<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Security Issue Under Investigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/06/18/new-security-issue-under-investigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/06/18/new-security-issue-under-investigation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:36:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linda Owen</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/06/18/new-security-issue-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-104279</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=35#comment-104279</guid>
		<description>I have a virus that  says mozilla  fire fox  it is antivirus xp2009 i can not get it off is this a part of my fire fox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a virus that  says mozilla  fire fox  it is antivirus xp2009 i can not get it off is this a part of my fire fox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/06/18/new-security-issue-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-102117</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 14:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=35#comment-102117</guid>
		<description>Hey nothing is bullet proof . I have used Fire Fox for a long time with
no problems . They have the best [money] can buy , pun . To be blunt if
money was the issue here I would put it with Mozilla every time . They
do what the big money can not, or will not do , look out for us . 
Keep up the good work Mozilla, I and others like and app. your efforts .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey nothing is bullet proof . I have used Fire Fox for a long time with<br />
no problems . They have the best [money] can buy , pun . To be blunt if<br />
money was the issue here I would put it with Mozilla every time . They<br />
do what the big money can not, or will not do , look out for us .<br />
Keep up the good work Mozilla, I and others like and app. your efforts .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lenney</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/06/18/new-security-issue-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-101581</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lenney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 14:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=35#comment-101581</guid>
		<description>I downloaded 3.0, have attempted to remove it, and am told that the browser must be closed in order to remove the browser. The browser appears to be closed each time I go to Add/Remove programs. Can anyone help me?

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I downloaded 3.0, have attempted to remove it, and am told that the browser must be closed in order to remove the browser. The browser appears to be closed each time I go to Add/Remove programs. Can anyone help me?</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LINDA</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/06/18/new-security-issue-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-101014</link>
		<dc:creator>LINDA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=35#comment-101014</guid>
		<description>I JUST SWITCHED TO MOZILLA FROM IE ...I TRIED FF YEARS AGO BUT DID NOT LIKE IT AS WELL, BUT YOU GUYS HAVE CERTAINLY IMPROVED AND I LOVE IT AND I&#039;M NEVER GOING BACK TO IE--TOO MANY PROBLEMS WITH IE ITS AWFUL NOW--WORST IT&#039;S EVER BEEN, SPY, AND ADWARE IS INCREDIBLE AND ERROR MESSAGES AND ALWAYS SHUTTING DOWN--I THINK BILL GATES HAS GOT SOME MEAN COMPETITION ON HIS HANDS AND HIS EMPIRE WILL BE CRASHING DOWN SOON! THANKS FF  KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, CAUSE IF YOU START SUCKING THEN IT&#039;S ON TO GOOGLE....LINDA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I JUST SWITCHED TO MOZILLA FROM IE &#8230;I TRIED FF YEARS AGO BUT DID NOT LIKE IT AS WELL, BUT YOU GUYS HAVE CERTAINLY IMPROVED AND I LOVE IT AND I&#8217;M NEVER GOING BACK TO IE&#8211;TOO MANY PROBLEMS WITH IE ITS AWFUL NOW&#8211;WORST IT&#8217;S EVER BEEN, SPY, AND ADWARE IS INCREDIBLE AND ERROR MESSAGES AND ALWAYS SHUTTING DOWN&#8211;I THINK BILL GATES HAS GOT SOME MEAN COMPETITION ON HIS HANDS AND HIS EMPIRE WILL BE CRASHING DOWN SOON! THANKS FF  KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, CAUSE IF YOU START SUCKING THEN IT&#8217;S ON TO GOOGLE&#8230;.LINDA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise Larsen</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/06/18/new-security-issue-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-100363</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise Larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=35#comment-100363</guid>
		<description>I was running Firefox 2 yesterday and suddenly the screen was taken over by a screaming warning about spyware with 2 fixes that I needed to install IMMEDIATELY because my computer was compromised and at least one of the problems was CRITICAL. The caps are not mine. However, the references were to Microsoft, and I have a Mac. Also, there were words misspelled  and a couple of grammatical oddities. When I declined to install - only then - a Firefox notice appeared. I finally got rid of the warning by shutting down Firefox, and today I upgraded to Firefox 3.

