<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMO v3 (Remora) Delay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/</link>
	<description>Everybody Likes Ninjas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:05:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Tracy</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/#comment-1992</guid>
		<description>So what if the are running late?  Have you NEVER been late in your life?  The folks at Mozilla aren&#039;t Micro$oft con-artists. If they are running late, I&#039;d bet my cat they have a good reason. And I&#039;d bet my cat again that when this is released, it will work as advertised.

And they won&#039;t change the default colors in MSPaint to the most retarded, useless colors ever.  (I hate you Vista!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what if the are running late?  Have you NEVER been late in your life?  The folks at Mozilla aren&#8217;t Micro$oft con-artists. If they are running late, I&#8217;d bet my cat they have a good reason. And I&#8217;d bet my cat again that when this is released, it will work as advertised.</p>
<p>And they won&#8217;t change the default colors in MSPaint to the most retarded, useless colors ever.  (I hate you Vista!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrLacoste</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>MrLacoste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 09:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/#comment-943</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hey, give these guys a break, hold off with the Microsoft comparisons - and let them get it right.

They’ve done pretty well so far. &quot;

I agree with u.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hey, give these guys a break, hold off with the Microsoft comparisons &#8211; and let them get it right.</p>
<p>They’ve done pretty well so far. &#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with u.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: txGreg</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>txGreg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/#comment-649</guid>
		<description>Hmmm - the front page of the updates site should be updated (no pun intended) to at least point to this entry, or a newer one (if available).  The blurb on there still talks about a 24-hour delay... from over a week ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm &#8211; the front page of the updates site should be updated (no pun intended) to at least point to this entry, or a newer one (if available).  The blurb on there still talks about a 24-hour delay&#8230; from over a week ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keiron</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Keiron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/#comment-648</guid>
		<description>Hey, give these guys a break, hold off with the Microsoft comparisons - and let them get it right.

They&#039;ve done pretty well so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, give these guys a break, hold off with the Microsoft comparisons &#8211; and let them get it right.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve done pretty well so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ngamer01</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Ngamer01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/#comment-542</guid>
		<description>I have a question:  With the eventual launch of AMO v3, will users be allowed to make comments without having to give ratings to extensions/themes?

With the current version of AMO, the rating system was horribly used and abused time and time again by people giving a rating for comments that had nothing to do with the extension/theme the rating was given to.

Users should be allowed to make comments without having to add to the overall rating of an extension/theme.

Also the AMO team should highly stress that improper rating usage won&#039;t be tolerated and you would be at risk of being banned off mozilla.com and mozilla.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question:  With the eventual launch of AMO v3, will users be allowed to make comments without having to give ratings to extensions/themes?</p>
<p>With the current version of AMO, the rating system was horribly used and abused time and time again by people giving a rating for comments that had nothing to do with the extension/theme the rating was given to.</p>
<p>Users should be allowed to make comments without having to add to the overall rating of an extension/theme.</p>
<p>Also the AMO team should highly stress that improper rating usage won&#8217;t be tolerated and you would be at risk of being banned off mozilla.com and mozilla.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnNene</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>UnNene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Come on, at least we have to appreciate the transparency that lacks in other parts of the software industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, at least we have to appreciate the transparency that lacks in other parts of the software industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/#comment-515</guid>
		<description>I always thought Bill Gates was a &quot;Meatball&quot;.
Your comment proves it.

The AMO Team doesn&#039;t want to put out a product that doesn&#039;t work.
M$ is more than happy to put out a faulty product, issue a patch fir it that f#cks up your system, then issue a patch for the patch that only makes things even worse.

No wonder Mozilla is so popular......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought Bill Gates was a &#8220;Meatball&#8221;.<br />
Your comment proves it.</p>
<p>The AMO Team doesn&#8217;t want to put out a product that doesn&#8217;t work.<br />
M$ is more than happy to put out a faulty product, issue a patch fir it that f#cks up your system, then issue a patch for the patch that only makes things even worse.</p>
<p>No wonder Mozilla is so popular&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meatball</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Meatball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/#comment-478</guid>
		<description>Team? It would be interesting to know what percentage of the AMO team are REALLY a part of the team, and what percentage are only part of the team because AMO is a means to achieving their own agendas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Team? It would be interesting to know what percentage of the AMO team are REALLY a part of the team, and what percentage are only part of the team because AMO is a means to achieving their own agendas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baked</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Baked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>Caching is only going to mask the serious problems behind yesterday&#039;s database melting session. A lot of the pages are hitting well over 50 queries, many for data completely unrelated to the task at hand. For instance, a user&#039;s info page with 6 addons results in 65 queries (or 70+ when logged in). Cake is great for making working with databases wonderfully easy, but you need to savagely unbind things you don&#039;t need and even write your own model functions and custom queries for specific tasks, otherwise performance goes out the window.

I agree with Wladimir, don&#039;t let arbitrary dates that have been pulled out of thin air dictate when you release. Learn from the mistakes of the software you&#039;re replacing - you should release only when your team reaches a consensus that it&#039;s as ready as it needs to be for use in production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caching is only going to mask the serious problems behind yesterday&#8217;s database melting session. A lot of the pages are hitting well over 50 queries, many for data completely unrelated to the task at hand. For instance, a user&#8217;s info page with 6 addons results in 65 queries (or 70+ when logged in). Cake is great for making working with databases wonderfully easy, but you need to savagely unbind things you don&#8217;t need and even write your own model functions and custom queries for specific tasks, otherwise performance goes out the window.</p>
<p>I agree with Wladimir, don&#8217;t let arbitrary dates that have been pulled out of thin air dictate when you release. Learn from the mistakes of the software you&#8217;re replacing &#8211; you should release only when your team reaches a consensus that it&#8217;s as ready as it needs to be for use in production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fwenzel</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>fwenzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/02/14/amo-v3-remora-delay/#comment-448</guid>
		<description>Homzik: Thanks for your comment. Advanced search is on our list, and will come back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Homzik: Thanks for your comment. Advanced search is on our list, and will come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
