Comments on: CSS3 Awesome Test http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2009/02/27/css3-awesome-test/ Everybody Likes Ninjas Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:03:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: rdoherty http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2009/02/27/css3-awesome-test/comment-page-1/#comment-193401 rdoherty Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:41:20 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/?p=283#comment-193401 @skierpage: The issue you describe sounds like a OS-level problem? On OSX Firefox 3.6 nightly the demonstration looks good to me. @Dao: I couldn't find anything about border-colors on the W3C site, you are right. I've removed the link and noted it. @Matt Gaunt Browser vendors use a prefix when implementing a CSS spec that hasn't been finalized. @skierpage:
The issue you describe sounds like a OS-level problem? On OSX Firefox 3.6 nightly the demonstration looks good to me.

@Dao:
I couldn’t find anything about border-colors on the W3C site, you are right. I’ve removed the link and noted it.

@Matt Gaunt
Browser vendors use a prefix when implementing a CSS spec that hasn’t been finalized.

]]> By: Matt Gaunt http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2009/02/27/css3-awesome-test/comment-page-1/#comment-190864 Matt Gaunt Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:42:51 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/?p=283#comment-190864 Awesome looking css features, but why dont firefox use the appropriate css3 tags instead of their own prefix with the css tag?? Just curious, love the rounded corners sooo much!!! Awesome looking css features, but why dont firefox use the appropriate css3 tags instead of their own prefix with the css tag??

Just curious, love the rounded corners sooo much!!!

]]> By: skierpage http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2009/02/27/css3-awesome-test/comment-page-1/#comment-190170 skierpage Sat, 07 Mar 2009 22:32:14 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/?p=283#comment-190170 Now with latest Firefox 3.2a nightly Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090307 Minefield/3.2a1pre ID:20090307035349 the layout stays looking good zoomed in, but the font is much thinner and uglier and any zoom level than your screen shot. Also, the dot on the 'i' appears as a diamond at high zoom, while your screenshot is a square, and the original seems round. Now with latest Firefox 3.2a nightly Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090307 Minefield/3.2a1pre ID:20090307035349 the layout stays looking good zoomed in, but the font is much thinner and uglier and any zoom level than your screen shot.

Also, the dot on the ‘i’ appears as a diamond at high zoom, while your screenshot is a square, and the original seems round.

]]> By: Schmoo http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2009/02/27/css3-awesome-test/comment-page-1/#comment-189702 Schmoo Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:12:06 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/?p=283#comment-189702 That's nothing, you should try -moz-animated-reflection and -moz-dancing-jesus. That’s nothing, you should try -moz-animated-reflection and -moz-dancing-jesus.

]]> By: rsayre http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2009/02/27/css3-awesome-test/comment-page-1/#comment-189693 rsayre Wed, 04 Mar 2009 07:50:52 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/?p=283#comment-189693 that's hot that’s hot

]]> By: mesme http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2009/02/27/css3-awesome-test/comment-page-1/#comment-189386 mesme Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:46:45 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/?p=283#comment-189386 The 90s just called, they want their flaming logo back. The 90s just called, they want their flaming logo back.

]]> By: Dao http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2009/02/27/css3-awesome-test/comment-page-1/#comment-189093 Dao Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:38:03 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/?p=283#comment-189093 It's border-colors, not border-color, and thus the link to w3.org is wrong. It’s border-colors, not border-color, and thus the link to w3.org is wrong.

]]> By: Jeff Walden http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2009/02/27/css3-awesome-test/comment-page-1/#comment-189059 Jeff Walden Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:41:40 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/?p=283#comment-189059 MY EYES! MY EYES!

]]> By: skierpage http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2009/02/27/css3-awesome-test/comment-page-1/#comment-189031 skierpage Sat, 28 Feb 2009 02:18:48 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/?p=283#comment-189031 The font doesn't match the screenshot for me in Firefox 3.2 nightly (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090227 Minefield/3.2a1pre ID:20090227035151), it's thin and wimpy until I zoom in, then I start to see the Delicious design (still narrower) and the layout breaks. Still, very very cool! The font doesn’t match the screenshot for me in Firefox 3.2 nightly (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090227 Minefield/3.2a1pre ID:20090227035151), it’s thin and wimpy until I zoom in, then I start to see the Delicious design (still narrower) and the layout breaks.

Still, very very cool!

]]> By: Tomer http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2009/02/27/css3-awesome-test/comment-page-1/#comment-189020 Tomer Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:14:15 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/?p=283#comment-189020 Wonderful! Wonderful!

]]>