<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reviewing, the Sandbox, and &#8220;missing&#8221; add-ons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/</link>
	<description>Mozilla Web Development Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-61680</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-61680</guid>
		<description>I am in the same boat as Xad. The only check box on the "My Account" page is "Hide email address." I've been searching all day, and I've come up with nothing. Looking through other forums, I see that Xad and I are not alone. SOMEBODY PLEASE HELP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in the same boat as Xad. The only check box on the &#8220;My Account&#8221; page is &#8220;Hide email address.&#8221; I&#8217;ve been searching all day, and I&#8217;ve come up with nothing. Looking through other forums, I see that Xad and I are not alone. SOMEBODY PLEASE HELP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veg</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-61663</link>
		<dc:creator>Veg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-61663</guid>
		<description>I agree with Xad, I've been running circles trying to find the "sandbox" option. Can someone help me please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Xad, I&#8217;ve been running circles trying to find the &#8220;sandbox&#8221; option. Can someone help me please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xad</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-60692</link>
		<dc:creator>Xad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-60692</guid>
		<description>When i log in and go to the account setting, the Sandbox setting isn't there. It just has things about username, password, email but no Sandbox related stuff. Have they changed things around? I've been going round in circles looking for ways to get the option to appear on my accounts section, but no luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When i log in and go to the account setting, the Sandbox setting isn&#8217;t there. It just has things about username, password, email but no Sandbox related stuff. Have they changed things around? I&#8217;ve been going round in circles looking for ways to get the option to appear on my accounts section, but no luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-33054</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-33054</guid>
		<description>The folks over at Mozilla neglected to tell Firefox users how to enable the sandbox to see extensions that are in the sandbox. This is how you do it:

1. Go to https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
and click on "Register" to sign up for a Mozilla account and confirm it from your email account.

2. Click on "Login" to login and then click on "My Account" which will take you to the web page:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/users/edit

3. The fifth option in the Firefox Profiles page is "Show sandbox?". Check this box to enable the sandbox and then click on "Save"

4. Now you can browse, search and install extensions that are in the Mozilla Extensions Sandbox. Go here to see a list of extensions in the sandbox:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addons/home/status:1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The folks over at Mozilla neglected to tell Firefox users how to enable the sandbox to see extensions that are in the sandbox. This is how you do it:</p>
<p>1. Go to <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/</a><br />
and click on &#8220;Register&#8221; to sign up for a Mozilla account and confirm it from your email account.</p>
<p>2. Click on &#8220;Login&#8221; to login and then click on &#8220;My Account&#8221; which will take you to the web page:<br />
<a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/users/edit" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/users/edit</a></p>
<p>3. The fifth option in the Firefox Profiles page is &#8220;Show sandbox?&#8221;. Check this box to enable the sandbox and then click on &#8220;Save&#8221;</p>
<p>4. Now you can browse, search and install extensions that are in the Mozilla Extensions Sandbox. Go here to see a list of extensions in the sandbox:</p>
<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addons/home/status:1" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addons/home/status:1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yasha Karant</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-10381</link>
		<dc:creator>Yasha Karant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-10381</guid>
		<description>I was trying to download the Firefox 2 add-on getmail that more or less restores the Firefox 1 mail widget button to Firefox 2.  This add-on is now in the "sandbox" and when I attemtp to get it, I get the message:
The add-on you're looking for is in the sandbox, which you do not have enabled in your user preferences.
but I can find how to enable the sandbox?  I looked at the GUI Firefox interface Edit then Preferences, but no sign of any widget that enables searching the sandbox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was trying to download the Firefox 2 add-on getmail that more or less restores the Firefox 1 mail widget button to Firefox 2.  This add-on is now in the &#8220;sandbox&#8221; and when I attemtp to get it, I get the message:<br />
The add-on you&#8217;re looking for is in the sandbox, which you do not have enabled in your user preferences.<br />
but I can find how to enable the sandbox?  I looked at the GUI Firefox interface Edit then Preferences, but no sign of any widget that enables searching the sandbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David McRitchie</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-2255</link>
		<dc:creator>David McRitchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-2255</guid>
		<description>I expect the problems will turn out to be not that bad.   I don't like the idea of having to login and
hope that will not affect Google searches for extensions and  logging in will not be helpful to people who just want to install something.

I really like the fact that someone can come up with a simple original idea that really works and get it up and available and clearly visible before the copycats hit.  Hope that will still be the case.

Even when an extension becomes obsolete and it's features are builtin there is still things to be seen in the documentation which is sometimes better, and often was a lot more robust and had more planning than the builtin version by a different developer.  I would not like to see such documentation and old extensions actually disappear.

There has always been different levels of acceptance, and places to find extensions:
 http://addons.mozilla.org                the place to be,
 http://extensionroom.mozdev.org/    next best,
 
 and author sites &#38; blogs with extensions, 
 and user informaton webpages (such as mine) &#38; blogs.

