<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Counting down to a Dehydra release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2008/04/29/counting-down-to-a-dehydra-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2008/04/29/counting-down-to-a-dehydra-release/</link>
	<description>Just another Blog.mozilla.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:50:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ANKUR</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2008/04/29/counting-down-to-a-dehydra-release/comment-page-1/#comment-17108</link>
		<dc:creator>ANKUR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2008/04/29/counting-down-to-a-dehydra-release/#comment-17108</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I am working on the static analysis of my code in GCC 4.3.0.but new in this field
can u please help me regarding some of the following details that i need :-

a) how dehydra works internally on the AST.
b) can i access the whole tree in details using dehydra .
c) Is separate AST is created for each function in the code or whole code is built on one AST. if possible please provide me any sample of the AST for a particular code.
c) how loops are represented in AST??  
d)can i get some examples of the running javascripts that i can run using  dehydra over my c++ code or give me  any link regarding javascripts samples( of dehydra) for testing purpose of  AST of my c++ codes.

please reply soon.
ANKUR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I am working on the static analysis of my code in GCC 4.3.0.but new in this field<br />
can u please help me regarding some of the following details that i need :-</p>
<p>a) how dehydra works internally on the AST.<br />
b) can i access the whole tree in details using dehydra .<br />
c) Is separate AST is created for each function in the code or whole code is built on one AST. if possible please provide me any sample of the AST for a particular code.<br />
c) how loops are represented in AST??<br />
d)can i get some examples of the running javascripts that i can run using  dehydra over my c++ code or give me  any link regarding javascripts samples( of dehydra) for testing purpose of  AST of my c++ codes.</p>
<p>please reply soon.<br />
ANKUR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tglek</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2008/04/29/counting-down-to-a-dehydra-release/comment-page-1/#comment-16453</link>
		<dc:creator>tglek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2008/04/29/counting-down-to-a-dehydra-release/#comment-16453</guid>
		<description>Tom,
The answer to all these questions is, yes it would be nice. 
I&#039;m still waiting on the copyright assignment paperwork. I hope that at the summit we can work out how to get plugin functionality into GCC. I know people are skeptical about it, but I think we have a pretty good usecase, something that lacked before.

Pork is nothing but a collection on Elsa hacks to make it grok refactoring code. &quot;Pork on GCC&quot; basically means having equivalent features in GCC. I think that&#039;s a tromey-scale project. I dread the through of modifying parser code and adding/extending fe-specific AST nodes in GCC. It&#039;s certainly possible and if someone wants to do it, I&#039;ll gladly chat with them. 
However, for us it&#039;s easier to just maintain our Elsa version, than introduce such drastic changes to GCC.

I think before such a step is taken, I&#039;d rather see IDEs start using the gcc plugin framework to aid with code-completion/browsing. It&#039;s a reasonable first step towards using gcc for other source-related tasks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br />
The answer to all these questions is, yes it would be nice.<br />
I&#8217;m still waiting on the copyright assignment paperwork. I hope that at the summit we can work out how to get plugin functionality into GCC. I know people are skeptical about it, but I think we have a pretty good usecase, something that lacked before.</p>
<p>Pork is nothing but a collection on Elsa hacks to make it grok refactoring code. &#8220;Pork on GCC&#8221; basically means having equivalent features in GCC. I think that&#8217;s a tromey-scale project. I dread the through of modifying parser code and adding/extending fe-specific AST nodes in GCC. It&#8217;s certainly possible and if someone wants to do it, I&#8217;ll gladly chat with them.<br />
However, for us it&#8217;s easier to just maintain our Elsa version, than introduce such drastic changes to GCC.</p>
<p>I think before such a step is taken, I&#8217;d rather see IDEs start using the gcc plugin framework to aid with code-completion/browsing. It&#8217;s a reasonable first step towards using gcc for other source-related tasks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Tromey</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2008/04/29/counting-down-to-a-dehydra-release/comment-page-1/#comment-16452</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Tromey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2008/04/29/counting-down-to-a-dehydra-release/#comment-16452</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see more cooperation between GCC and the various plugin projects.  I know this isn&#039;t easy... something to discuss a bit at the summit.

I was wondering, though -- any plans to get your changes into GCC?  Maybe the GTY thing?  If the assignment stuff is worked out you could get your own branch at the very least.

Also, I&#039;m curious to know what it would take to base Pork on GCC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see more cooperation between GCC and the various plugin projects.  I know this isn&#8217;t easy&#8230; something to discuss a bit at the summit.</p>
<p>I was wondering, though &#8212; any plans to get your changes into GCC?  Maybe the GTY thing?  If the assignment stuff is worked out you could get your own branch at the very least.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m curious to know what it would take to base Pork on GCC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
