<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mozilla Security Blog &#187; Vulnerabilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/security/category/vulnerabilities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 21:13:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Critical vulnerability in Firefox 3.5 and Firefox 3.6</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/10/26/critical-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5-and-firefox-3-6/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/10/26/critical-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5-and-firefox-3-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Sterne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update (Oct 27, 2010 @ 20:12): A fix for this vulnerability has been released for Firefox and Thunderbird users. Firefox 3.6.12 and 3.5.15 security updates now available Thunderbird 3.1.6 and 3.0.10 security updates now available Issue: Mozilla is aware of a critical vulnerability affecting Firefox 3.5 and Firefox 3.6 users. We have received reports from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Update </strong>(Oct 27, 2010 @ 20:12)<strong>:</strong><br />
A fix for this vulnerability has been released for Firefox and Thunderbird users.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2010/10/27/firefox-3-6-12-and-3-5-15-security-updates-now-available/">Firefox 3.6.12 and 3.5.15 security updates now available</a><br />
<a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2010/10/27/thunderbird-3-1-6-and-3-0-10-security-updates-now-available/">Thunderbird 3.1.6 and 3.0.10 security updates now available</a></p>
<p><strong>Issue:</strong><br />
Mozilla is aware of a critical vulnerability affecting Firefox 3.5 and Firefox 3.6 users.  We have received reports from several security research firms that exploit code leveraging this vulnerability has been detected in the wild.</p>
<p><strong>Impact to users:</strong><br />
Users who visited an infected site could have been affected by the malware through the vulnerability. The trojan was initially reported as live on the Nobel Peace Prize site, and that specific site is now being blocked by Firefox&#8217;s built-in malware protection.  However, the exploit code could still be live on other websites.</p>
<p><strong>Status:</strong><br />
We have diagnosed the issue and are currently developing a fix, which will be pushed out to Firefox users as soon as the fix has been properly tested.</p>
<p>In the meantime, users can protect themselves by doing either of the following:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/JavaScript#Enabling_and_disabling_JavaScript">Disabling JavaScript</a> in Firefox</li>
<li>Using the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/722/">NoScript</a> Add-on</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Credit:</strong><br />
Morten Kråkvik of Telenor SOC</p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
Brandon Sterne<br />
Man-in-the-middle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/10/26/critical-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5-and-firefox-3-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 3.6.2 Released</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/03/22/firefox-3-6-2-released/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/03/22/firefox-3-6-2-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Adamski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mozilla has accelerated its timetable and released Firefox 3.6.2 ahead of schedule. This release contains a number of security fixes, including a fix to Secunia Advisory SA38608 which was previously discussed on this blog when we were first made aware of and were then able to confirm the issue. For additional information please see Mozilla [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mozilla has accelerated its timetable and released Firefox 3.6.2 ahead of schedule. This release contains a number of security fixes, including a fix to <a href="http://secunia.com/advisories/38608/">Secunia Advisory SA38608</a> which was previously discussed on this blog when we were <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/02/22/secunia-advisory-sa38608/">first made aware of</a> and were then <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/03/18/update-on-secunia-advisory-sa38608/">able to confirm</a> the issue.</p>
<p>For additional information please see <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2010/mfsa2010-08.html">Mozilla Foundation&#8217;s Security Advisory MFSA-10-08</a> as well as the <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/3.6.2/releasenotes">Firefox 3.6.2 Release Notes</a>. We urge users to promptly update to this release by selecting &#8220;Check for Updates&#8230;&#8221; from the &#8220;Help&#8221; menu, or by visiting <a href="https://www.mozilla.com/">https://www.mozilla.com/</a> for a free download.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/03/22/firefox-3-6-2-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secunia Advisory SA38608</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/02/22/secunia-advisory-sa38608/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/02/22/secunia-advisory-sa38608/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Adamski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mozilla is aware of the claim of a zero-day in Firefox as posted here: http://secunia.com/advisories/38608/.  