I hope that the ratings within the sandbox do not become popularity contests.  You can look at ratings on accepted addons and see that a zero rating by someone who can't read can really affect ratings, and many negatives are misinterpretations or corrected but the ratings are still affected permanently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect the problems will turn out to be not that bad.   I don&#8217;t like the idea of having to login and<br />
hope that will not affect Google searches for extensions and  logging in will not be helpful to people who just want to install something.</p>
<p>I really like the fact that someone can come up with a simple original idea that really works and get it up and available and clearly visible before the copycats hit.  Hope that will still be the case.</p>
<p>Even when an extension becomes obsolete and it&#8217;s features are builtin there is still things to be seen in the documentation which is sometimes better, and often was a lot more robust and had more planning than the builtin version by a different developer.  I would not like to see such documentation and old extensions actually disappear.</p>
<p>There has always been different levels of acceptance, and places to find extensions:<br />
 <a href="http://addons.mozilla.org" rel="nofollow">http://addons.mozilla.org</a>                the place to be,<br />
 <a href="http://extensionroom.mozdev.org/" rel="nofollow">http://extensionroom.mozdev.org/</a>    next best,</p>
<p> and author sites &amp; blogs with extensions,<br />
 and user informaton webpages (such as mine) &amp; blogs.</p>
<p>I hope that the ratings within the sandbox do not become popularity contests.  You can look at ratings on accepted addons and see that a zero rating by someone who can&#8217;t read can really affect ratings, and many negatives are misinterpretations or corrected but the ratings are still affected permanently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theykilledfirefox</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-2248</link>
		<dc:creator>theykilledfirefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-2248</guid>
		<description>Will they get the hint from all he negative comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will they get the hint from all he negative comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-2239</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-2239</guid>
		<description>You have also broken a lot of Firefox fan sites as well.  I don't even know how many extensions I have posted about in the past are now resolving to a 404 thanks to the new Web site.  Having to re-hunt down extensions hosted alternate places isn't exactly what I wanted to do start my week doing.  Bad move all around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have also broken a lot of Firefox fan sites as well.  I don&#8217;t even know how many extensions I have posted about in the past are now resolving to a 404 thanks to the new Web site.  Having to re-hunt down extensions hosted alternate places isn&#8217;t exactly what I wanted to do start my week doing.  Bad move all around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-2232</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 06:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-2232</guid>
		<description>As many others here, I'd like to express some frustration with the new version of addons.mozilla.org. 

I understand that it was needed to change the reviewing system to deal with the increasing number of extensions. And I appreciate the hard work put into the whole Mozila project in general and into addons.mozilla.org in particular.

If extension developers are unhappy with the new site, they will just put their extension somewhere else. Please don't forget that they, too, are unpaid volunteers and deserve some consideration.

I really don't like the new system as it is currently implemented. It seems that only registered users can access the Sandbox and they need special actions to enable and then go the Sandbox. I cannot see how my extension will ever get any review with this system, unless I send email to the many happy users I received mails from and ask them to subscribe, enable the Sandbox, find Nostalgy, submit a review. At least with the old system, people felt responsible for accepting/rejecting extensions. Now, nobody is in charge, and the site really gives no incentive to become a reviewer.

My suggestion would be to allow anyone to see extensions in the Sandbox by default, with no specific action at all. The search engine should return results from the Sandbox, and only display them with a scary theme and tell the users to be careful, to try the extension at their own risk, and *to submit a review if they like/dislike the extension*. Maybe a sandboxed extension could even require the user to be logged in, in order to be downloaded, but please show the description page to everyone!


Other things I don't like:

- broken links to old extension pages: it doesn't seem so hard to put a page explaining the new Sandbox system instead, does it?

- comments seems to have been deleted; I really hope they'll be back. How do you expect new users to try an extension if they cannot even see comments?


What I really like is the idea of browsing the source code directly from the site. (However, at least for my extension, the javascript sources are not shown.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many others here, I&#8217;d like to express some frustration with the new version of addons.mozilla.org. </p>
<p>I understand that it was needed to change the reviewing system to deal with the increasing number of extensions. And I appreciate the hard work put into the whole Mozila project in general and into addons.mozilla.org in particular.</p>
<p>If extension developers are unhappy with the new site, they will just put their extension somewhere else. Please don&#8217;t forget that they, too, are unpaid volunteers and deserve some consideration.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t like the new system as it is currently implemented. It seems that only registered users can access the Sandbox and they need special actions to enable and then go the Sandbox. I cannot see how my extension will ever get any review with this system, unless I send email to the many happy users I received mails from and ask them to subscribe, enable the Sandbox, find Nostalgy, submit a review. At least with the old system, people felt responsible for accepting/rejecting extensions. Now, nobody is in charge, and the site really gives no incentive to become a reviewer.</p>
<p>My suggestion would be to allow anyone to see extensions in the Sandbox by default, with no specific action at all. The search engine should return results from the Sandbox, and only display them with a scary theme and tell the users to be careful, to try the extension at their own risk, and *to submit a review if they like/dislike the extension*. Maybe a sandboxed extension could even require the user to be logged in, in order to be downloaded, but please show the description page to everyone!</p>
<p>Other things I don&#8217;t like:</p>
<p>- broken links to old extension pages: it doesn&#8217;t seem so hard to put a page explaining the new Sandbox system instead, does it?</p>
<p>- comments seems to have been deleted; I really hope they&#8217;ll be back. How do you expect new users to try an extension if they cannot even see comments?</p>
<p>What I really like is the idea of browsing the source code directly from the site. (However, at least for my extension, the javascript sources are not shown.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CP</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-2229</link>
		<dc:creator>CP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/23/reviewing-the-sandbox-and-missing-add-ons/#comment-2229</guid>
		<description>This is absurd.
It was a mess the old way, its a mess this way.
Its a process of improvements, it wont magically get perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is absurd.<br />
It was a mess the old way, its a mess this way.<br />
Its a process of improvements, it wont magically get perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
