<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: all pre-existing add-ons restored (made public)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/</link>
	<description>Everybody Likes Ninjas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:05:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: aşk sözleri</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/comment-page-1/#comment-208839</link>
		<dc:creator>aşk sözleri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/#comment-208839</guid>
		<description>Who should I contact if I would like to have one of my extensions moved into the sandbox?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who should I contact if I would like to have one of my extensions moved into the sandbox?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sohbet</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/comment-page-1/#comment-203650</link>
		<dc:creator>sohbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/#comment-203650</guid>
		<description>kind of working around the problem for now anyway by using the old search engine on the old addons site:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kind of working around the problem for now anyway by using the old search engine on the old addons site:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sohbet odaları</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/comment-page-1/#comment-203221</link>
		<dc:creator>sohbet odaları</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/#comment-203221</guid>
		<description>Who should I contact if I would like to have one of my extensions moved into the sandbox?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who should I contact if I would like to have one of my extensions moved into the sandbox?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akrep</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/comment-page-1/#comment-188927</link>
		<dc:creator>Akrep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/#comment-188927</guid>
		<description>Who should I contact if I would like to have one of my extensions moved into the sandbox?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who should I contact if I would like to have one of my extensions moved into the sandbox?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nakliyat</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/comment-page-1/#comment-184306</link>
		<dc:creator>nakliyat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/#comment-184306</guid>
		<description>Hopefully this will this will get corrected before the workaround and old site is no longer available</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully this will this will get corrected before the workaround and old site is no longer available</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sohbet</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/comment-page-1/#comment-173800</link>
		<dc:creator>Sohbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/#comment-173800</guid>
		<description>Hopefully this will this will get corrected before the workaround and old site is no longer available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully this will this will get corrected before the workaround and old site is no longer available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travesti</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/comment-page-1/#comment-103511</link>
		<dc:creator>travesti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/#comment-103511</guid>
		<description>and kind of working around the problem for now anyway by using the old search engine on the old addons site. Hopefully this will this will get corrected before the workaround and old site is no longer available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and kind of working around the problem for now anyway by using the old search engine on the old addons site. Hopefully this will this will get corrected before the workaround and old site is no longer available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David McRitchie</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/comment-page-1/#comment-5456</link>
		<dc:creator>David McRitchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/#comment-5456</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s almost a month later and the &quot;Advanced Search&quot; for addons has not be restored in any manner that I can find.  

I was hoping for a big improvement in this area, including a direct url link to the advanced search that could be bookmarked and used by &quot;Add to Search Bar&quot; extension, and an enhanced advanced search form,  and instead of being improved it appears to be gone.

I&#039;ve placed the following page on my site listing several problems.
  http://www.mvps.org/dmcritchie/firefox/addons_2007.htm
and kind of working around the problem for now anyway by using the old search engine on the old addons site.   Hopefully this will this will get corrected before the workaround and old site is no longer available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s almost a month later and the &#8220;Advanced Search&#8221; for addons has not be restored in any manner that I can find.  </p>
<p>I was hoping for a big improvement in this area, including a direct url link to the advanced search that could be bookmarked and used by &#8220;Add to Search Bar&#8221; extension, and an enhanced advanced search form,  and instead of being improved it appears to be gone.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve placed the following page on my site listing several problems.<br />
  <a href="http://www.mvps.org/dmcritchie/firefox/addons_2007.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.mvps.org/dmcritchie/firefox/addons_2007.htm</a><br />
and kind of working around the problem for now anyway by using the old search engine on the old addons site.   Hopefully this will this will get corrected before the workaround and old site is no longer available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Buckley</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/comment-page-1/#comment-2963</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 01:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/#comment-2963</guid>
		<description>That was the only thing I saw in the update, all the junky add-ons falling into the sand box.  But I hope that it will work out for the better in the end.  I would have really like the quality bar to rise.  Make getting in something you have to work for, for just something the happens over night.

Also as sneaky said, can the default order the add-ons in something other than alphabetical.  Rating or popularity would make sure the best are up the top of the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was the only thing I saw in the update, all the junky add-ons falling into the sand box.  But I hope that it will work out for the better in the end.  I would have really like the quality bar to rise.  Make getting in something you have to work for, for just something the happens over night.</p>
<p>Also as sneaky said, can the default order the add-ons in something other than alphabetical.  Rating or popularity would make sure the best are up the top of the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zed</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/comment-page-1/#comment-2859</link>
		<dc:creator>Zed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 21:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2007/03/26/all-pre-existing-add-ons-restored-made-public/#comment-2859</guid>
		<description>Dear AMO team,
Accepting and fixing mistakes is a rare quality nowadays. This shows a high sense of humanness and professionalism. Many and I really appreciate. 
Thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear AMO team,<br />
Accepting and fixing mistakes is a rare quality nowadays. This shows a high sense of humanness and professionalism. Many and I really appreciate.<br />
Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