We cannot confirm the report as we have received no details regarding the reported vulnerability, such as a proof-of-concept or steps to reproduce.  We&#8217;ve attempted to contact the researcher who discovered the issue but have not received a response. Mozilla [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="magicdomid320"><span>Mozilla is aware of the claim of a  zero-day in Firefox as posted here: </span><span><a href="http://secunia.com/advisories/38608/">http://secunia.com/advisories/38608/</a></span><span>.  We cannot confirm the report as we  have received no details regarding the reported vulnerability, such as a  proof-of-concept or steps to reproduce.  We&#8217;ve </span><span>attempted</span><span> to contact the researcher who  discovered the issue but have not received a response.</span></div>
<div><span><br />
</span></div>
<div id="magicdomid315"><span>Mozilla takes  all</span><span> reports of</span><span> security vulnerabilities seriously.   As always, if you have information about security issues, please send  details to security</span><span>@</span><span>mozilla</span><span>.</span><span>org.</span></div>
<div><span>Lucas Adamski, Mozilla Security<br />
</span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/02/22/secunia-advisory-sa38608/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Issues With Two Experimental Add-Ons</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/02/05/security-issues-with-two-experimental-add-ons/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/02/05/security-issues-with-two-experimental-add-ons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Adamski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Important Note: One of the malware results has been verified to be a false positive.  Further details are available here: http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2010/02/09/update-on-the-amo-security-issue/ Original blog entry follows below. Two add-ons in the experimental section of addons.mozilla.org were found to be containing malware.  These were not originally detected with the anti-malware scanning tools that we have been using.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Important Note:</strong> One of the malware results has been verified to be a false positive.  Further details are available here: <a title="http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2010/02/09/update-on-the-amo-security-issue/" href="http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2010/02/09/update-on-the-amo-security-issue/" target="_blank">http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2010/02/09/update-on-the-amo-security-issue/</a> </em></p>
<p><em>Original blog entry follows below.</em></p>
<p>Two add-ons in the experimental section of addons.mozilla.org were found to be containing malware.  These were not originally detected with the anti-malware scanning tools that we have been using.  We have since increased the number of scanning tools, and will be taking additional steps to minimize the risk of further incidents.  Full details of the issue and recommended mitigation steps are here on the AMO blog:</p>
<p><a title="http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2010/02/04/please-read-security-issue-on-amo/" href="http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2010/02/04/please-read-security-issue-on-amo/">http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2010/02/04/please-read-security-issue-on-amo/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/02/05/security-issues-with-two-experimental-add-ons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>.NET Framework Assistant Blocked to Disarm Security Vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/10/16/net-framework-assistant-blocked-to-disarm-security-vulnerability/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/10/16/net-framework-assistant-blocked-to-disarm-security-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johnathan Nightingale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Shaver, Mozilla&#8217;s Vice President of Engineering writes: I&#8217;ve previously posted about the .NET Framework Assistant add-on that was delivered via Windows Update earlier this year. It&#8217;s recently surfaced that it has a serious security vulnerability, and Microsoft is recommending that all users disable the add-on. Because of the difficulties some users have had entirely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Shaver, Mozilla&#8217;s Vice President of Engineering <a href="http://shaver.off.net/diary/2009/10/16/net-framework-assistant-blocked-to-disarm-security-vulnerability/">writes</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ve previously posted about the <a href="http://shaver.off.net/diary/2009/06/02/dealing-with-the-net-clickonce-add-on/">.NET Framework Assistant</a> add-on that was delivered via Windows Update earlier this year.  It&#8217;s recently surfaced that it has a <a href="http://shaver.off.net/diary/2009/06/02/dealing-with-the-net-clickonce-add-on/">serious security vulnerability</a>, and Microsoft is recommending that all users disable the add-on.</p>