Either this was a viral problem or I do actually have trouble on my Mac. I can&#039;t find the warning at the moment and have not been able to get through to Firefox. I would like to know what&#039;s up.          lel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was running Firefox 2 yesterday and suddenly the screen was taken over by a screaming warning about spyware with 2 fixes that I needed to install IMMEDIATELY because my computer was compromised and at least one of the problems was CRITICAL. The caps are not mine. However, the references were to Microsoft, and I have a Mac. Also, there were words misspelled  and a couple of grammatical oddities. When I declined to install &#8211; only then &#8211; a Firefox notice appeared. I finally got rid of the warning by shutting down Firefox, and today I upgraded to Firefox 3.</p>
<p>Either this was a viral problem or I do actually have trouble on my Mac. I can&#8217;t find the warning at the moment and have not been able to get through to Firefox. I would like to know what&#8217;s up.          lel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Window Snyder</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/06/18/new-security-issue-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-73591</link>
		<dc:creator>Window Snyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=35#comment-73591</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s fixed in Firefox 3.0.1 and Firefox 2.0.0.16.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s fixed in Firefox 3.0.1 and Firefox 2.0.0.16.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Schejbal</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/06/18/new-security-issue-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-73225</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Schejbal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=35#comment-73225</guid>
		<description>Erm, this issue is now nearly a month old. Are the mozilla people trying to compete with microsoft in the &quot;who leaves the gaping hole open longer&quot;? ;-)

No, seriously: A month should be more than enough time to create a patch for a critical issue. Is there some ETA when we can expect it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, this issue is now nearly a month old. Are the mozilla people trying to compete with microsoft in the &#8220;who leaves the gaping hole open longer&#8221;? <img src='http://blog.mozilla.com/security/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>No, seriously: A month should be more than enough time to create a patch for a critical issue. Is there some ETA when we can expect it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Quigley</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/06/18/new-security-issue-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-72016</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Quigley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 05:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=35#comment-72016</guid>
		<description>Wondering if there is any news on when a fix will be out. My work has suspended use of Firefox and made us go back to IE7 and using the excuse of this problem to keep us from using the browser we like. Firefox works so much better for us that are sight impaired I hope all can be fixed soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wondering if there is any news on when a fix will be out. My work has suspended use of Firefox and made us go back to IE7 and using the excuse of this problem to keep us from using the browser we like. Firefox works so much better for us that are sight impaired I hope all can be fixed soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honey Singh</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/06/18/new-security-issue-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-69466</link>
		<dc:creator>Honey Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=35#comment-69466</guid>
		<description>Firefox in no doubt superior than any other browser like IE but some times we face issues with CSS (all different in ie,FF and opera).
FF is open source application any one can test it but i&#039;ll sure appreciate ZDI group for not disclosing the flaws method publicly.
Hope Mozilla team will patch this flaw asap.
One again cheers from http://honeytechblog.com to Mozilla Team for such large no of downloads.
Waiting for fixes rather than finding the flaws code on the net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox in no doubt superior than any other browser like IE but some times we face issues with CSS (all different in ie,FF and opera).<br />
FF is open source application any one can test it but i&#8217;ll sure appreciate ZDI group for not disclosing the flaws method publicly.<br />
Hope Mozilla team will patch this flaw asap.<br />
One again cheers from <a href="http://honeytechblog.com" rel="nofollow">http://honeytechblog.com</a> to Mozilla Team for such large no of downloads.<br />
Waiting for fixes rather than finding the flaws code on the net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Fiotakis</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/06/18/new-security-issue-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-68862</link>
		<dc:creator>George Fiotakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=35#comment-68862</guid>
		<description>Actually this is a very nice chance to prove that security is one of the main priorities of mozilla. It just takes a quick fix to gain even more publicity. After all, there&#039;s no chance that a piece of software can be 100% bullet-proof. A browser&#039;s security should be decided on how fast each hole is fixed, so if it&#039;s fixed quickly, it could be turned to a positive news headline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually this is a very nice chance to prove that security is one of the main priorities of mozilla. It just takes a quick fix to gain even more publicity. After all, there&#8217;s no chance that a piece of software can be 100% bullet-proof. A browser&#8217;s security should be decided on how fast each hole is fixed, so if it&#8217;s fixed quickly, it could be turned to a positive news headline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
