticized for. A hacker could use Firefox to launch another application, and possibly run malicious instructions. Now there is even some speculation that the bug is not even the fault of the browser, but is actually a flaw in Windows. Man, I can&#8217;t remember the last time that no one would take responsibility for a security-related bug like this. Pretty soon they&#8217;ll probably be blaming the clock in the System tray for it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To the surprise of the Mozilla team, Firefox (prior to 2.0.0.6) was capable of doing the exact same thing that Internet Explorer was criticized for. A hacker could use Firefox to launch another application, and possibly run malicious instructions. Now there is even some speculation that the bug is not even the fault of the browser, but is actually a flaw in Windows. Man, I can&rsquo;t remember the last time that no one would take responsibility for a security-related bug like this. Pretty soon they&rsquo;ll probably be blaming the clock in the System tray for it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