<p>Because of the difficulties some users have had entirely removing the add-on, and because of the severity of the risk it represents if not disabled, we contacted Microsoft today to indicate that we were looking to disable the extension and plugin for all users via our <a href="https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Add-ons+Blocklist">blocklisting mechanism</a>.  Microsoft agreed with the plan, and we put the blocklist entry live immediately.  (Some users are already seeing it disabled, less than an hour after we added it!)</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Update (Sunday Oct 18, 6:30pm PDT):</strong> Microsoft has now confirmed that the Framework Assistant add-on is not a vector for this attack, and we have removed the entry from the blocklist. We are also working on a mechanism to allow Firefox users to re-enable the WPF plugin ahead of its eventual removal from the blocklist. For more information, see Mike Shaver&#8217;s <a href="http://shaver.off.net/diary/2009/10/18/update-net-framework-assistant-clickonce-support-unblocked/">latest blog post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/10/16/net-framework-assistant-blocked-to-disarm-security-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>URL bar spoofing vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/07/28/url-bar-spoofing-vulnerability/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/07/28/url-bar-spoofing-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Adamski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Issue The URL in the address bar can be spoofed when a new window or tab is opened by a malicious web page. Impact to users If a user visits a page hosting this malicious code, a new window or tab can be opened with a faked URL.  There is no way of determining if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Issue</strong></p>
<p>The URL in the address bar can be spoofed when a new window or tab is opened by a malicious web page.</p>
<p><strong>Impact to users</strong></p>
<p>If a user visits a page hosting this malicious code, a new window or tab can be opened with a faked URL.  There is no way of determining if the URL is authentic.  This could result in the user disclosing confidential information to the malicious site, known as a phishing attack.</p>
<p><strong>Status</strong></p>
<p>This vulnerability is known to affect all current versions of Firefox.  Mozilla is actively working on <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=451898" target="_blank">fixing this vulnerability</a>.  Users can mitigate this vulnerability by only sharing confidential information with websites that were opened from a bookmark, a trusted source, or by manually opening a new tab or window and entering a URL.</p>
<p><strong>Credit</strong></p>
<p>This issue was originally reported by Juan Pablo Lopez Yacubian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/07/28/url-bar-spoofing-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>milw0rm 9158 &#8220;stack overflow&#8221; crash not exploitable (CVE-2009-2479)</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/07/19/milw0rm-9158-stack-overflow-crash-not-exploitable-cve-2009-2479/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/07/19/milw0rm-9158-stack-overflow-crash-not-exploitable-cve-2009-2479/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last few days, there have been several reports (including one via SANS) of a bug in Firefox related to handling of certain very long Unicode strings. While these strings can result in crashes of some versions of Firefox, the reports by press and various security agencies have incorrectly indicated that this is an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the last few days, there have been several reports (including one <a href="http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=6829">via SANS</a>) of a bug in Firefox related to handling of certain very long Unicode strings.  While these strings can result in crashes of some versions of Firefox, the reports by press and various security agencies have incorrectly indicated that this is an exploitable bug.  Our analysis indicates that it is not, and we have seen no example of exploitability.</p>
<h2>Details</h2>
<p>On Windows, Firefox 3.0.x and Firefox 3.5.x are terminated due to an uncaught exception during an attempt to allocate a very large string buffer; this termination is safe and immediate, and does not permit the execution of attacker code.</p>
<p>On the Macintosh in Firefox 3.0.x and 3.5.x, a crash occurs inside the ATSUI system library (part of OS X), due to what appears to be a failure to check allocation results.  This issue is likely to affect any application using the recommended text-handling libraries on OS X.  We have reported this issue to Apple, but in the event that they do not provide a fix we will look to implement mitigations in Mozilla code.  We recommend that other developers who use these libraries consider a similar practice, and we have added mitigations in the past for similar bugs in these libraries.</p>
<p>On Linux, the problem is similar to that on Mac: there is an abort in system libraries (pango, glib, libc).  Due to the wide variation of Linux libraries and versions deployed, and different compilation options chosen by Linux distributors for Firefox, the details of the crash report may vary between machines.</p>
