<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMO Preview Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/01/18/amo-preview-updates-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/01/18/amo-preview-updates-2/</link>
	<description>Everybody Likes Ninjas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:05:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Moe</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/01/18/amo-preview-updates-2/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/01/18/amo-preview-updates-2/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Ah, just wrote this as a comment to an older entry but this was supposed to be a comment on the current design. So here it goes again:

I don’t really like the new design, because
• too much design, too few information. A lot of blank and wasted space
• No separation between products. What if I’m only interested in Thunderbird?
• Probably still no way to list a lot of extensions with short descriptions to get an overview. Too much clicking, too much wasted time.
• Filesize would be nice, at least on the details page
• No releasedate information

Generally spoken: this goes solely in the direction “fancy” but it should mainly go in the direction “userfriendly” and “informative” (nothing against fancy, of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, just wrote this as a comment to an older entry but this was supposed to be a comment on the current design. So here it goes again:</p>
<p>I don’t really like the new design, because<br />
• too much design, too few information. A lot of blank and wasted space<br />
• No separation between products. What if I’m only interested in Thunderbird?<br />
• Probably still no way to list a lot of extensions with short descriptions to get an overview. Too much clicking, too much wasted time.<br />
• Filesize would be nice, at least on the details page<br />
• No releasedate information</p>
<p>Generally spoken: this goes solely in the direction “fancy” but it should mainly go in the direction “userfriendly” and “informative” (nothing against fancy, of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dao</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/01/18/amo-preview-updates-2/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Dao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/01/18/amo-preview-updates-2/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>What about non-Firefox extensions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about non-Firefox extensions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
