<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Status update for Chrome Protocol Directory Traversal issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/01/29/status-update-for-chrome-protocol-directory-traversal-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/01/29/status-update-for-chrome-protocol-directory-traversal-issue/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:36:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Walden</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/01/29/status-update-for-chrome-protocol-directory-traversal-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-17163</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Walden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/01/29/status-update-for-chrome-protocol-directory-traversal-issue/#comment-17163</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Ronald, but I don&#039;t see &quot;boasting&quot; or &quot;blame&quot; there -- just matter-of-fact statements, and a note that extensions that can update quickly enough can reduce the number of vulnerable users until the real fix happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Ronald, but I don&#8217;t see &#8220;boasting&#8221; or &#8220;blame&#8221; there &#8212; just matter-of-fact statements, and a note that extensions that can update quickly enough can reduce the number of vulnerable users until the real fix happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald van den Heetkamp</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/01/29/status-update-for-chrome-protocol-directory-traversal-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-17143</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald van den Heetkamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/01/29/status-update-for-chrome-protocol-directory-traversal-issue/#comment-17143</guid>
		<description>Some comments:

http://www.0x000000.com/index.php?i=503</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some comments:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.0x000000.com/index.php?i=503" rel="nofollow">http://www.0&#215;000000.com/index.php?i=503</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Barnabe</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/01/29/status-update-for-chrome-protocol-directory-traversal-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-16873</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Barnabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/01/29/status-update-for-chrome-protocol-directory-traversal-issue/#comment-16873</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m fairly sure you can release 2.0.0.12 and get it into the hands of users before I can new versions of my extensions approved and updated on my users&#039; systems, so I&#039;ll just wait this one out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m fairly sure you can release 2.0.0.12 and get it into the hands of users before I can new versions of my extensions approved and updated on my users&#8217; systems, so I&#8217;ll just wait this one out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