<p>As a result of our analysis, we do not believe that this represents an exploitable vulnerability in Firefox. Further, we believe that the <a href="http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/51729">IBM</a> report is in error, and that the severity rating in the <a href="http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2009-2479">National Vulnerability Database report</a> is incorrect.  We have contacted them and hope to resolve the inaccuracies shortly.</p>
<p>[Updated (July 19, 8:50pm EDT): thanks to Larry Seltzer for bringing to our attention that Firefox 3.5.x will indeed still crash using the provided PoC on Windows, at least for some users.]</p>
<p>[Updated (July 20, 8:50am EDT): the <a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35707">SecurityFocus</a> report has been updated to indicate that it is only a denial of service issue.  This is consistent with our analysis; thanks to SecurityFocus for correcting their error.]</p>
<p>[Updated (July 20, 9:15am EDT): added results for Linux, thanks to Kevin Brosnan.]</p>
<p>Mike Shaver<br />
VP Engineering, Mozilla Corporation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/07/19/milw0rm-9158-stack-overflow-crash-not-exploitable-cve-2009-2479/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical JavaScript vulnerability in Firefox 3.5</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/07/14/critical-javascript-vulnerability-in-firefox-35/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/07/14/critical-javascript-vulnerability-in-firefox-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Sterne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Issue A bug discovered last week in Firefox 3.5&#8242;s Just-in-time (JIT) JavaScript compiler was disclosed publicly yesterday. It is a critical vulnerability that can be used to execute malicious code. Impact The vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker who tricks a victim into viewing a malicious Web page containing the exploit code. The vulnerability [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Issue</strong></p>
<p>A bug discovered last week in Firefox 3.5&#8242;s Just-in-time (JIT) JavaScript compiler was disclosed <a href="http://www.milw0rm.com/exploits/9137">publicly</a> yesterday.  It is a critical vulnerability that can be used to execute malicious code.</p>
<p><strong>Impact</strong></p>
<p>The vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker who tricks a victim into viewing a malicious Web page containing the exploit code.  The vulnerability can be mitigated by disabling the JIT in the JavaScript engine.  To do so:</p>
<ol>
<li>Enter <code>about:config</code> in the browser&#8217;s location bar.</li>
<li>Type <code>jit</code> in the Filter box at the top of the config editor.</li>
<li>Double-click the line containing <code>javascript.options.jit.content</code> setting the value to false.</li>
</ol>
<p>Note that disabling the JIT will result in decreased JavaScript performance and is only recommended as a temporary security measure.  Once users have been received the security update containing the fix for this issue, they should restore the JIT setting to true by:</p>
<ol>
<li>Enter <code>about:config</code> in the browser&#8217;s location bar.</li>
<li>Type <code>jit</code> in the Filter box at the top of the config editor.</li>
<li>Double-click the line containing <code>javascript.options.jit.content</code> setting the value to true.</li>
</ol>
<p>Alternatively, users can disable the JIT by running Firefox in <a href="http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Safe+Mode">Safe Mode</a>.  Windows users can do so by selecting <code>Mozilla Firefox (Safe Mode)</code> from the Mozilla Firefox folder.</p>
<p><strong>Status</strong></p>
<p>Mozilla developers are working on a fix for this issue and a Firefox security update will be sent out as soon as the fix is completed and tested.</p>
<p><strong>Credit</strong></p>
<p>Zbyte reported this issue to Mozilla and Lucas Kruijswijk helped reduce the exploit test case.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: This vulnerability has been fixed in <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/3.5.1/releasenotes/">Firefox 3.5.1</a>, released Thursday, July 16, 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/07/14/critical-javascript-vulnerability-in-firefox-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CanSecWest 2009 Pwn2Own Exploit and XSL Transform Vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/03/26/cansecwest-2009-pwn2own-exploit-and-xsl-transform-vulnerability/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/03/26/cansecwest-2009-pwn2own-exploit-and-xsl-transform-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Adamski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Issue The pwn2own bug that Nils discovered at CanSecWest 2009 and the XSLT vulnerability recently made public by Guido Landi (http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34235) are both critical issues that can result in malicious code execution. Impact These issues can be exploited by tricking a user into visiting a malicious web page hosting the exploit code. The pwn2own bug [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Issue</strong></p>
