Mozilla as a socially responsible business
I attended the Economic Summit 2007 conference on Monday, June 11 hosted by the Cal State East Bay SBDC. The conference brought together several leading social entrepreneurs to discuss nuts and bolts of starting a socially responsible organization. I represented Mozilla on a panel and was able to articulate what makes Mozilla special and why we are, in fact, socially responsible.
More and more people in the world of social responsibility are pointing to Mozilla as a leading example of a socially responsible business. Many companies, like Intel, Microsoft, HP, Sun, The Gap, Patagonia, McDonalds…the list goes on and on…have all invested in some form of corporate social responsibility and have either hinted at or stated plainly that it is a strategic imperative for their business. When most hear socially responsible or corporate social responsibility (CSR) or social entrepreneur, a few questions begin to surface:
- What is all this lingo and who cares?
- Do corporations really act responsibly or is it just marketing?
- What is the business case for social responsibility?
I’d like to start a series of blog posts over the next few weeks that begin to discuss these topics, surface other questions, and start to point out why Mozilla is and always has been socially responsible.
How do we fit in and what is all this business lingo (does it really mean anything)? Mozilla’s pursuit of preserving choice and innovation on the Internet is itself very socially responsible.
In fact, I believe we are a leading socially responsible business and a leader in social responsibility. Mitchell and many others at Mozilla might also be classified as social entrepreneurs. I’ve added the wikipedia links to show that these terms are generally accepted inside the world of social enterprise. Maybe you’ve also heard the term corporate social responsibility. Each of these concepts has a nuanced difference that is worth understanding, but they all point to a larger effort for people and companies to become more responsible and conscious corporate citizens.
So much of our community blogs about what they are doing to change the way people experience the Internet and why Mozilla means so much to them. Perhaps you read Tristan’s post last week, or John’s post about what Mozillans wearing their hearts on their sleeves.
Or, maybe some of you read the ending of Shaver’s taking it on the road post on June 11. There, he comments:
I’m emotionally invested in the web, I take threats to its integrity personally and seriously, and I think there’s a fight brewing over the future of how people use technology to communicate, collaborate, do business, and share experiences. I hope to infect some people with my passion on this trip, and come back with a more comprehensive sense of what makes the web special to everyone else.
These are specific types of sentiment that help articulate why Mozilla is socially responsible and concerned about several other pursuits rather than earnings that pile up at the bottom line of an income statement.
By participating in conferences like Net Squared and the Economic Summit, I am beginning to see that Mozilla is gaining more visibility while gaining a reputation of being an innovator in the field of socially responsible business for the Internet and the www.




















Good post, I’m looking forward to more from you on this. Note that back in December 2006 I posted on a related topic, namely Firefox as a socially responsible product.
Please explain exactly what is meant by “socially responsible.” If Mozilla or anybody else is contributing to political causes I oppose, I want to know about that before I contribute to them.
Great point, and, no…nothing political. In fact, political contributions can often be the one aspect that will disqualify an organization from being socially responsible.
Please note, Mozilla makes no political contributions and has no intention to do so. It’s not part of our mission or the Mozilla Manifesto.
For other examples, see http://www.ashoka.org, a global leader in identifying social entrepreneurs. Ashoka will not accept any funding from governments because they feel that the winds of political change can cause very detrimental outcomes in their effort to effect social change.
That’s reassuring — except that “promoting social change” usually means something I would call political. (Or worse — see http://www.activistcash.com for a list of “environmental charities” that actually raise funds for terrorists.)
@John David Galt: so http://www.activistcash.com is backed by an organization called The Center for Consumer Freedom, which self-describes as “a nonprofit coalition of restaurants, food companies, and consumers working together to promote personal responsibility and protect consumer choices.” If you’re going to promote a site, why not disclose fully who’s behind it?
I did a year studying Economics at University and for a long time I have maintained that the internet can create a market, close to perfect competition, where buyers have at their fingertips almost perfect information. Unfortunately Microsoft has dominated software, but I think Mozilla succeeds where others fail due to the open nature of its development. Open source software designed by and for the very same community. Where as big companies choose to be socially responsible by giving money to the community, Mozilla seems to support the development of the community itself.
Here’s the details, via Wikipedia, on the initial backers of The Center for Consumer Freedom: “Alliance Gaming (slot machines), Anheuser-Busch (beer), Bruss Company (steaks and chops), Cargill Processed Meat Products, Davidoff (cigars), Harrah’s (casinos), Overhill Farms (frozen foods), Philip Morris, and Standard Meat Company (steaks).”
Hi seth, I’ve posted some of my thoughts about this on our blog: right here.
Thanks again for writing about these issues, it’s really good stuff.
Hey Seth, am a fellow Clevelander as well (recent Shaker Hts grad, currently undertaking phd work at Oxford in England). Great blog, and always good to see a fellow Clevelander doing good in the world. I noticed you wrote that McDonald’s has invested in social responsibility–am curious to know which specific actions you’re referring to. Also, I’ve co-written a proposal w/ a few oxford friends for a “healthy choices menu” at mcdonald’s. The Business as Agent for World Benefit institute at CWRU has offered to help develop it, but I’d love to send it along to you to gather your opinions if you don’t mind. I’m happy to add you as an author to the proposal, which is only 8pgs long. Anyhow, great ot see this work you’re doing,
take care,
Danny
[...]This really is a useful website. A really good source of information.[...]