<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It works!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2007/06/19/it-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2007/06/19/it-works/</link>
	<description>Just another Blog.mozilla.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tglek</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2007/06/19/it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>tglek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2007/06/19/it-works/#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t rewire oink. I just added some basic API so it is aware of macro expansion. The secret sauce is in the modified MCPP which outputs an undo-log while doing macro expansion.

And yes it is possible to make oink apps work directly on .cpp/.h files. However it&#039;d be done the same way as a classical C compiler. Ie the apps would just run the preprocessor for you.

To get the source, ask me on irc. I&#039;m taras on irc.mozilla.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t rewire oink. I just added some basic API so it is aware of macro expansion. The secret sauce is in the modified MCPP which outputs an undo-log while doing macro expansion.</p>
<p>And yes it is possible to make oink apps work directly on .cpp/.h files. However it&#8217;d be done the same way as a classical C compiler. Ie the apps would just run the preprocessor for you.</p>
<p>To get the source, ask me on irc. I&#8217;m taras on irc.mozilla.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fredrik</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2007/06/19/it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2007/06/19/it-works/#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>Does the CPP-awareness of the rewired Oink also imply that it will work directly on the .cpp/.h files, rather than having to be applied to the intermediary (preprocessed) .i files? 

Essentially, is it now (large parts of) a compiler front-end with extra tasty meta-data sugar?

Also, does one have to wait until the patches are pushed upstream to Oink before it&#039;s possible to get to poke at it? 

I&#039;m curious. And impressed. Nice work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the CPP-awareness of the rewired Oink also imply that it will work directly on the .cpp/.h files, rather than having to be applied to the intermediary (preprocessed) .i files? </p>
<p>Essentially, is it now (large parts of) a compiler front-end with extra tasty meta-data sugar?</p>
<p>Also, does one have to wait until the patches are pushed upstream to Oink before it&#8217;s possible to get to poke at it? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious. And impressed. Nice work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