<p>The pwn2own bug that Nils discovered at CanSecWest 2009 and the XSLT vulnerability recently made public by Guido Landi (<a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34235">http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34235</a>) are both critical issues that can result in malicious code execution.</p>
<p><strong>Impact</strong></p>
<p>These issues can be exploited by tricking a user into visiting a malicious web page hosting the exploit code.  The pwn2own bug can be mitigated by disabling JavaScript.</p>
<p><strong>Status</strong></p>
<p>Both issues have been investigated and fixes have been developed which are now undergoing quality assurance testing.  These fixes will be included in the upcoming <a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Releases/Firefox_3.0.8">Firefox 3.0.8</a> release, due to be released by April 1.  You can follow our work in <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485217">bugzilla</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Credit</strong></p>
<p>The pwn2own bug was reported to Mozilla by Nils via the Zero Day Initiative (ZDI).  The XSLT issue was discovered on <a href="http://www.milw0rm.com/exploits/8285">http://www.milw0rm.com/exploits/8285</a>, credited to Guido Landi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/03/26/cansecwest-2009-pwn2own-exploit-and-xsl-transform-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Importance of Good Metrics</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/12/15/the-importance-of-good-metrics/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/12/15/the-importance-of-good-metrics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johnathan Nightingale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/security/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been some interest in the last few days about a recent report from a company called Bit9 about application vulnerabilities. While we&#8217;re always happy to see stories that focus on educating our users about security, there are some problems with Bit9&#8242;s methodology that hinder its ability to draw any meaningful conclusions. Bit9 says [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been some interest in the last few days about a <a title="Bit9 Press Release" href="http://www.bit9.com/news-events/press-release-details.php?id=102">recent report from a company called Bit9</a> about application vulnerabilities. While we&#8217;re always happy to see stories that focus on educating our users about security, there are some problems with Bit9&#8242;s methodology that hinder its ability to draw any meaningful conclusions.</p>
<p>Bit9 says it drew up this list by identifying popular applications that have had a critical vulnerability reported in 2008. This is an ineffective test, as it rewards software companies that conceal their security vulnerabilities. Mozilla focuses a great deal of energy on building world class code, and we stand by our reputation on security; we don&#8217;t play games with it.</p>
<p>Mozilla security process involves regularly identifying, fixing, testing, and releasing security updates to keep our users safe, and we do that in a public way so that others can scrutinize our processes and help make them better. To suggest that this openness is a weakness because it means that we have &#8220;reported vulnerabilities&#8221; is to miss the reality: that software has bugs. A product&#8217;s responsiveness to those bugs and its ability to contain them quickly and effectively is a much more meaningful metric than counting them.</p>
<p>Bit9 seems to understand this in its focus on application support for updates, but again it fails to account for the real world experience.  Firefox does not deliver WSUS updates, but our built-in update mechanism requires no user intervention, and we consistently see <a title="Time to Deployment" href="http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/06/18/time-to-deploy-improvement-of-25-percent/">90% adoption within six days</a> of a new update being released.</p>
<p>The Firefox vulnerabilities Bit9 discusses are long-since fixed, with the majority of these fixes coming within days of it being announced.  That is the real measure of application security: are known vulnerabilities fixed promptly, tested carefully, and deployed thoroughly? When people have asked that question, Firefox and Mozilla have <a title="Firefox users most likely to run current version" href="http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/07/02/firefox-users-most-likely-to-run-latest-version-of-the-browser/">consistently come out ahead</a>.</p>
<p>Bug counting is unfortunately common because it&#8217;s easy, but it should not be a substitute for real security measurement. This is why we&#8217;ve continued to work on things like the <a title="Mozilla security metrics project" href="http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/07/02/mozilla-security-metrics-project/">Mozilla security metrics project</a>, to help people make informed decisions about the security of their software. We invite people who are interested to be a part of that process.</p>
<p>Johnathan Nightingale<br />
Human Shield</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/12/15/the-importance-of-good-metrics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

