http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/2007/02/13/community-participation-stats/ localization and community at mozilla Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:48:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/2007/02/13/community-participation-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-19080 Shopautodotca Seocontest Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:32:07 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/2007/02/13/community-participation-stats/#comment-19080 I think you are right in your conclusion to include everyone who submitted a patch because he/she might be the one who sees it that will enhnce the product for the better. I think you are right in your conclusion to include everyone who submitted a patch because he/she might be the one who sees it that will enhnce the product for the better.

]]> http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/2007/02/13/community-participation-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-6213 seth bindernagel Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:46:37 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/2007/02/13/community-participation-stats/#comment-6213 We tried to screen out all contributors who are getting paid by a full-time employer. We wanted to see how many unpaid volunteers we have on the project. Next time we run the stats, we will have a lot of options to consider. Anyone have any ideas on the best way to gauge or measure volunteer contributions? I would be happy to take your suggestions and incorporate them next time. We tried to screen out all contributors who are getting paid by a full-time employer. We wanted to see how many unpaid volunteers we have on the project. Next time we run the stats, we will have a lot of options to consider. Anyone have any ideas on the best way to gauge or measure volunteer contributions? I would be happy to take your suggestions and incorporate them next time.

]]> http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/2007/02/13/community-participation-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-6199 santiago roza Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:17:16 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/2007/02/13/community-participation-stats/#comment-6199 does this analysis take into account the *many* developers paid by google / redhat / ibm / novell / etc, who are neither "mozilla employees and contractors", nor (unpaid) "volunteers"? does this analysis take into account the *many* developers paid by google / redhat / ibm / novell / etc, who are neither “mozilla employees and contractors”, nor (unpaid) “volunteers”?

]]> http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/2007/02/13/community-participation-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-5800 seth bindernagel Wed, 14 Feb 2007 04:44:42 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/2007/02/13/community-participation-stats/#comment-5800 The number is ~125. But, remember that it is over 50 patches submitted, so the number will be bigger when I re-run the analysis. I suspect it will change pretty dramatically. The number is ~125. But, remember that it is over 50 patches submitted, so the number will be bigger when I re-run the analysis. I suspect it will change pretty dramatically.

]]> http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/2007/02/13/community-participation-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-5791 Wladimir Palant Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:37:31 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/2007/02/13/community-participation-stats/#comment-5791 An interesting question would be: how many people submitted these 27% of the patches? An interesting question would be: how many people submitted these 27% of the patches?

]]>