<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Extension Memory Leak Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/tomcat/2008/03/21/extension-memory-leak-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/tomcat/2008/03/21/extension-memory-leak-testing/</link>
	<description>Blogging about Community, Mozilla Products and Projectsand other stuff !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:50:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: polonus</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/tomcat/2008/03/21/extension-memory-leak-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>polonus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/tomcat/2008/03/21/extension-memory-leak-testing/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>What is your opinion on spending time on extension bugs found through the error console in Minefield?
 I filed one as https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449081 

There they comment as it cannot be reproduced with another profile, the time spent on it is a waste of time and useless, I think for depending trunk bugs it could be helpful for the resolvers to come up with a better patch, the internal structure of the browser stays more or less the same. Like to hear your view on this?

polonus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is your opinion on spending time on extension bugs found through the error console in Minefield?<br />
 I filed one as <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449081" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449081</a> </p>
<p>There they comment as it cannot be reproduced with another profile, the time spent on it is a waste of time and useless, I think for depending trunk bugs it could be helpful for the resolvers to come up with a better patch, the internal structure of the browser stays more or less the same. Like to hear your view on this?</p>
<p>polonus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jigar Shah</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/tomcat/2008/03/21/extension-memory-leak-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Jigar Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/tomcat/2008/03/21/extension-memory-leak-testing/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I think this is must because lots of people use firefox because of its extensions (like me:)). And they blame firefox is slow and memory hog. Please publish your report because sometimes extension author is busy so he cannot fix them. But user can decide what to install and what not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is must because lots of people use firefox because of its extensions (like me:)). And they blame firefox is slow and memory hog. Please publish your report because sometimes extension author is busy so he cannot fix them. But user can decide what to install and what not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

