Comments on: Living Dead Code http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2008/09/26/living-dead-code/ Just another Blog.mozilla.com weblog Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:38:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Anders http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2008/09/26/living-dead-code/comment-page-1/#comment-20071 Anders Thu, 09 Oct 2008 08:32:25 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/?p=89#comment-20071 Are you going to collaborate with Caolan McNamara from Redhat doing similar work on OpenOffice? http://www.skynet.ie/~caolan/Packages/callcatcher.html http://blogs.linux.ie/caolan/2008/04/14/goooocon08/ OpenOffice would probably be a great place for automatic rewriting of C++. Best, Anders Are you going to collaborate with Caolan McNamara from Redhat doing similar work on OpenOffice?

http://www.skynet.ie/~caolan/Packages/callcatcher.html

http://blogs.linux.ie/caolan/2008/04/14/goooocon08/

OpenOffice would probably be a great place for automatic rewriting of C++.

Best,
Anders

]]> By: bubak http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2008/09/26/living-dead-code/comment-page-1/#comment-20022 bubak Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:07:17 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/?p=89#comment-20022 Thats why I like Java... :-) Thats why I like Java… :-)

]]> By: markus http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2008/09/26/living-dead-code/comment-page-1/#comment-19979 markus Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:58:04 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/?p=89#comment-19979 Do you guys realize that we need a language that attempts to strive to have VERY FEW AMOUNT OF LINES OF CODES? Growing lines-of-code count is really the number 1 ocmplexity problem in every programming language i know ... in some it is worse than in others Do you guys realize that we need a language that attempts to strive to have VERY FEW AMOUNT OF LINES OF CODES?

Growing lines-of-code count is really the number 1 ocmplexity problem in every programming language i know … in some it is worse than in others

]]> By: s http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2008/09/26/living-dead-code/comment-page-1/#comment-19978 s Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:28:01 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/?p=89#comment-19978 You are downright dangerous I'm glad you are not fucking around with any codebase I have to deal with You are downright dangerous I’m glad you are not fucking around with any codebase I have to deal with

]]> By: Joshua Cranmer http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2008/09/26/living-dead-code/comment-page-1/#comment-19963 Joshua Cranmer Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:27:16 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/?p=89#comment-19963 You forgot a wonderful extension: * Make it work for JS (also able to spot unused scriptable methods!) Also, I'm having a nice spot of removing code... before de-forking and adding documentation, my current WIP patch is doing a -2326/+632. Previous record: -2732/+1871 (after documentation). In any case, I guess it's time for me to run that stuff on mailnews to see what myriads of unused code I haven't yet discovered. You forgot a wonderful extension:
* Make it work for JS (also able to spot unused scriptable methods!)

Also, I’m having a nice spot of removing code… before de-forking and adding documentation, my current WIP patch is doing a -2326/+632. Previous record: -2732/+1871 (after documentation).

In any case, I guess it’s time for me to run that stuff on mailnews to see what myriads of unused code I haven’t yet discovered.

]]> By: Daniel http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2008/09/26/living-dead-code/comment-page-1/#comment-19962 Daniel Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:32:31 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/?p=89#comment-19962 I've started to search for dead code as well, but I'm not very efficient yet, though. Bug 455043 for example, it only needs a checkin for some dead code that is executed every page view. Or is this kind of code called something else? It seems that your focus is smaller than mine, but dead, unused and redundant code is everywhere. Anyway, I'd like to mention Bugs 413141, 433065 and 457208 as well. For what it's worth.. I’ve started to search for dead code as well, but I’m not very efficient yet, though.

Bug 455043 for example, it only needs a checkin for some dead code that is executed every page view. Or is this kind of code called something else?

It seems that your focus is smaller than mine, but dead, unused and redundant code is everywhere.

Anyway, I’d like to mention Bugs 413141, 433065 and 457208 as well. For what it’s worth..

]]>