Comments on: Localization-QA survey results http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/2009/03/06/localization-qa-survey-results/ localization and community at mozilla Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:49:29 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: sethb http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/2009/03/06/localization-qa-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-138334 sethb Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:31:12 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/?p=363#comment-138334 Other comments I received: 1) Keep l10n testing separate from platform testing; have to keep the testing community working with tools as opposed to those who simply test the actual localization. ** L10n litmus test run is supposed to be a localization test finder; not a platform testing 2) RTL test-runs are in Litmus 3) Need to have the proper and flexible feedback mechanism, is Bugzilla the best? Other comments I received:

1) Keep l10n testing separate from platform testing; have to keep the testing community working with tools as opposed to those who simply test the actual localization.
** L10n litmus test run is supposed to be a localization test finder; not a platform testing

2) RTL test-runs are in Litmus

3) Need to have the proper and flexible feedback mechanism, is Bugzilla the best?

]]> By: flod http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/2009/03/06/localization-qa-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-138258 flod Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:05:07 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/?p=363#comment-138258 Hi Seth, trackbacks don't seem to work, so here's a <a href="http://www.yetanothertechblog.com/2009/03/07/about-localization-qa-survey-results/" rel="nofollow">manual trackback</a> ;-) Hi Seth, trackbacks don’t seem to work, so here’s a manual trackback ;-)

]]>