Comments on: Review Queue Completed http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/ Everybody Likes Ninjas Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:03:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Anish Sane http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/comment-page-1/#comment-56574 Anish Sane Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:05:07 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/#comment-56574 Even i am getting the same error as Pontus "Could not move file" i am neither able to upload new version of my previous addon nor am i able to upload a new add on... can any one help??? Even i am getting the same error as Pontus
“Could not move file”

i am neither able to upload new version of my previous addon
nor am i able to upload a new add on…
can any one help???

]]> By: Hamed Saber http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/comment-page-1/#comment-2205 Hamed Saber Sun, 25 Mar 2007 09:35:02 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/#comment-2205 I developed an extension for bypassing flickr.com censorship in Iran and UAE, named "Access Flickr!", which is now flagged as (Extension; In Sandbox; Public Nomination), and neither is accessible through search nor old URL. I receive lots of emails about asking it, can someone please let me know who others can seek for it?! Even a working URL can help me! I developed an extension for bypassing flickr.com censorship in Iran and UAE, named “Access Flickr!”, which is now flagged as (Extension; In Sandbox; Public Nomination), and neither is accessible through search nor old URL.
I receive lots of emails about asking it, can someone please let me know who others can seek for it?! Even a working URL can help me!

]]> By: Ola http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/comment-page-1/#comment-1722 Ola Sun, 18 Mar 2007 03:50:48 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/#comment-1722 Please leave the <a href='https://addons.mozilla.org/seamonkey/extensions/' rel="nofollow">seamonkey</a> alone. The old site is soo much better. I actually stopped following new add-ons when the interface changed. I loved the possibility to see the ratings up-front and to sort by download and rating. If you want to change, please improve and keep what is good. Please leave the seamonkey alone. The old site is soo much better. I actually stopped following new add-ons when the interface changed. I loved the possibility to see the ratings up-front and to sort by download and rating.
If you want to change, please improve and keep what is good.

]]> By: rene http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/comment-page-1/#comment-1530 rene Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:45:48 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/#comment-1530 If I look at http://preview.addons.mozilla.org/de/thunderbird/browse/type:1/status:1 I get a list of firefox extensions. The title says Thunderbird Add-ons, but one line further I can read 'Extensions are small add-ons that add new functionality to Firefox, ...' and thats only what I get, Firefox extensions. Regards, Rene If I look at
http://preview.addons.mozilla.org/de/thunderbird/browse/type:1/status:1
I get a list of firefox extensions. The title says Thunderbird Add-ons, but one line further I can read ‘Extensions are small add-ons that add new functionality to Firefox, …’ and thats only what I get, Firefox extensions.

Regards,
Rene

]]> By: Thomas http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/comment-page-1/#comment-1484 Thomas Tue, 13 Mar 2007 01:12:35 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/#comment-1484 I don't get the sandbox either. I submitted a theme update and didn't know what do with it so then I submitted it for review. Was that correct? Or was I to leave it alone after uploading it? I think the new admin side needs some direction. I don’t get the sandbox either. I submitted a theme update and didn’t know what do with it so then I submitted it for review. Was that correct? Or was I to leave it alone after uploading it? I think the new admin side needs some direction.

]]> By: Subrata http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/comment-page-1/#comment-1473 Subrata Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:26:36 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/#comment-1473 Based on experience as new registrant to addson.mozilla.org, I have following suggestion on sandbox link, which is currently only visible when user logs-in and enabled sandbox in their profile : - present the "sandbox" option as part of the profile during the registration of new user - make the "sandbox" link visible but protected on the public pages; otherwise new users have no idea there are more extension available behind the public site. Based on experience as new registrant to addson.mozilla.org, I have following suggestion on sandbox link, which is currently only visible when user logs-in and enabled sandbox in their profile :
– present the “sandbox” option as part of the profile during the registration of new user
– make the “sandbox” link visible but protected on the public pages; otherwise new users have no idea there are more extension available behind the public site.

]]> By: Michael Walden http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/comment-page-1/#comment-1455 Michael Walden Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:46:03 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/#comment-1455 As developer of the FOXSCAPE[1] theme, I will be disappointed if the "Add-on Details" section is not implemented on the new add-ons site. See example below: Add-on Details * Categories: * Retro * Last Updated: Dec 14, 2006 * Total Downloads: 38887 - Downloads this Week: 1033 I refer to that information when looking at skins and appreciate being able to see the download traffic they generate. Lastly, FOXSCAPE is not presently in the preview database. Do I need to update the skin to make it appear? If I need to update it, and do, will the existing user reviews be transferred to the preview site from the old site? What will happen if I do not update my skin before March 15th? I do not want to loose the existing reviews from the old site when the preview site goes live on the 15th. Please advise. TIA [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/4083/ As developer of the FOXSCAPE[1] theme, I will be disappointed if the
“Add-on Details” section is not implemented on the new add-ons site. See
example below:

Add-on Details
* Categories:
* Retro
* Last Updated: Dec 14, 2006
* Total Downloads: 38887 – Downloads this Week: 1033

I refer to that information when looking at skins and appreciate being
able to see the download traffic they generate.

Lastly, FOXSCAPE is not presently in the preview database. Do I need to
update the skin to make it appear? If I need to update it, and do, will
the existing user reviews be transferred to the preview site from the
old site? What will happen if I do not update my skin before March 15th?
I do not want to loose the existing reviews from the old site when the
preview site goes live on the 15th. Please advise. TIA

[1] https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/4083/

]]> By: Bill http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/comment-page-1/#comment-1454 Bill Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:43:49 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/#comment-1454 I think AMO should detect which version browser the user is using and filter out incompatible extensions. There are quite a few popular themes/extensions which were never yet ported to Firefox 2! I think AMO should detect which version browser the user is using and filter out incompatible extensions. There are quite a few popular themes/extensions which were never yet ported to Firefox 2!

]]> By: Scott Orgera http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/comment-page-1/#comment-1451 Scott Orgera Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:25:07 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/#comment-1451 Hello. I am the web browsers Guide for About.Com and have published several articles on Firefox Add-ons, including links to add-ons that I have recommended and reviewed. I realize that I will have to modify these links once the new site is launched. However, I have noticed that in the preview 90% of the add-ons that I link to are non-existent. These include some very good add-ons which my readers have commented on and have given nothing but good feedback about. Should we expect more add-ons to be added to the new site once it is launched? Thanks. Scott Orgera About Web Browsers Hello. I am the web browsers Guide for About.Com and have published several articles on Firefox Add-ons, including links to add-ons that I have recommended and reviewed. I realize that I will have to modify these links once the new site is launched. However, I have noticed that in the preview 90% of the add-ons that I link to are non-existent. These include some very good add-ons which my readers have commented on and have given nothing but good feedback about.

Should we expect more add-ons to be added to the new site once it is launched? Thanks.

Scott Orgera
About Web Browsers

]]> By: Anonymous http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/comment-page-1/#comment-1449 Anonymous Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:03:13 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/05/review-queue-completed/#comment-1449 Can somone please reply to Milos message? Is the queue halted again? Can somone please reply to Milos message? Is the queue halted again?

]]>